The American National Religion

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Some observations from Laurence Vance on some of what constitutes our present national insanity:

The Cult of the Uniform
By Laurence M. Vance
December 25, 2013

There are a number of distinctly American symbols that evoke feelings of pride, nationalism, and patriotism. There is the Constitution. There are monuments like Mount Rushmore, the Lincoln Memorial, the Washington Monument, and the Jefferson Memorial. There are structures like the Statue of Liberty and the Liberty Bell. There are buildings like the White House and the Capitol. There are also things that there are many of: American flags, bald eagles, dollar bills, and images of Uncle Sam and the Great Seal of the United States.

In the last ten or so years, these symbols have all been superceded by one image that is so powerful and so overwhelming that it drives some Americans to tears and causes others to act in the most nonsensical and irrational of ways.

I am referring to a military uniform.

Not just any military uniform, of course, but one of the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines. And especially a uniform adorned with lots of badges, awards, medals, ribbons, and insignias. Naturally, a uniform that indicates that a member of the military has been in combat is far superior to a uniform not so ornamented.

Things have only gotten worse since William Deresiewicz wrote in theNew York Times a few years ago:

NO symbol is more sacred in American life right now than the military uniform. The cross is divisive; the flag has been put to partisan struggle. But the uniform commands nearly automatic and universal reverence. In Congress as on television, generals are treated with awed respect, service members spoken of as if they were saints. Liberals are especially careful to make the right noises: obeisance to the uniform having become the shibboleth of patriotism, as anti-Communism used to be. Across the political spectrum, throughout the media, in private and public life, the pieties and ritual declarations are second nature now: “warriors,” “heroes,” “mission”; “our young men and women in uniform,” “our brave young men and women,” “our finest young people.” So common has this kind of language become, we scarcely notice it anymore.

The cult of the uniform originated about ten years after the end of the Vietnam War—a war in which over 58,000 Americans died to get their names on a wall. To overcome the “Vietnam Syndrome,” the United States needed some swift, decisive, and favorable military actions. President Reagan launched an invasion of the small island nation of Grenada in October of 1983. Naturally, U.S. forces overwhelmed the opposition.

Although universally condemned around the world, the military action was popular in the United States, especially since “only” 19 U.S. soldiers were killed for no good reason. Of course, it helped that just two days before the invasion of Grenada, 241 American servicemen were blown to bits by a suicide bomber who drove a truck into the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon.

The cult of the uniform was increased when President George H. W. Bush made two attempts to overcome the Vietnam Syndrome. First he invaded Panama in December of 1989 to oust dictator and former CIA asset Manuel Noriega. The “war” only lasted about a month. This time “only” 23 U.S. soldiers were killed to make the world safe for the U.S. military. Then Bush invaded Iraq (the first invasion) in January of 1991 after one autocratic Muslim state (Iraq) invaded another autocratic Muslim state (Kuwait). It was all over in about a month. The immensely popular Persian Gulf War resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqis, but “just” 293 American servicemen. But as Pat Buchanan said at the time: “Why should a single American die for the Emir of Kuwait?” President Bush stated at the war’s end: “By God, we’ve kicked the Vietnam syndrome once and for all!”

The cult of the uniform was expanded into what it is today by the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11. All military personnel are now heroes. Sporting events have turned into military worship services. Discounts galore are now offered to military personnel. Show up in a military uniform (but not a bus driver, plumber, or auto mechanic uniform) at many restaurants on Veterans Day and you can get a free meal. At many airlines, military personnel board the planes first along with the first class passengers. There are announcements in airports welcoming home military personnel and thanking them for all they do to keep us safe. Parents put bumper stickers on their cars that mention that their son (or daughter) is serving in the military. Businesses proclaim their support for the troops on their signs and in their advertisements. Military personnel who wear their uniforms out in public are stopped and thanked for their service. Patriotism is now equated with admiration for the military. And, of course, the big lie that the troops are defending our freedoms is repeated morning, noon, and night.

The cult of the uniform has spread to churches as well. Many churches encourage members of the military to wear their uniforms to church on the Sunday before the three national military appreciation days (Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Veterans Day). Woe be to the unsuspecting Christian if one of these days falls on a Sunday! Sometimes military guest speakers are invited for one of these services. Special military appreciation days are also held throughout the year. Prayers are offered for those serving in “harm’s way” (but never for their victims). Military chaplains are held in high esteem. Some churches put slogans on their signs or in their bulletins about U.S. troops dying for our freedoms like Christ died for our sins. Young men (and women) who announce that they are joining the military are applauded in church more than those who announce their surrender to some foreign mission field.

