President O'Biden

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Just a bit more about Joe Biden; true, he's easy to ignore - the media gives him cover and he never has anything interesting to say. In years past he was a blowhard and a dullard (like many politicians). He graduated at the bottom of his class in law school - 76th out of 85 (11th percentile).

Today, Biden is a stooge for nameless, faceless operatives of the Democrat party. He can't complete a sentence or a thought, but he signs legislation and executive orders for radically liberal policies that are ruining our culture and our nation. He makes very few decisions on his own - he's told what to say and what to do down to the type of shoes to wear.

It might be wise to pay attention to Joe Biden; he's the Democrat party.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
He's not doing the right thing voluntarily. The court is forcing him to pay child support (retroactively) and set up the college fund as part of the settlement. Otherwise he would have been in contempt.
But he is doing the right thing. There are far too many deadbeat dads out there who don't pay child support, even when court-ordered to do so.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
All things considered, as she gets older she probably won't want to use her father's name.
I think otherwise. Millions of people voted for Biden. In the years ahead, being the granddaughter of a former president will open countless doors that would otherwise be closed. In every class she attends, every job she has, and everything she is involved with in the community, she will be given special status simply because people like being close to fame.

Imagine being at a party and one of Clint Eastwood's children walks in. Word would immediately spread that she was in the room. People would greet and treat her differently than they do others without that connection to fame. That's the dynamic.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: danthewolf00

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I think otherwise. Millions of people voted for Biden. In the years ahead, being the granddaughter of a former president will open countless doors that would otherwise be closed. In every class she attends, every job she has, and everything she is involved with in the community, she will be given special status simply because people like being close to fame.
In this case, she would more likely be associated with infamy. Her grandfather's presidency isn't over yet, but history will likely judge it as one of abject failure. Also, millions voted against him and might remember her father as the scum of the earth.
Imagine being at a party and one of Clint Eastwood's children walks in. Word would immediately spread that she was in the room. People would greet and treat her differently than they do others without that connection to fame. That's the dynamic.
Bad comparison. Eastwood is a living legend, maybe the greatest actor/director ever. His legitimate children would command that kind of favorable attention. OTOH, Hunter Biden is a complete loser and has never accomplished anything on his own. Maybe an illegitimate child of Jeffrey Epstein would be a more appropriate example.

Regarding Grandpa Joe, his legacy will be remarkably forgettable - unlike that of Clint Eastwood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00

danthewolf00

Veteran Expediter
But he is doing the right thing. There are far too many deadbeat dads out there who don't pay child support, even when court-ordered to do so.
They had to take hunter to court over child support several times even after the DNA test showed the child was his....because he fought it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muttly

danthewolf00

Veteran Expediter
I think otherwise. Millions of people voted for Biden. In the years ahead, being the granddaughter of a former president will open countless doors that would otherwise be closed. In every class she attends, every job she has, and everything she is involved with in the community, she will be given special status simply because people like being close to fame.

Imagine being at a party and one of Clint Eastwood's children walks in. Word would immediately spread that she was in the room. People would greet and treat her differently than they do others without that connection to fame. That's the dynamic.
No that will be a sad life......I can see why hunter is on drugs.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
In this case, she would more likely be associated with infamy. Her grandfather's presidency isn't over yet, but history will likely judge it as one of abject failure. Also, millions voted against him and might remember her father as the scum of the earth.

Bad comparison. Eastwood is a living legend, maybe the greatest actor/director ever. His legitimate children would command that kind of favorable attention. OTOH, Hunter Biden is a complete loser and has never accomplished anything on his own. Maybe an illegitimate child of Jeffrey Epstein would be a more appropriate example.

Regarding Grandpa Joe, his legacy will be remarkably forgettable - unlike that of Clint Eastwood.
Your negative opinion of Biden is clear. But there are millions who look up to the man. When Biden's grand daughter Navy comes of age, many Biden supporters would be interested in meeting her and she would be warmly received by them.

When I was politically involved at a high level, I saw this personally many times. It does not matter if someone is seen as a "good" public figure or "bad." Fame or a connection to fame is a draw for many people.

