Verizon defends decision to offer incest and child themed porn on video-on-demand | Fox News
O, great, my Verizon payment is going for this....
O, great, my Verizon payment is going for this....
Well, you know, if it's ok to murder them prior to birth it's probably ok to molest and abuse them later on. I mean, at least they're not dead like the murdered ones.
Note: for those few of you incapable of total thought, this is huge sarcasm to make a point.
Probably only if you are one of the ones watching it ...O, great, my Verizon payment is going for this....
I don't care if they offer porn, but how can they defend child pornography, which is illegal?
[Because "it's a good decision for the shareholders, as it increases profits"?]
If you read the article there is no child pornography, just a bunch of right wing Bible thumpers getting upset about porn in general so when a title has the word teen in it they call it child pornography. These would be the same type of people that started witch hunts.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app
If you read the article there is no child pornography, just a bunch of right wing Bible thumpers getting upset about porn in general so when a title has the word teen in it they call it child pornography. These would be the same type of people that started witch hunts.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app
We don't know if there is child pornography or not, from the few titles listed, but it's my feeling that men who are attracted to 'child themed' and 'child like' porn are creepy degenerates.
Sex is for consenting adults, and children and teens are off limits - period, no exceptions. Making a 19 year old 'look' like a preteen is pandering to sick desires, and nothing good can come of it, for those making and/or viewing it.
Oh, there's a whole bunch of 'em I didn't post.
I'm pushin' it as it is.