NSA, watch what you say?

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
If your neighbor works for the NSA, would you speak your mind to such a person or stay away from them as much as possible? You never know what could prompt an investigation by your NSA neighbor. He or she could be jealous of your car, your life, and so on. Just be careful, imho.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
If your neighbor works for the NSA, would you speak your mind to such a person or stay away from them as much as possible? You never know what could prompt an investigation by your NSA neighbor. He or she could be jealous of your car, your life, and so on. Just be careful, imho.

I lived right in the house with someone who worked there. Believe it or not, they are just people and have the exact same kinds of ideas, feeling etc that you do. All my non NSA friends hunting with me, fished with me, fought fires with me, ran on the ambulance crew with me etc etc etc.

On top of that, is it your understanding that everyone at NSA works on the same projects/missions etc? Nope, the do not.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
If your neighbor works for the NSA, would you speak your mind to such a person or stay away from them as much as possible? You never know what could prompt an investigation by your NSA neighbor. He or she could be jealous of your car, your life, and so on. Just be careful, imho.
I personally wouldn't care...I've done nothing illegal...and nothing to hide....besides I fall on Joe's opinion that to most of them it is just another job....if anyone has to be careful and not talk, it is THEM, not me....
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
For such a FREE country...there sure are a lot of levels of police and security forces around...NSA, FBI, SecretService US Marshalls, DHS, TSA, and then the state and local officials...I left out CIA they are SUPPOSED to be foriegn
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
For such a FREE country...there sure are a lot of levels of police and security forces around...NSA, FBI, SecretService US Marshalls, DHS, TSA, and then the state and local officials...I left out CIA they are SUPPOSED to be foriegn

NSA is not a police force. Their charter states they are not to target US citizens.

The problem is, and I am not defending the excesses we have seen of late, is that threats the nation is facing today are not as clear cut as it was when we were fighting the Soviet Union.

It is NOT a simple thing to target "terror cells", no matter where they are. Under the charters the FBI would handle the "targets" in the US and CIA/NSA would handle them outside the country.

In the old days none of the "agencies" knew what the other's were doing, that did not work, that contributed to the problems that allow the attacks on 9/11 to succeed.

The laws have not kept up with modern communications technology. The congress, as per normal, is NOT doing their jobs and defining what should or should not be done.

It is not as easy job there are a lot of "gray areas", overlaps between what used to be not allowed and allowed are far more common due to new technology and the nature of many of the threats.
 

SHARP327

Veteran Expediter
Back during the Ollie North trials the Government said there was no such thing as the NSA and said they didn't know what he was talking about....now NSA is all in your face....I guess now that Congress funds the NSA it's okay...just wondering who lies about what?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Back during the Ollie North trials the Government said there was no such thing as the NSA and said they didn't know what he was talking about....now NSA is all in your face....I guess now that Congress funds the NSA it's okay...just wondering who lies about what?

What do you mean, "now that Congress funds the NSA"? Congress has ALWAYS funded the NSA and Ollie North was NEVER employed by NSA.

NSA was NEVER a "secret". It's budget was always public record. They recruited at colleges etc.

People just never paid attention to anything, they really did not want to know or care to know.

It was a breakdown in congressional oversight that has led to the excesses we see today, coupled with the problems dealing with accelerating technology that law is not keeping up with.

Even the REALLY little known about agency, the NRO, is known to the public, only if one chooses to take the time to learn.
 

SHARP327

Veteran Expediter
I stand corrected...Ollie North worked with the NSC instead of the NSA....if the trial wasn't so darn long I'd read the transcript... that and the fact I'm not all that interested in it.
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
Interesting: side trip, in the last few weeks us vets got a large envelope wanting us to give our opinon of the VA and so on .... it says what we say or check will be held confidental.....any veteran that believes that is still shell shocked. Now if a 9 dollar an hour person is typing that stuff, how can it be confidential anymore. Just be carefull what you check on those forms and write out, just saying. Let me tell this, when I was having to be re-valuated for my medical bennies, they sent me my IRS filings/returns for 3 years, now how did they get that,,,,lol. Yep con-- fidental u betcha... PS about those IRS papers, they want to know where all your money is located, and stocks and land and homes and cars and on and on....confidental, rite..watch those neighbors that are employed with the government tooooooooooooooooooooooooo.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Their [the NSA] charter states they are not to target US citizens.
And yet they do. The problem with their charter is that they ignore half of it and the creatively interpret the other half to enable them to do whatever they want.

It was a breakdown in congressional oversight that has led to the excesses we see today, coupled with the problems dealing with accelerating technology that law is not keeping up with.
The law is keeping up with it just fine, with regard to the NSA. The problem is the NSA has been systematically obfuscating the truth and flat-out lying to the Congressional overseers.

