Palin's Emails Released.....
- Thread starter dieseldiva
- Start date
- Status
Not much difference as far as experience, brain power etc. Both kinda dim bulbs. Palin would likely have less evil judge picks. Other than that, A dead bug would be better than either.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
We'll put you down for a vote for Ms. Palin then.
ONLY, and I stress ONLY, IF, I stress IF, she was running against Obama. Then I would vote AGAINST Obama, not FOR Palin.
Just as I have always voted in a presidential election. I have NEVER in my lifetime voted FOR a candidate. I have ALWAYS voted against the lessor of the two evils. There has yet to be a good candidate in my voting life. We shall see this time. So far? Same old crud.
Spawn of the devil, (Obama) versus, who gives a flip? Where is that dog skeleton when you need one?
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Who is the "WE" that is putting me down for anything? It is NOT as cut and dry as you want to make it out anyway. Except how bad Obama sucks.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
witness23
Veteran Expediter
That would be him and his alter-ego Glenn.....
Just because you put a smiley face at the end of post doesn't take away the fact that you are being disrespectful.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
I'll catch heck for this but I'll live with it...
Ya know it gets old reading something from a person who doesn't contribute to the rest of the forum in any way....
That would be him and his alter-ego Glenn.....
I was not sure if the "we" was his boss or the mouse in his pocket
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Respect is not given....it's earned.
awwww......that old line of thinking, it actually says a lot about you.
I have always tried to go with; respect should always be given, but can be taken away after you have first shown it. Or, first you must give respect, to get it back. But hey, that's just me.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
I'll catch heck for this but I'll live with it...
Ya know it gets old reading something from a person who doesn't contribute to the rest of the forum in any way....
Why would you "catch heck" for saying something that is on your mind?
From your post, I am not sure who you think you would be catching heck from? To whom are you referring to? For the record, I wouldn't give you heck.
The position alone doesn't demand respect from the peasants....a leader should give respect to the people who put him in that position....he has to EARN the respect by his deeds...and obvious by this audience here he has not done so....maybe in your circles...but that is just my opinion...
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
Good for you.....that's pretty much how Ronald Reagan saw it...."trust but verify".
That is why I have NO respect for Obama. He looks on the average man like he is a pet. He needs cared for, reeducated, so he no longer needs to "cling" to old ideas. So he can be made subject to the benevolent government. He is an total disgrace to the office and the Nation.
Imagine a man, who has NEVER even held a REAL job as an adult looking down on those who slug it out in the trenches every day. Then doing all he and his administration can do to make it as hard as possible to succeed.
The useless putz!
Imagine a man, who has NEVER even held a REAL job as an adult looking down on those who slug it out in the trenches every day. Then doing all he and his administration can do to make it as hard as possible to succeed.
The useless putz!
witness23
Veteran Expediter
What position? And who are you speaking of? Myself, Diesel or Obama?
How did I know this was going to become about Obama
If you recall, Diesel makes a contemptuous statement about me and added a "smiley face". Just because you add a "smiley face" doesn't make it any less disrespectful. On top of it all, how does a statement like that add to the conversation.
As for my "We" statement. "We", would be, myself and the general audience within the Soapbox. It is generally used to refer to all people or to people in general, including the speaker.
"As for my "We" statement. "We", would be, myself and the general audience within the Soapbox. It is generally used to refer to all people or to people in general, including the speaker."
The vast majority of "us" in here, including the soapbox, are part of a much larger "we" called expediters. You don't fit into "we" very well.
Being a part of the "we" is not required to be sure, but you are kind of an "outsider" so to speak.
I doubt if you can speak for the "we".
The vast majority of "us" in here, including the soapbox, are part of a much larger "we" called expediters. You don't fit into "we" very well.
Being a part of the "we" is not required to be sure, but you are kind of an "outsider" so to speak.
I doubt if you can speak for the "we".
- Status