That's not an assumption, it's fact, as he's never written anything positive about homosexuality. In addition, you have to have at least basic reading comprehension skills in order to understand his writings so as to be familiar with them, so there's no assumption in that regard, either.You used assumption yourself when you said "anyone who is familiar with the writings of aristotle knows his views on homosexuality."
Proof of what? That he never ate a whole raw pig, 'cause he didn't write about that, either.You refered to the "nicomachean ethics" and "Politics." In both of these works he speaks of his loathing of homosexuality. He does not say he never partook. You seem to have inferred that he hadn't. Where is your proof?
That's pure conjecture, though. Doing drugs is commonplace today. Does that mean I routinely smoke pot? Or that I have even tried it just once?I was not there, but I submit he did partake, as it was common place, resulting in his disdain for it.