The cult of the uniform is retroactive; that is, all veterans are still accorded the glory, laud, and honor given to active duty military personnel. Just the sight of someone in a store wearing a hat that says “World War II Veteran” or “Vietnam Veteran” gives some Americans goose bumps. Every veteran is a hero, no matter where he fought or what he did or didn’t do there. Veterans get preferential treatment in employment. They are recognized in schools during Veterans Day programs. They are recognized in churches on the Sunday closest to Veterans Day.

The cult of the uniform is at its worst when it comes to U.S. servicemen fighting senseless, unjust, immoral, and unconstitutional wars. The presence or absence of a uniform is all that it takes to not hold or hold someone responsible for destruction of person and property. It is okay for someone to put on a military uniform and kill someone half way around the world who was no threat to America, but it is murder if the same person killed someone here in the United States. A terrorist is anyone who detonates a bomb—unless he is wearing a U.S. military uniform. Americans are outraged when an American kills his mother, but put yellow ribbons on their cars saying “support the troops” when the government tells an American to put on a uniform and go kill some foreigner’s mother. The putting on of a uniform allows morality to be put off.

The cult of the uniform is the national religion. It turns atheists into religionists, Jews into warvangelicals, and Christians into idolaters. It must be opposed, root and branch.

Laurence M. Vance [send him mail] writes from central Florida. He is the author of King James, His Bible, and Its Translators, The Revolution that Wasn't, The War on Drugs Is a War on Freedom, and Social Insecurity. His latest books are War, Christianity, and the State: Essays on the Follies of Christian Militarism and War, Empire, and the Military: Essays on the Follies of War and U.S. Foreign Policy. Visit his website.

Copyright © 2013 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit and a live link are given.
 
Last edited:

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
One subject no one mentions in the fervor of appreciation for vets is how they are expected to fight and kill, then return home to civilian life as if they didn't see what they saw, or do what they did. I appreciate the fact that so few of them lose it, when it seems the reality would be overwhelming.
There isn't much honesty in discussions about war, though, that's for sure.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
One subject no one mentions in the fervor of appreciation for vets is how they are expected to fight and kill, then return home to civilian life as if they didn't see what they saw, or do what they did.
It's often unaddressed or not considered by many ... at least publicly.

Anti-war.com tends to have some decent ongoing coverage of the issue.

Here at EO, I think LOS has addressed it in a general manner, based on the experiences of some close to him. I can understand that it might well be a very painful subject - not only for those personally dealing with what they had to experience in war, but also for those close to them - who may desperately want to help but feel largely powerless to do so ...

I appreciate the fact that so few of them lose it, when it seems the reality would be overwhelming.
I think that the reality of it is that a majority are profoundly affected by what they have experienced.

How could one not be ... and still retain any shred of humanity ?

It is apparently true however that at present more are recognized as having psychological problems as a consequence of their service on the battlefield.

What this is due to, I do not know. It could be better recognition and less denial on the part of the services and general public ... or it might be somehow due to the nature of war at present and the way it's been conducted recently.

Or just the awareness of the specific individuals involved, in terms being better informed of the actual truth re: politics, foreign policy, and the like.

In any event, it's an utterly tragic cost to the youth of our nation, which they often must bear needlessly ...

There isn't much honesty in discussions about war, though, that's for sure.
Yes ... there absolutely isn't ...
 
Last edited:

jaminjim

Veteran Expediter
So is this post about America's involvement in wars that we shouldn't have been in, or about showing admiration for those that are in the Military? I'm going out on a limb here I'm guessing that 'attacking' a guy in uniform is a backdoor attempt to tell people that we are in an illegal war.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
So is this post about America's involvement in wars that we shouldn't have been in, or about showing admiration for those that are in the Military?
jj,

I'm not sure which post "this post" above refers to ?

The original article ?

My comments on the original article ?

My comments in response to cheri ?

FWIW, I'd say the article is probably about both - and how a nation can misplace it priorities and become fanatical on militarism nearly to the point of insanity ...

I'm going out on a limb here I'm guessing that 'attacking' a guy in uniform is a backdoor attempt to tell people that we are in an illegal war.
If you are referring to Vance's comments in the original article I quoted/posted all I can tell ya, is that I know Vance as a Christian is very much anti-war (that's my simplistic characterization) ... if you want to know more than that, email him - his email link is above.

He may well answer you - he has answered me when I have emailed him previously.
 

Maverick

Seasoned Expediter
It would certainly seem a mild case of insanity.

It's not the uniform, or the low ranking person in that uniform, that gets to me. Most of these people would defend this country with all the vigor required for defense. Normally, a country is most proud when it's brave solders are protecting them, while defending the home turf.

