For current owner operators of vans and sprinter type vans;
Please arrange in order of importance the reasons behind your decision to become an owner operator…
· Higher net income
· The ability to accept or deny load offers and manage your time
· The pride of vehicle/business ownership
· (fill in the blank) What other factors are important to you as an O/O
For current drivers of fleet vans;
If you had the financial resources to own your own Van/Sprinter type van, would you choose to become an owner/operator or would you choose to remain a fleet driver?
Now for all drivers;
Assuming your annual net income as a fleet driver was equal to or within $5000 your earnings as an owner/operator which option would you choose?
Thanks in advance for providing your reponses.
Tom Robertson
A. Blair Enterprises
Louisville/Cleveland
IMO, it's always about the money. For everyone. The shipper wants to pay less and the o/o wants more and the middle man wants the biggest cut they can get and to get that pay less to the next in line.
The higher the percentage of ROI the more the o/o can maintain the vehicle properly and replace it when the time comes.
Also the o/o can have a better quality of life.
As with any business, making decisions that leads to a greater ROI is critical to the success of that business. Time management is a result of a greater ROI. The less the ROI the more the o/o has to stay out.
For me transparency of the company I'm leased to is 3rd.
What I mean by this is, am I being paid the correct rate of what is being billed the shipper, not the in house brokerage. I know of 3 carriers that make it a common practice, not on every load that I am aware of, that brings in a load to the brokerage then it goes to the carrier at a reduced rate then to the o/o. These 3 are all percentage pay carriers.
It doesn't matter if the o/o is with a fixed rate carrier if they are paid atleast their agreed rate. It could matter when it come to accessorial charges.
As far as close to or up to $5000 difference between being a driver or o/o depends on whether it is a W2 or 1099. In the 90s I was a big truck driver with 2 nationwide carriers. Both were W2 with great benefits, but the RPM difference between the two was .11 pm. Both required 5 weeks out for 5 days off or you lose your truck. Not your job, but your truck. So if you want to take 2 weeks off, clean out the truck. You may or may not get a good truck when you get back. That said, if it's a W2 with benefits and within 5k, I would strongly consider it.
I would have to think long and hard on being a 1099 driver. That net difference could end up in uncle Sams pocket as the expenses are less available to the driver for write off. Depending on income, health insurance premiums (because of Obama care requirements) come into play. That could eat up all or most of that net difference real fast if the driver doesn't qualify for subsidies.
So if a driver was to make a net equal to an o/o, the net net could be way less than that of a o/o depending on individual circumstances due to tax implications and Obama Care. In fact could end up with more out of pocket. On the other hand, a driver doesn't have any risk associated with being an o/o other than personal liability in the event of an accident. Doesn't have to worry about replacing a blown motor or a tow bill. This is not to say that a fleet driver shouldn't look to make the owner a profit.