That draw singles out for special attention the person who is famous or connected to fame. Even if the famous person was a hapless buffoon, or a convicted criminal, or a horrific public figure, fame, or a connection to it, creates a special interest. Depending on the person who has it, that special interest may be welcome or unwelcome. But it is a card that can be played to the person's advantage if the person chooses to use it in that way.

Notice all the true-crime shows made about famous criminals. Fame isn't about being a good person or bad. If you have it or have a connection to it, you have a card to play ordinary people do not.

"I've always said that there is no such thing as bad publicity." Donald Trump

"Any publicity is better than no publicity." Donald Trump

If you have a claim to fame, you have a card you can play in whatever you do in life.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
If you have a claim to fame, you have a card you can play in whatever you do in life.
Unless her mother relocates to a deep blue state like CA or NY, she'll be raised in Arkansas as the illegitimate child of a drug addicted :censoredsign:monger whose nude pictures will remain on the internet forever. It's highly unlikely that her mother - the former call girl who her father can't remember - will describe her daddy or his family in a favorable light, if she even mentions them at all. By the time she's in her early teens, she'll realize she's the product of an illicit liason and will need years of therapy to to be able to cope with it.

No one can predict what the future holds for this poor kid, but the Biden card is one she probably won't want to play - it's a loser.
 

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Unless her mother relocates to a deep blue state like CA or NY, she'll be raised in Arkansas as the illegitimate child of a drug addicted :censoredsign:monger whose nude pictures will remain on the internet forever. It's highly unlikely that her mother - the former call girl who her father can't remember - will describe her daddy or his family in a favorable light, if she even mentions them at all. By the time she's in her early teens, she'll realize she's the product of an illicit liason and will need years of therapy to to be able to cope with it.

No one can predict what the future holds for this poor kid, but the Biden card is one she probably won't want to play - it's a loser.
As you acknowledge, no one can predict the outcome, and the scenario you paint is as plausible as the one I imagine, which has a happier outcome for the daughter, Navy. There are lots of kids whose parents are of questionable character. While life can be hard for them, many manage to live respectable lives, and in many cases, they turn out to be far better parents than the ones they had.

At age 18, Navy will have the legal right to change her name to Biden and no one can stop that. If she sees it then to her advantage to do so, she would likely do that. A lot can happen between now and then, and further speculation about Navy's quality of life is a waste of time.

At present, while I condemn Hunter for being a deadbeat dad and Grandpa Joe for not acknowledging this innocent child for four years, I am glad circumstances have taken the turn they have. The girl will know who her father and mother are, and, as long as the mother proves responsible, and Hunter pays his child support, Navy and her mother will receive the financial support needed to raise a child in a financially secure way. That's more than a lot of children have whose mothers are single and parents have checkered backgrounds.

Regarding nude pictures on the internet, you're pulling out all the stops against Hunter, aren't you? But this point is a glancing blow at best. I'm old enough to remember life before the internet. And I remember when Jenny Cam or something like that first came out. A woman put cameras in her apartment and, for a subscription fee, people could look in on her live. That was headline news at the time and she made a ton of money. Immitators and innovators followed in droves. Since then, how many millions of people have put nude pictures of themselves on the internet (for free or for money)? How many have made sex tapes and posted those too? While I'm no fan if it, this behavior seems to be increasingly common and done by parents too.

I'm not sure this has a socially redeeming benefit. If I was a teen, I would fill ill-at ease if my friends were using their phones to check out my nude parents online. But what I think does not seem to matter. And what I think is probably quite different than what teens think these days. For people in younger generations (and some in my own generation), this is an increasingly accepted thing.

And besides, if Marjorie Taylor Greene finds it acceptable to blow Hunter's uncensored, X-rated, nude photos up to poster size and display them for public view in the U.S. House of Representatives, who are you to consider those photos as something bad to have online?
 
