PAUL well he or wont he????

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
well is he is as honest as some seem to think he will not run third party when he fails to recive the nod from the republican party.


Ron Paul on Third Party Run: ‘I Don’t Want to Do It’ | Video | TheBlaze.com

Ron Paul | third party run | GOP | The Daily Caller

Would Ron Paul run as a third-party candidate? (video) - CSMonitor.com

There are a great number of these out there where he says he wont run.That was over a month ago,Maybe this is why some members on here seem real touchy when people are pointing out why Paul will not win the nomanation.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Why worry about Paul, I would worry about Trump and others.

Even if Paul would run as a third party candidate, with the lack of a competitor in the republican field, Obama still has a good chance to win.
 

tbubster

Seasoned Expediter
Not worried in a couple of threads alot of people are talking about Paul maybe running third party just clearing it up that all.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Ahh .... I see we have more comprehensional difficulties here that need to be addressed.

Bubbie, you are taking this to a point where I'm actually beginning to feel some small degree of pity for you .... please, please for your own self-respect and dignity - just stop the madness ..... and end the continuous humiliation .....

well is he is as honest as some seem to think he will not run third party when he fails to recive the nod from the republican party. There are a great number of these out there where he says he wont run ...
Actually, what you have just stated (that "he says he won't run") is factually inaccurate - he doesn't say that at all. I suspect, if one were to invest a little effort, one could probably find a clip or two on YouTube where Dr. Paul says directly, that he has not ruled out running as a 3rd party candidate.

The reason why I suspect this, because I've actually seen and heard him say it - on national TV with my own eyes and ears .....

I'm going to address your so called "evidence" in each of the the video clips you cited:

Video No 1:

Chris Wallace quote: “Does that mean you might consider an independent run?”

Dr. Paul quote: “No, it doesn’t mean that at all, I have no intention of doing that. It doesn’t make any sense to me to even think about that, let alone plan to do that.”

(In the above exchange, Wallace ask if one thing, necessarily means another ... one can honestly answer that in the negative - but that does not mean that something else might motivate Dr. Paul to run)

Chris Wallace quote: “Because?”

Dr. Paul quote: “Because I don’t want to do it,” [Paul laughing] “That’s a pretty good reason.”

Please contrast any of the above statements by Dr. Paul with the following statement (which are my own words) and explain to me how they are the same (meaning identical) as any of Dr. Paul's comments in regards to this matter:

"I will not run as a third-party candidate, ever."

Maybe this is why some members on here seem real touchy when people are pointing out why Paul will not win the nomanation.
No, the only thing I suspect anyone on here is "touchy" about is when someone, who has repeatedly demonstrated their own inability to comprehend the English language, repeatedly makes assertions, which clearly have no basis whatsoever, in fact, in regards to what Dr. Paul did, or did not actually say.

Analysis of the remaining two videos to follow :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Regarding Video No 2.:

Hey Genius - posting two links to different articles .... that report on and refer to the same interview .... doesnt make it "more true" ....

.... why do I even bother .... :cool:
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Regarding Video No 3:

The video itself contains nothing relating to whether or not Dr. Paul will run as a 3rd party candidate. The article does however contain the following statement:

"He says he won’t run for president as a third-party candidate, because he would be excluded from the debates and because it takes great personal wealth to mount a credible independent candidacy."

The above is not a direct quote of Dr. Paul - it is therefore significantly less credible. It is not "proof" of anything - other than what the reporter wrote.

Anyone who has ever dealt personally with reporters knows how often they get things wrong ..... sometimes even intentionally, believe it or not ...... :rolleyes:

Bubbie,

If the articles you have posted here are an example of what constitutes "proof" in Bubbie-world™, you have my sincere sympathy and deepest condolences.
 
Top