It's the high ranking career political people at the top, which tend to make me ill. They use the aforementioned as pawns in a world game of chess. Wonder if the mental anguish of the low level solder, upon returning from wars over there, could at least partly be attributed to the question of......

WHY?
 

jaminjim

Veteran Expediter
I get a kick out of the high ranking officers, with ribbons nine rows high. Half of the ribbons on their chest can only be awarded to Field grade officers. So they are just look at me ribbons.
 

WanderngFool

Active Expediter
Hey just because I like straight forward rock and roll from a few centuries ago:


CCR said:
And when the taxman comes to the door.
Lord the house looking like a rummage sale.

Some things never change. They still avoid taxes but now Fox writes their ad copy for them. Same story. Slightly different context. More gullible viewership.
 

hookertrash

Rookie Expediter
Umm, yea I read enough when the fool who wrote this poor excuse of an article, called our enemies "victims", what a fool the young people who join the military and put on the uniform should be respected and honored. I'm sure your asking why it's simple they have the balls to stand on a road and search for possible bombs in a car or truck, they have the balls to have complete faith in a country to tell them what to do with their life even if it means death, they have the balls to risk everything they have and anything they may have in the future, so if by posting this idiotic article makes you feel better about yourself less power to ya, personally people who try to bring down others to make themselves look better makes me sick.
 

hookertrash

Rookie Expediter
Maybe you should try to look up the meanings behind the ribbons?, I've never heard of the look at me ribbons...I guess you know...right?
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Maybe you should try to look up the meanings behind the ribbons?, I've never heard of the look at me ribbons...I guess you know...right?
If you're talking to jaminjim, you have absolutely no idea whatsoever who you're talkin' to ...

Unlike you, I actually do ...
 
Last edited:

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Maybe you should try to look up the meanings behind the ribbons?, I've never heard of the look at me ribbons...I guess you know...right?

Um, it seems that a person who knows exactly what those ribbons can be awarded for [and to whom] has a pretty good idea of the meanings behind the ribbons.
The person who believes that everyone who puts on a military uniform deserves to be honored for it is the one I'd call a fool, because there's plenty of evidence that not everyone honors the uniform. And even more evidence that those who don't wear the uniform [and often never did] but command those who do are the least worthy of honor.
Like RLENT says, the costs borne by our young people are high, and I think that ought to require more justification than is presently the case. Not to mention the loss of potential they represent, which is a loss we can ill afford - we need all the brains we can get.
 

jaminjim

Veteran Expediter
Six out of the top nine Decorations (the ones at the very top over his left pocket) of The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey are only awarded to Generals (and Navy pukes of similar rank). Two more ribbons are more or less "Here I am" ribbons. He wears nineteen ribbons and two badges on the upper left of the uniform, eight of which are "Look at me ribbons".

Most soldiers that I know or have known look for CIB's/CAB's (CIB w/one star is respected even more, don't get me started about my old Platoon Sargent that had two stars) , Silver/Bronze Stars (bonus for "V"'s) and your campaign ribbons. This is obviously after we noticed the combat patch.

The only other device that gets attention from the people that I know hangs around the neck, or rests on a casket.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The person who believes that everyone who puts on a military uniform deserves to be honored for it is the one I'd call a fool, because there's plenty of evidence that not everyone honors the uniform.

Or the person who believes that everyone who puts on a military uniform doesn't deserve to be honored for it until proven otherwise just may be the fool. No, not everyone honors the uniform, but everyone deserves thanks and respect for wearing it until such point as they prove otherwise.
 

Dreamer

Administrator Emeritus
Charter Member
I've read these posts, and I guess I'm one of the fools. I never served, obviously, but I have MANY friends and family members who did. We've lost many to war, some 50 years later. I have a cousin on the wall. I have friends now who are serving, and actually at our age, are getting ready to retire.

They were not all good people. But.. they all deserved and got respect from me for their willingness to put on that uniform and risk their lives. Did all end up risking their lives? Nope.. some never saw a bit of action. They were still willing. Did they all honor that uniform? Nope. But they still wore it, and risked their lives. Did they all fight in wars that were justified? OH HECK NO... but they did it.


I supposed it's like the article Linda posted.. Are you a real trucker? Are we all here 'real truckers?", or do Real truckers only drive 18 wheelers in the the mountains with manual shift transmissions? I don't agree with LOTS of people on here, but they get a modicum of respect simply because they were willing to make the sacrifice to leave their families for days, weeks, or months at a time to try to make a buck.