Last edited:

danthewolf00

Veteran Expediter
As you acknowledge, no one can predict the outcome, and the scenario you paint is as plausible as the one I imagine, which has a happier outcome for the daughter, Navy. There are lots of kids whose parents are of questionable character. While life can be hard for them, many manage to live respectable lives, and in many cases, they turn out to be far better parents than the ones they had.

At age 18, Navy will have the legal right to change her name to Biden and no one can stop that. If she sees it then to her advantage to do so, she would likely do that. A lot can happen between now and then, and further speculation about Navy's quality of life is a waste of time.

At present, while I condemn Hunter for being a deadbeat dad and Grandpa Joe for not acknowledging this innocent child for four years, I am glad circumstances have taken the turn they have. The girl will know who her father and mother are, and, as long as the mother proves responsible, and Hunter pays his child support, Navy and her mother will receive the financial support needed to raise a child in a financially secure way. That's more than a lot of children have whose mothers are single and parents have checkered backgrounds.

Regarding nude pictures on the internet, you're pulling out all the stops against Hunter, aren't you? But this point is a glancing blow at best. I'm old enough to remember life before the internet. And I remember when Jenny Cam or something like that first came out. A woman put cameras in her apartment and, for a subscription fee, people could look in on her live. That was headline news at the time and she made a ton of money. Immitators and innovators followed in droves. Since then, how many millions of people have put nude pictures of themselves on the internet (for free or for money)? How many have made sex tapes and posted those too? While I'm no fan if it, this behavior seems to be increasingly common and done by parents too.

I'm not sure this has a socially redeeming benefit. If I was a teen, I would fill ill-at ease if my friends were using their phones to check out my nude parents online. But what I think does not seem to matter. And what I think is probably quite different than what teens think these days. For people in younger generations (and some in my own generation), this is an increasingly accepted thing.

And besides, if Marjorie Taylor Greene finds it acceptable to blow Hunter's uncensored, X-rated, nude photos up to poster size and display them for public view in the U.S. House of Representatives, who are you to consider those photos as something bad to have online?
Seeing how they did trump I don't see anything wrong with Republicans doing the same to Democrats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muttly

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Another victim of Bidenomics - somewhat; Yellow Freight has closed it's doors after 99 years of being in business and about 15 years of poor management, struggles with Teamsters, and $700M in govt Covid bailouts. They were hanging by a financial thread anyway, but considering current inflation, rise in fuel costs, stagnant economic conditions leading to declining numbers of shipments and the latest threats of a strike by the union, 30,000 employees and 22,000 drivers are out of work and businesses across the country are left with stranded freight that won't get delivered anytime soon.

 
  • Angry
Reactions: muttly

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Regarding nude pictures on the internet, you're pulling out all the stops against Hunter, aren't you?
No, these are points relating to the character of this guy that have been made repeatedly in the media for over a year.
But this point is a glancing blow at best. I'm old enough to remember life before the internet. And I remember when Jenny Cam or something like that first came out. A woman put cameras in her apartment and, for a subscription fee, people could look in on her live. That was headline news at the time and she made a ton of money. Immitators and innovators followed in droves. Since then, how many millions of people have put nude pictures of themselves on the internet (for free or for money)? How many have made sex tapes and posted those too? While I'm no fan if it, this behavior seems to be increasingly common and done by parents too.
A "glancing blow"? Seriously? These pics and videos were selfies he posted of himself and his adventures with prostitutes and using illegal drugs, not nanny cam videos or teenage sexting. They send a clear picture of the demented mindset, lack of character and integrity, and acute impairment of an individual that was being trusted with high-level political and financial deals involving leaders of foreign countries and large corporations both foreign and domestic. What makes this relevant is that Joe Biden had to know what condition his son was in and the financial deals he was conducting that involved the Biden family. To dismiss this skulduggery as being "increasingly common" is a Clinton-like rationalization on steroids.
And besides, if Marjorie Taylor Greene finds it acceptable to blow Hunter's uncensored, X-rated, nude photos up to poster size and display them for public view in the U.S. House of Representatives, who are you to consider those photos as something bad to have online?
The pictures MTG displayed in Congress have been the butt of public jokes for a couple of years, and probably already had been seen by everyone in the room. But it doesn't matter what I think. What matters is what the daughter thinks someday when one of her classmates asks "is that your daddy"?
 

coalminer

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I almost never look at this Biden thread because he simply does not interest me. And I don't think I have ever posted in this thread, even once.

