Obama's New Emi$$ion $tandard$

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
LOL, SURE she does!!! Besides, we are way past the age of military service. You are correct about politions and hot air. Maybe we should put "generators" in the house and senate chambers. Then we could put all that "hot air" that they spew to good use. If we did that it would be the first time in man's history that a politition would have a use. Layoutshooter
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Not really, then who would we have to blame everything on? LOL, don't get me started on "eleminating" polititions. Layoutshooter
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
I would be more for a second revolution than a military coup. How about a tax revolt? Layoutshooter
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
If you take away thier monopoly money you take away thier power. They use taxes as weapons against the working stiffs. Nothing like a really good progressive income tax to keep you in your place. Layoutshooter
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
It used to be called Global Warming. Whoops, the Global stopped Warming. Let's call it Climate Change, because nobody lives in the Global, anyway, but everyone can relate to their Climate and nobody likes Change. Climate Change sounds scarier. Plus, that way, it's not just the hot stuff that keeps getting us grant money, it's anything that's a change from the norm. Largest snowfall in 50 years? Why, that's Climate Change, of course, never mind the fact that it did it 50 years ago. Most people have never seen it, so it's a change for them! haha. Earthquake in China? Yep, Climate Change. Hurricane Katrina? Climate Change. Hurricane Camille? Well, we didn't have Global Warming and Climate Change back then, so that was just a bad storm.

They just discovered a new species of catfish in the Andes a couple of months ago when they saw it hiking up a mountainside, a new species of coelacanth (the one that's been extinct for 400 million years) was discovered 10 years ago when it was found hooked to the business end of a fishing pole, and they still, to this day, don't fully understand how aspirin works. Does anybody really and truly think that anyone understands something as complicated as global climate systems, climate systems that are affected not only by solar radiation, solar winds, variations in the Earth's rotation around the sun, volcanic eruptions, magnetic forces and gravitational forces of every planet in the solar system, and even other solar systems, but also by where our solar system happens to be at any given time within that meandering arm of the Milky Way Galaxy?

The Sahara Desert used to be a lush tropical forest. There are fossils of sea creatures in the mountains of Montana. A butterfly flaps its wings in China and it rains in Central Park. They don't know.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
That is why I don't like the ALGORE type panic. Yea, we need to clean things up but we can do it a bit slower and smarter. I still say it is just another way to control us. Layoutshooter
 

hdxpedx

Veteran Expediter
Fleet Owner
That is why I don't like the ALGORE type panic. Yea, we need to clean things up but we can do it a bit slower and smarter. I still say it is just another way to control us. Layoutshooter

ALASKA NEEDS TO CALL AL Gork AND purchase ABOUT $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 +++ carbon credits, he was right THE EARTH IS ON FIRE!! As soon as that VOLCANO blow's,oh yeah--Heavy snow in Britain means travel chaos
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
If you look at all of the solutions to Global Warming and Climate Change, they all tend to be somewhere in the neighborhood of richer countries, mainly US, redistributing wealth and the ability to exploit natural resources, to poorer countries. Follow the money, always follow the money.

As for the U in colour, flavour, honour, armour, rumour, and where it went, as an amateur wordsmith (killer oxymoron, no?), etymology and philology are interests of mine. Up until the early part of the 18th centruty the English language had no standardized (or standardised) spelling. It wasn't until the publishing of a few influential dictionaries that people began to notice the differences in spellings.

British English spelling generally follows Samuel Johnson's Dictionary of the English Language, published in 1755, whereas American English follows Noah Webster's An American Dictionary of the English Language, which was published in 1828.

Noah Webster was a strong proponent of spelling reform, as was many others of the time. These dictionaries were published during a period known as The Golden Age of Philology, where philology is to consider both form and meaning in linguistic expression, combining both linguistics and literary studies. As a consequence, to properly study literature, its meaning, a history of language must also be taken into consideration so as to be able to understand literature in context. To easy the understanding of history, as well as current and future language communications, spelling reform was needed.

Spelling reforms are often officially sanctioned or mandated changes for various reason, like making it easier for kids and immigrants to become literate, making the language more useful for international communications, even for political or cosmetically aesthetic reasons. The danger of spelling reform, of course, is that too much of a good thing can leave historical literature unreadable and unintelligible. Fortunately, old habits die hard, as in the case of the officially mandated spelling change from aeroplane to airplane, as adopted by the British Air Corps in 1928, and by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics in the US in 1916, they still use the old form within the British forces at a rate of about 7:1. Aeroplane is actually French. Go figure.

Spelling reform in Britain offered many choices, most were met with resistance, and the Norman, Anglo-French spellings were generally retained. In Johnson's dictionary, he wasn't particularly into spelling reform, but he used the spellings that were, in his opinion, best derived from all of the versions within his sources, and he simply preferred the French versions to the Latin and Greek versions, by and large.

In the US, the more simplified spellings of Websters initial dictionary took hold, where he dropped seemingly extraneous letters from many words, partly for aesthetics, and partly to set it apart from England.

Since then, any subsequent difference in spelling between the US and Britain are largely cultural.

In early drafts of the Declaration of Independence, the word "honor" is spelled "honour", so it would appear that the official final draft has a typo. Although, up until Johnson's and Websters dictionaries, honor and honour were used with the same frequency in England, and the British surname of Honor is how it is still spelled.

There are many variations other than -or and -our, of course. Center and centre, shop and shoppe, standardize and standardise, catalogue and catalog. Some are of varying origins, like Latin and Greek, but most of the non-American variations still stem from the French, which is why Canada tends to use the more French spellings for most of these, even though they have as many American English spellings as they do British English.

Both oe and ae words are used more often in England, and the extra letter is dropped here. English spellings of aenemia, diarrhoea, paediatric, encyclopaedia and midiaeval have the extra letter that anemia, diarrhea, pediatric, encyclopedia, and medieval have in the US.

The British prefer ageing, while American like aging. The UK likes sizeable, America likes sizable. Both, however, prefer lovable, datable, usable.

Oddly, though, the American spelling of aesthetics and archaeology are esthetics and archeology in England. It's a wacky world. Though, archeology is becoming more frequent here in American.

Now that we know where the U went, the more important quesiton is, when snow melts, where does the white go?
 
Top