Are all soldiers perfect battle honed and tested grizzled old vets? Nope.. but they went.

In my little circle of friend and family ....we have National guard, Army, Marines, Navy, Air force. All are not at the same risk.. but all were willing.

They ALL deserve and get my respect. For those here who served, THANK YOU... will we all ever agree? Probably not.. but it took guts to put on that uniform and step up, no matter the reason. A solder, like truckers, may always judge what constitutes a 'real soldier' and what he did to earn those ribbons. He has that right.. he's BEEN there.. but when I see that uniform, I know he was WILLING to do more than I have done.


I say, God Bless them, and YOU vets all.. I don't give a crap if you believe in Him or not, I hope He STILL blesses you.. why? Because "greater love has no man"...


Does that make me part of the cult? Maybe so... I don't care.. I love my friends and family who have/are serving currently. I may not agree with the administration that sent them, but I will HONOR their willingness to go.



Dale
 

Dreamer

Administrator Emeritus
Charter Member
Jamin Jim,

Truth. I'm not sure I know the difference, to be honest. I honor/appreciate all. You have more insight than me. I can tell you.. I had a favorite uncle, I mean that one who was my buddy, who would do anything for me, hard working tobacco farmer, electric company lineman, he was my buddy, teach me how to be a man, give you life lessons, old school stand up, salute the flag type of uncle.... James Sullivan of Grayson KY.. just an army grunt... good man, tho the world will never know who he was... I respect him, AND honor him.. at 86 years old, he flashed back to WW2 and thought he was still there, to the point he lost touch with current reality, locked his doors, locked out his family got his guns out and required deputies to come get him out due to PTSD 60 some years after the fact.
He was my friend. My uncle. I loved him. He lost touch with reality and returned to that kid in WW2.

Do I honor that, or respect that?
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
One subject no one mentions in the fervor of appreciation for vets is how they are expected to fight and kill, then return home to civilian life as if they didn't see what they saw, or do what they did. I appreciate the fact that so few of them lose it, when it seems the reality would be overwhelming.
Linked at antiwar.com today:

Army Releases November 2013 Suicide Information


The Army released suicide data today for the month of November 2013.

Among active-duty soldiers, there were 14 potential suicides: one has been confirmed as suicide, and 13 remain under investigation. For October 2013, the Army reported 10 potential suicides among active duty soldiers: two have been confirmed as suicides, and eight are under investigation. For calendar year 2013, there have been 139 potential active duty suicides: 74 have been confirmed as suicides, and 65 remain under investigation. Updated active duty suicide numbers for calendar year 2012: 185 (184 have been confirmed as suicides, and one remains under investigation).

During November 2013, among reserve component soldiers who were not on active duty, there were 10 potential suicides (six Army National Guard and four Army Reserve): one has been confirmed as suicide, and nine remain under investigation. For October 2013, among that same group, the Army reported 12 potential suicides; however, subsequent to the report, three more cases were added, bringing October's total to 15: five have been confirmed as suicides and 10 cases remain under investigation. For calendar year 2013, there have been 139 potential not on active duty suicides (89 Army National Guard and 50 Army Reserve): 94 have been confirmed as suicides, and 45 remain under investigation. Updated not on active duty suicide numbers for calendar year 2012: 140 (93 Army National Guard and 47 Army Reserve): 140 have been confirmed as suicides and none remain under investigation.

Soldiers and families in need of crisis assistance can contact the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. Trained consultants are available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, 365 days a year and can be contacted by dialing 1-800-273-TALK (8255) or by visiting their website at http://www.suicidepreventionlifeline.org/
Defense.gov News Release: Army Releases November 2013 Suicide Information
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Study: Deployments not reason for increase in military suicides - Stripes

Study: Mental illness, not combat, causes soldier suicides - CNN.com

The record number of military suicides seen in recent years may not be directly due to extended deployments or combat experience, according to a new study. This data analysis, funded by the Department of Defense, suggests that the real reason behind the growing number of military suicides is underlying mental health issues in this population. Their findings will be published in the next edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"The findings from this study are not consistent with the assumption that specific deployment-related characteristics, such as length of deployment, number of deployments or combat experiences are directly associated with increased suicide risk," the study authors wrote.

"Many people might be surprised by these results, but my colleagues and I really weren't surprised based on what we know about the people who have committed suicide," said Cynthia LeardMann. ... "Most suicides happen among troops who have not seen combat."
 

Maverick

Seasoned Expediter
This data analysis, funded by the Department of Defense, suggests that the real reason behind the growing number of military suicides is underlying mental health issues in this population. Their findings will be published in the next edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

All one needs to know..............
 
Top