Wonder if Monger has left the country yet.
Supreme Court strikes down DOMA provision denying benefits to gay couples | Fox News
Supreme Court strikes down DOMA provision denying benefits to gay couples | Fox News
No Dave, but GOD certainly has this ruling has clearly demostrated that the US is entering a period of Judgement.
The financial colapse was just a shot across the bow, the impending dollar implossion will bring Famine, Pestilence and Civil War I think.
I believe that the US is the final beast spoke of in Revalation, which basically means there really isn't anywhere to go. GOD works slowly but its going to be an interesting decade.
No Dave, but GOD certainly has this ruling has clearly demostrated that the US is entering a period of Judgement.
The financial colapse was just a shot across the bow, the impending dollar implossion will bring Famine, Pestilence and Civil War I think.
I believe that the US is the final beast spoke of in Revalation, which basically means there really isn't anywhere to go. GOD works slowly but its going to be an interesting decade.
The Roaring 20s?OK I have to ask what was the great depression for?
The Roaring 20s?
It's the God Phone. Some people have a special hotline.
Might wanna have a look at that thing about Lot and his daughters ... starts at Genesis 19:30 ...Not to be nit picky, but I am not aware of the bible addressing drug use?
When the federal government began taxing married and unmarried couples differently, and when the federal government made certain benefits marital-status dependent.When did marriage, in any form, become the responsibility of the Federal government?
Certainly should be, and other than taxes, benefits and anti-discrimination laws, it still is. They are not (yet) invoking the "Full Faith and Credit" clause to require states to recognize same-sex marriages if they don't want to. But I bet that one's coming down the pike sooner or later.It certainly is not addressed in the Constitution, and since it is not, it remains a state's right issue. Same as abortion.
The problems with that statement are many. For one, abortion doesn't fall under any heading of murder, except for invented characterizations of it. Something isn't murder just because you label it as such. There are no historical precedents, in Christianity or secular circles, where abortion is murder. For the better part of 2000 years Christianity was fine with abortion. Abortions were certainly performed before, during and after Biblical times, but nary a word about it in the Bible. It wasn't until a little over one hundred years ago that someone decided it was wrong, and not unsurprisingly the flock quickly boarded that boat.Dave,
Abortion falls under the heading of murder. Abortion is just a technical medical term for ripping a live baby appart with a vaccume or coathanger. "A rose by any other name, still smells sweet"
Just because I don't believe in the same theology as you and agree with how you think, doesn't mean I'm ignorant of it. Quite the contrary. My theistic decisions and beliefs are not made lightly, ignorantly, nor blindly.Turtle,
Your ignorance of theology is always entertaining especially because you are always adamant in your ridiculous condemnations of it.
Yes, I'm aware of that, and my statement still stands. The statement that "the US is entering a period of Judgement," holds just as much truth and weight today as that and similar statements have had every time it's been uttered over the last 2000 or so years.Judgement Day is a specific 'day' coming in the future when Christ returns.
Being under GODs Judgement, is a phrase used to descibe a condition where GOD pulls back his grace from a person or society, it is the opposite of being under blessing. Generally, speaking societies under judgement 'consume themselves' and are then thrashed by outside forces.
What makes your sober scholarship any more accurate or refined than the scholarship of countless thousands (maybe millions) before you who have wrongly identified the same final beast in Revelation? So far, everyone who has ever identified The Final Beast has been dead wrong. They have a batting average of .000 and they haven't even drawn a walk to get on base. Nobody has been close. What makes you think that, this time, you are?As for my thoughts on the US being represented as the final beast in Revelation, its sober scholarship, and it gives me no pleasure to say it.
Well, that manuscript was published after his death and against his wishes. He felt his interpretations of Scripture for prophecy were the only true and correct interpretations, and that no one else really had the understanding of Prophesy that he did. The "Observations upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John" was a companion treatise of "Rules for interpreting the words & language in Scripture" which he also did not publish, nor did he want it published (but of course it was anyway, after his death). In that manuscript he details all the necessary requirements for what he considered to be the "proper" interpretation of the Bible, and if any of those requirements were not met or his procedures were not followed exactly, the interpretations would necessarily be wrong and "very likely dangerous." That's why he didn't want those published.Isaac Newton, wrote one of the best explanations of biblical prophecy you'll read. I believe it was called "Observations on the Prophet Daniel and the Revalation of St. John", he takes you from Persia to the final collapse of Catholic political power in France. Its a fascinating book especially for those interested in history. His view was the final beast had yet to show itself, but as one beast always came on the heals of the previous one it ought to be growing in his day.
"Who is like the beast, and who is able to make war with him"