Random Drug Tests

BEARTRUCKER

Seasoned Expediter
It was aimed at nurse aides that tripped/slipped/fell. who then tried to get worker's comp. If they claimed an injury, then we'd send them to the ER which did a whiz quiz to rule out drunk or high staff. If they where drunk or high or hung over - we didn't want them caring for the elderly. The pre-employment quizes did just that. You'd be surprised at the number of positives that came back by good applicants! It was a condition of employement for them/me.
If we suspected a staff member of being drun or high, we'd send them for a quiz. They had an hour do do it, if they refused or didn't show for it, they new NOT to come back to work.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
EVERY elected official, reguardless of party, should be subject to EVERY law they pass, period. I just threw the Obama stuff in for TWO reasons: 1, he is the one in office now and 2, HE is the one who has admitted to heavy drug use.

OVM, when did I EVER say I agreed with the Patriot Act?

Drug testing may be a fact of the trucking world today, BUT, that does not make it right.

It assumes guilt, we are susposed to by innocent until proven guilty. We cannot, under the Constitution, be searched etc without probable cause. Why do we let them get away with this stuff?

Layoutshooter
 

BEARTRUCKER

Seasoned Expediter
And it all started because the very first person agreed to do it....wonder who that was? How different it could be if they'd stood on their rights instead of caving in to the "common good" or the infamous excuse' If you have nothing to hide"

I had/have nothing to hide, thats why I do them.
Came back clean 100% of the time EVERY time.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I too have nothing to hide, I too come back clean everytime. That is not relevent to the arguement. They should not have the athority to bypass due process. Period. Layoutshooter
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
EVERY elected official, reguardless of party, should be subject to EVERY law they pass, period. I just threw the Obama stuff in for TWO reasons: 1, he is the one in office now and 2, HE is the one who has admitted to heavy drug use.

OVM, when did I EVER say I agreed with the Patriot Act?

Drug testing may be a fact of the trucking world today, BUT, that does not make it right.

It assumes guilt, we are susposed to by innocent until proven guilty. We cannot, under the Constitution, be searched etc without probable cause. Why do we let them get away with this stuff?

Layoutshooter

I don't think you were a member when it was passed...I remember people saying things like.."if you have nothing to hide I don't see a problem with it....Like no search warrants, being held without cause, wiretaps without a court order..and so forth....just a bite of the Constitution...
Whist the reason was well intended..the road to heII is paved with good intention too....
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I too have nothing to hide, I too come back clean everytime. That is not relevent to the arguement. They should not have the athority to bypass due process. Period. Layoutshooter

Exactly...whilst good intentioned....its an asumption of wrong doing till you prove other wise.....THEY should have to prove their is a reason for the tests...its all backwards...
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I must be getting old, OVM, member of what? I have never been elected to public office and have never been in a position to pass a law such as the Patriot Act. I would not have either. layoutshooter
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I must be getting old, OVM, member of what? I have never been elected to public office and have never been in a position to pass a law such as the Patriot Act. I would not have either. layoutshooter

Member of this forum in 2002....when the PA was passed....


BTW look what you started with this topic!!*LOL* Everyones clicking away...Lawrence is happy...good moderating Joe!!!:D
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
No, I was not a member then. It did stir it up eh? Just arguing a principle. Funny just how that makes so many so mad. Layoutshooter
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
I am not including you Joe because you weren't here...but most of the lefties agreed with the PA....well you know because of attack.....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I can tell you from my experience that there were major problems with our ability to "monitor" terrorists. It is NOT as easy as it may seem. While I DO NOT like much of what I read about the PA there was and is a need to modernize our intell systems and laws.

It is a VERY fine line to walk. How to provide the proctection from those who would kill us and still protect our freedoms and civil rights. Many of the lines have become blurred over the years.

We must come up with an answer. The PA might have gone to far and now we are almost giving terrorists a license to kill without any effort to stop them. I don' trust ANY politition and trust Obama less than any.

Layoutshooter
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
i mean the Jimmy Dean breakfast bowls...saugage and biscuit gravy...andything in a can or box....all them frozen meals...just loaded with salt....fast food....one Wendys little stacker is 800mg's and 400 for the small fries is 50% of the daily requirement in 2 bits!!
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Yeah, that stuff will kill ya. Tonight we are going to do pork chops in the Rocket Grill and a package of steamer veggies. Real food for real people!! Layoutshooter
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Those steamers are pretty handy....I've stocked up on Mrs Dashes spices to experiment with flavor without the salt....
Eating more fruit and drinking more water....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Drink more BEER!! Beer is just "enhanced" water!!!!! :D Yep, we are doing much of the same thing. Layoutshooter
 
Top