Protecting our children.

[AMonger]

"The last numbers you heard". Better do some research. You aren't anywhere close. Even your numbers make no sense. If gays as a total make 3 percent of the population as you state, then there is no way of that number you get to 40 percent as being child molesters.
If we are to use that 40 percent number, then there is quite a few females involved in that behavior as well.
Guess what? Not buying it for a minute.

You need to pay closer attention. I didn't say 40% of sodomites are molesters. 40% of molestations are committed by homosexual sodomites, so there is a lot of serial offending going on, but that's true of heterosexual molesters, too.

 

[AMonger]

I ENJOY SAYING I TOLD YOU SO, SO: I TOLD YOU SO. The push to normalize pedophiles in society's eyes--the natural next step after normalizing sodomites--HAS BEGUN!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...uld-be-allowed-to-adopt-Theresa-May-told.html

 

[AMonger]

I TOLD YOU SO Redux. Man argues incestuous relationship should be protected just like homosexuality.

http://patdollard.com/2013/04/it-be...ationship-with-daughter-to-homosexual-rights/

 

[asjssl]

No, because they're gay/deviants. They admittedly engage in perverted sex acts. How could you possibly allow them around children, even if you didn't suspect the harm would be physical and direct?

There are gay women ..so they should not be allowed around little girls...or is it just gay men. Mollesting all the little boys..again I would be focusing on your religious leaders ..that seems to be where all the shenanigans are happening..

 

[asjssl]

Why are you so hung up on this subject anyway....that's the creepy part..you should be put on the "not to be trusted list" for that reason..creepy...hmmmmm

 

[asjssl]

I TOLD YOU SO Redux. Man argues incestuous relationship should be protected just like homosexuality.

http://patdollard.com/2013/04/it-be...ationship-with-daughter-to-homosexual-rights/

What..there are weirdos arguing goofy logic all the time....seem familiar??

 

[AMonger]

There are gay women ..so they should not be allowed around little girls...or is it just gay men. Mollesting all the little boys..again I would be focusing on your religious leaders ..that seems to be where all the shenanigans are happening..

For whatever reason, it appears to be principally men, but whether that's just a matter of appearance, who knows?
But in addition to the risk of molestation, there's also the natural conclusion one would draw that children raised by sodomites would likely be raised to be godless, believing that sodomy is natural, condemning their souls to hell. So to disallow sodomites access to children is to protect children both physically and spiritually.

 

[AMonger]

Why are you so hung up on this subject anyway....that's the creepy part..you should be put on the "not to be trusted list" for that reason..creepy...hmmmmm

Because it's become an issue. Twenty years ago, it wasn't an issue. But because sodomites have forced their perversion on society, endangering the welfare of children, here we are.
It would be nice if no one was ever violent or victimized anyone in any way. We could get rid of cops, jails, courts, judges, etc. But because the actors do what they do, society is forced to address it. Same thing. Society would be willing to look the other way while perverts sodomized each other in secret -- "keeping their private lives private" -- but no, they have to force their perversion on the rest of us. Had they not done so, this subject wouldn't even be an issue.
It wasn't that long ago that mainstream newspapers started running personal ads, and it was shocking when they started the "men looking for men" category. Again, had they kept their private lives and parts to themselves, we wouldn't have this topic to discuss.
The very idea that a sex pervert should be allowed to be near children while somebody who objects to it is the one to be watched...staggering perversion of logic. But I guess if you tolerate perversion in one area, it shouldn't be surprising if that perversion carries over to your thinking.

 

[davekc]

For whatever reason, it appears to be principally men, but whether that's just a matter of appearance, who knows?

And there lies the central problem to your argument. "who knows". Even your related links only indicate that a individual or small group have a agenda. That is really nothing new or representive of any of the larger groups regardless of what side of the issue you are on.
Your articles also don't support this 4 in 10 molestations are commited by the gay community.
Keep in mind as I have said before, I am not for or against gay marriage because it doesn't effect me.
It only effects those that allow it to.

 

[AMonger]

And there lies the central problem to your argument. "who knows". Even your related links only indicate that a individual or small group have a agenda. That is really nothing new or representive of any of the larger groups regardless of what side of the issue you are on.

Oh, I'm sure it is a small portion of the group...today. It's a trickle now, just like those newspaper personal ads among sodomites publicly searching for other sodomites was a trickle 20 years ago. Wasn't it just in the 70s that the preponderance of psychiatrists with a vote in the matter voted to remove homosexuality from the MSM, no longer considering it a mental pathology? Give them time.
Trickles become floods, and the gates are open. Just as "We want abortions to be safe, legal, and rare, for women in crisis pregnancies" turned into 15-year-olds assisting in abortions where live babies have their spinal cords snipped; and just as "We want the disadvantaged to have access to healthcare" inevitably leads to death panels, this whisper of legal rights for pedophiles will become a scream. Aren't they just wired differently? Who are we to deny them their rights when they were born that way? How long before psychiatrists suggest removing another set of perverts from the MSM?

Your articles also don't support this 4 in 10 molestations are commited by the gay community.

That's not from those articles. It's been a known statistic for decades. In the age of google, can find it.

 

[LDB]

A portion of the Hippocratic Oath, pledged by every doctor upon graduation. Many would prefer this part of the oath be forgotten.

"I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy."

 

[AMonger]

A portion of the Hippocratic Oath, pledged by every doctor upon graduation. Many would prefer this part of the oath be forgotten.

"I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect. Similarly I will not give to a woman an abortive remedy."

Unfortunately, not all doctors take the Hippocratic Oath. In fact, I bet most don't any more, the anti-abortion language perhaps being a big reason why.

 

[RLENT]

Unfortunately, not all doctors take the Hippocratic Oath. In fact, I bet most don't any more, the anti-abortion language perhaps being a big reason why.

The anti-abortion language isn't in the modern version of the oath:

NOVA | The Hippocratic Oath Today

 

[LDB]

Oh, the abortion language isn't in the Kevorkian Gosnell medical oath? It's in the Hippocratic oath. Anything "modern" and incomplete is no different than "affirmative action" and other leftist rewrites. It's not the Hippocratic oath though.

 

[Humble2drive]

Oh, the abortion language isn't in the Kevorkian Gosnell medical oath? It's in the Hippocratic oath. Anything "modern" and incomplete is no different than "affirmative action" and other leftist rewrites. It's not the Hippocratic oath though.

You seem to be saying that the original Hippocratic oath which is from the 4th century B.C. should be utilized in it's unchanged form?
If so, then you must renew your faith in the Greek Gods Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia and Panacea since that is who they were pledging to.
Along with the "abortive remedy" phrase it also contained a phrase to "not engage in surgery". Is that still relevant?

 

[RLENT]

You seem to be saying that the original Hippocratic oath which is from the 4th century B.C. should be utilized in it's unchanged form?
If so, then you must renew your faith in the Greek Gods Apollo, Asclepius, Hygieia and Panacea since that is who they were pledging to.
Along with the "abortive remedy" phrase it also contained a phrase to "not engage in surgery". Is that still relevant?

Well, yeah ... that surgery thingie just might be a little problematic ...

My memory ain't zactly what it used to be ... but what was Pappy's speciality anyways ?

 

[LDB]

As the original is written it doesn't say no surgery it says leaving that to a surgeon just as is typical practice today.