I don’t want to sound like I am bashing panther but I may be just doing that, so don’t get all defensive and complain about it.
The meaning of the words independent and contractor seem to be missed in this entire thread, I see a great defense for Panther but not for the contractor.
Maybe I am just critical for the years of real independent contracting and to me just to accept that they need a disclaimer clearly illustrate a very poor business practice and the company’s spin of their need to control every aspect of the contractor’s responsibility. The contract should be written to say so some of this in the first place, the expectations should be spelt out and discussed right from the start and there should be no disclaimers thrown in after the contract is signed to cover the companies a**.
See, also I find the FedEx court cases that have been going on, and reading the details of a few of these cases they are for the most part are what I perceive as panther’s overall relationship strategy with the contractors. From all I have read, all I have heard and seen, I am glad to be where I am at.
Estimate?
The first thing that comes to mind is this, if you accept the offer to pickup a box from company A and bring it to company B, then the offer should stand regardless of the negotiation that is going on behind your back and out of your control, there should not be an estimate of anything when that offer hits your QC – period. The company should eat the difference of any charges if they accept the responsibility to cover the load. FSC or what ever was estimated when they picked up the phone, take the lost and train their sales staff and their dispatchers better so not slam the contractors with a reduction in any payout for services rendered. As much as others would defend this practice they fail to actually come up with a legitimate reason, it is cheating the contractor who has done a service for the company as part of their contract and the company has failed to live up to their obligation. I have seen it in the IT industry too much with T&M work I have been brought into to fix.
The second thing that comes to mind is the cross docking issue, I think that this again is poor training and hand holding are issues, I know of two that were not a safety issue and there was no mitigating circumstances to force a contractor to cross dock the shipment, one made absolutely no sense at all – 520 mile run, sitting the weekend, 4 miles from the pickup and forced to cross dock the shipment 150 miles en route from the pickup – can someone explain that one to me because no one could explain it to the contractor. Planning within the dispatch group of a run should take place, in my opinion, before an offer is made, not after the fact. The inconsistencies that I have heard about this issue are such that it makes me wonder what is wrong with some people there. I know this happens at other companies, but not to the level I have heard for this one.
I agree with Moot, it just doesn’t make sense. AND moot, being a solo driver in a straight truck, I have not crossed docked much but I bet I would be with Panther.
I know that no one can answer this question but I am wondering what the overall refusal percentage per active fleet at any given moment is with Panther, with a large fleet I am guessing betting that is my be as low as 52%. It really should be around 70%.