Piper1, u'r right on;
OOIDA's paper dated Nov 4, 2008 titled "Quebec Minister Boulet Reneges on Speed Limiter Commitment" states “It’s unbelievable that in an economic climate where people are struggling to maintain their livelihoods, Quebec has decided to ignore their commitment to wait on this mandate. They appear to be deliberately impacting trade. We will not sit idly by and let them put truckers out of business,” Craig stated.
“The large trucking corporations who are pushing for a speed limiter mandate well know it will not increase safety or benefit the environment as they’ve advertised. They’re in it for limiting competition and harming the little guy.”
OOIDA is prepared to file a Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration for breach of Canada’s obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement upon implementation of the speed limiter mandate. Here's link to the article;
Quebec Minister Boulet Reneges on Speed Limiter Commitment
I also read results of a study by Transport Canada published back in July of 2008 expressing "Despite the perception that OEMs are generally supportive of mandatory limiter rules for heavy trucks, comments by the Truck Manufacturers Association and Engine Manufacturers Association show that equipment suppliers are pretty much against such a policy, as it stands, for Canada or the U.S." in regards to technical considerations of setting the ecms per customer's request and the liability there of as well as the "tamper proof" issue goes.
Article found here;
Today?s Trucking - Dealing with issues including trucking regulations, fleet management, owners/operators, and the latest in trucking products.
It will be interesting to see just how this plays out. Me thinks a wait and see approach on adding such a limiter is a good idea for now. GO GO OOIDA. BTW, not meant to be a plug for OOIDA, but i heard on XM Landline they have a new member sign-up special thru the end of the yr for $25.
Dougb
Panther Team St truck