California's reparations task force voted Saturday to approve recommendations on how the state may compensate and apologize to Black residents for generations of harm caused by discriminatory policies.
If the task force is truly concerned about curing past racial injustices with an apology and present-day wealth transfers, Native Americans should be first in line. All land white people took from them should be fully returned. That can be accomplished with a stoke of the legislative pen and the governor's signature. Simply void all existing land deeds and deed the land to the surviving tribes.
The notion that the descendants should pay for the sins of their ancestors is ludicrous. If you rob a bank, we do not jail your children. We jail you, because you were the one who committed the crime.
Also, where do you draw the line? If the descendants of African Americans who were in California before 1900 are eligible, how is that fair to the descendants of those who were in the state in later years but still suffered under the discriminatory laws and practices then in place?
And if reparations for past sins are in order, what about women? They did not receive the right to vote until 1920. Is not disenfranchising an entire class of people based on gender not also a grievous ancestor sin that cries out for reparations? Should not the descendants of all disenfranchised women also receive reparations?
More Info
If the task force is truly concerned about curing past racial injustices with an apology and present-day wealth transfers, Native Americans should be first in line. All land white people took from them should be fully returned. That can be accomplished with a stoke of the legislative pen and the governor's signature. Simply void all existing land deeds and deed the land to the surviving tribes.
The notion that the descendants should pay for the sins of their ancestors is ludicrous. If you rob a bank, we do not jail your children. We jail you, because you were the one who committed the crime.
Also, where do you draw the line? If the descendants of African Americans who were in California before 1900 are eligible, how is that fair to the descendants of those who were in the state in later years but still suffered under the discriminatory laws and practices then in place?
And if reparations for past sins are in order, what about women? They did not receive the right to vote until 1920. Is not disenfranchising an entire class of people based on gender not also a grievous ancestor sin that cries out for reparations? Should not the descendants of all disenfranchised women also receive reparations?
California task force OKs reparations plan that could cost state $800B
“Reparations are not only morally justifiable, but they have the potential to address long standing racial disparities and inequalities,” Rep. Barbara Lee said during the meeting.
nypost.com
More Info
Last edited: