It's hanging down and danglin' and slapping the post about a third of the way down. As for disputing what you've said, thanks, but I'm fine without it. I did that once, and you dismissed irrefutable facts because they didn't agree with your preconceived notions and beliefs. Besides, there are really very few facts in the hissy fit above. There are eight, possibly nine factual errors in your first paragraph alone. There are a few facts in the post, but mainly only to be used as a vehicle for a troll-like rant laden with buzzword and phrases to get others wound up. A simple discussion of the facts without the biased editorial comments would be much preferred. Except, for mer personally, how many advertisers Rush does or does not have, what he does or does not say, nor whether is is or is not on the air, I couldn't care less.
Frankly, I'm far more concerned and interested in the fact that Obama, Holder and the administration has suddenly, after more than 230 years, has suddenly and simply redefined the term "due process" to mean "having thought about it".
"I mean really, calling me names has nothing to do with the topic I introduced,does it?"
I wouldn't think so, no, you troll-like person, you.