Obama nominee trouble, SURPRISE!!!!

pelicn

Veteran Expediter
Leo, Leo, Leo...do you honestly think that Obama would nominate someone with a "shady" past? After all, he is the anointed one :rolleyes:
 

Poorboy

Expert Expediter
Leo, Leo, Leo...do you honestly think that Obama would nominate someone with a "shady" past? After all, he is the anointed one :rolleyes:

Not Obumma, He Would Never Do That!! :rolleyes: Still Haven't seen his Birth Certificate!! (Not The Phoney One That One of the Koolaid Drinkers Put Up) But The Reeeeeeeeeeeal One!! :D
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
If a nominee isn't willing to name 100% of their clients they have no business in a federal legal position. The only reason you hide something is when there's impropriety or illegality to hide.
Well that's just an utterly retarded statement - c'mon Leo .... I know you are smarter than that.

I'm all for transparency in government, and I'm no fan of Obama (sure didn't vote him for him) .... but I can see where a private individual who has sought legal counsel, might have some expectation that his name and identity would not be made public and become part of the political food fights .... merely because he retained the services of a lawyer. :cool:
 
Top