Sorry the awareness is gone but I don't think that the idea that a mobile truck service should be writing scrips to sell products without further investigation for the patient by a doctor who does not actually have a connection to a medical supplier who supplies the truck - there is a bit of an ethics issue that pops up and for that it should not return.
Sleep Apnea is not the biggest issue we face as drivers on the medical front, seeing there is little proof that it has effected us as drivers as many in the medical world has been stating (another ethics issue) but more so there is absolutely no proof that it has caused one accident in this profession. The mitigation program is out of control and forces the driver to take steps that restrict them based on their performance with one test and there is a serious rights issue with the idea that they can monitor the usage of equipment when it is a prescribed device.
IF OOIDA wants to fight for something, then it is the intrusion and limitations of the drivers with medical issues based on false science, but they seem to worry about EOBR and other trivial things.