But I rise today to do so because I just read the news about Biden acknowledging his four-year-old granddaughter (fathered by Hunter) for the first time. The way the Biden family denied this innocent girl's existence is despicable and repugnant.

Hunter says he does not remember the encounter when he fathered this child. That is plausible since he was deep into drugs at the time. Goodness knows he would not be the first American male to end up in bed with a strange woman when he was in a non-sober state.

And I do not fault him for fighting the claims that the child was his. Any man would who had no recollection of the tryst in question.

But when the DNA test proved Hunter was the father he took the path of a deadbeat dad. That's bad. Even worse was the settlement, agreed to by the mother, in which child support would be paid, but the girl would be prohibited from using her father's name.

Trying to pretend this grandchild did not exist is despicable. Preventing her from using her rightful name is also despicable.

There is nothing right or redeeming about any of this. Hunter is doing the right thing by agreeing to pay child support. It's also encouraging that the Biden family seems willing to set up a college fund for the girl. But the prior acts are disgusting.

Rant over.
If he actually didnt remember hooking up with her, then maybe she knew who he was and thought, wow I get pregnant with his child and I will be set for life. Knowing he was a drug addict, throw a date rape drug into his drink and just like that, she gets what she wants.

We dont know the whole story, but rape can go both ways but most men will not claim it.

If I was Joe and Hunter, I would be spending money trying to get that child away from her.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: danthewolf00

coalminer

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Just a bit more about Joe Biden; true, he's easy to ignore - the media gives him cover and he never has anything interesting to say. In years past he was a blowhard and a dullard (like many politicians). He graduated at the bottom of his class in law school - 76th out of 85 (11th percentile).

Today, Biden is a stooge for nameless, faceless operatives of the Democrat party. He can't complete a sentence or a thought, but he signs legislation and executive orders for radically liberal policies that are ruining our culture and our nation. He makes very few decisions on his own - he's told what to say and what to do down to the type of shoes to wear.

It might be wise to pay attention to Joe Biden; he's the Democrat party.
And as I said on Truth the other day, there is only one person responsible for us having to deal with Biden as president, and that is Donald Trump, If he wasnt such a douche bag, he would have been re-elected.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: danthewolf00

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
And as I said on Truth the other day, there is only one person responsible for us having to deal with Biden as president, and that is Donald Trump, If he wasnt such a douche bag, he would have been re-elected.
Your count is a bit off. It's 2,001. Trump and the 2000 Mules.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Until somebody can prove the mules were paid to collect votes, and that the votes themselves were fraudulent, then there were no laws broken.
Video of the same person going to multiple mailboxes depositing multiple ballots in each box while wearing gloves. Yeah, nothing suspicious or illegal going on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00

coalminer

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Video of the same person going to multiple mailboxes depositing multiple ballots in each box while wearing gloves. Yeah, nothing suspicious or illegal going on.
Even the con man that made that movie has said they cant prove they did anything illegal.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: danthewolf00

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Once again the media is agog with the latest episode of the Trump soap opera instead of the revelations of the Devon Archer testimony before a Congressional committee that further implicates Joe Biden’s direct involvement in his son's criminal activities with foreign entities. Let's remind ourselves that this is about the nefarious activity of the sitting POTUS when he was VPOTUS under Obama - influence peddling at the highest levels that resulted in monetary gains in the tens of millions of dollars. Yet these crimes are censored by the mainstream media who are obsessed with the political persecution of his main political rival in the upcoming 2024 election.

"Archer testified that Hunter Biden put the president on
speakerphone nearly 20 times when he was speaking with business associates to give the "illusion" he had access to his father.
The 20 occasions occurred over a 10-year period back when Joe Biden was serving as vice president."

 
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00
Top