An NSA internal audit showed the NSA violated the Constitution and/or specific court orders 2,776 times between April 2011 and March 2012. This is their own internal audit. In one NSA documents, agency personnel are instructed to remove details and substitute more generic language in reports to the Justice Department, Congress and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

The NSA has their own special definitions for things, specifically so they can use those words to make people think they mean something else.

Collection, content, data, relevant, metadata, target... these words do not mean what you think they mean, unless, of course, you have the latest copy of the Super Sekrit Unabridged NSA Dictionary, 73rd Edition.

For example, collected doesn't mean the gathering and storing of data. At the NSA, nothing is "collected" until someone sits down and processes that information into a readable form. When they do that, it's known as "tasking" the data. I have no idea what they call it when they actually "read" the data. I'm guessing it's something along the lines of "ignore the data" because at that point it's "information" and not "data." They can have boatloads of data on hand, stored on servers, and they can search all of that data for keywords and other data, but they are doing that on mountains of information they haven't even "collected" yet. So, when you ask them if they collect data on thousands or millions of Americans, they can say "no" and mean it. That's very convenient.

How about data? Most people would think data refers to a group of points of information. That is wrong. Data is content. It is what is said in a communication. It is not information about the communication. Information about the communication is metadata. Got it?

So, when Director of National Intelligence James Clapper was asked by Senator Ron Wyden if the NSA "collect any type of data at all" on Americans, Clapper responded "no," and meant it, because first of all it wasn't collected, and second, the the metadata that the NSA gathers on every phone call that takes place through every American phone provider isn't data. It's metadata. Got it?

Daily Kos: Transparency? The word games behind the defense of NSA surveillance

Senator Ron Wyden Discusses NSA Surveillance, Edward Snowden and Government Transparency | Politics News | Rolling Stone
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
"For example, collected doesn't mean the gathering and storing of data. At the NSA, nothing is "collected" until someone sits down and processes that information into a readable form. When they do that, it's known as "tasking" the data."

ALL of the above in entirely incorrect. As a former "COT" (collections operations tech), "COO" (collections operations officer) and "CM" (collection manager) I would say I have a bit more insight into this than you.

Tasking is exactly what it sounds like. Resources are tasked to collect certain "targets", "frequencies", "weapons systems" etc. ALL tasking is done on a nation priority system, Priority one targets being the MOST imported and each category lower is of less importance.

ALL tasking comes down from the civilian controlling groups, directed by the president, the congress etc. It is passed through to the agencies, then to the group within an agency, that has the responsibility for a particular task.

When I was a "CM" I handled the tasking for a group of 211 people, one of the largest groups an NSA. I had multiple targets sets within the group and a total of somewhere around 300 National priority one targets that I was responsible for.

The NRO was also involved at this point. THEY "owned" all the overhead resources and they held the ultimate responsibility of "settling disputes" on which agency, group, target set etc was allocated "time" on a "bird" or set of "birds". THOSE meetings could get "heated" at times. (I was sent to those meeting from time to time as the NSA rep, because, believe it or not, I would speak my mind without fear of offending "higher ups". They were held at Area 58, about 7 stories BELOW GROUND)

Then the tasking goes on to the collectors for collection. The "COT's/COO's" do the actual collection of the raw, unprocessed data/signals/conversations etc. They RARELY do anything beyond that. MOST of what is collected is either encrypted or in some form of advanced signal. Then there are those who ONLY collect signals, telemetry etc. Even phone systems are not just "conversations" to be heard. First you must get "into" the system and search through individual voice grade channels within that system. Many of those are as well encrypted. Collectors do not "sort" data. They may bust some call signs once in a while. ( I was NEVER good at busting call signs :()


THEN the raw data, is sent to a team of "traffic analysts" who first pull out basic information such as "net structure", as in command and control, frequency relationships etc.

The signals are sent to signals analysts to be worked on, as in trying to find ways to "get into the signal" to read underlying data.

The encrypted data is sent to the cryptoanalysts for attempts to "break" the encryption to again, allow access to underlying data.

Then there are the linguists, who do exactly what you think they would do. They transcribe collected data.

I could go on if you need some more help. LOL! That is, of course, the "nickle" version of a $1000 tour.

On a side note, Kirk Wiebe, the dude from the USA Today, was one of my supervisors when I was a collection manager. Just in case you needed to know that, and even if you didn't.
 
Last edited:

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
"For example, collected doesn't mean the gathering and storing of data. At the NSA, nothing is "collected" until someone sits down and processes that information into a readable form. When they do that, it's known as "tasking" the data."

ALL of the above in entirely incorrect. As a former "COT" (collections operations tech), "COO" (collections operations officer) and "CM" (collection manager) I would say I have a bit more insight into this than you.
And I would say that your insight is in direct opposition to not only Clapper's testimony before Congress and his and other's irrefutable actions at the NSA, but also in direct opposition to one of the NSA's founding documents: NSA United States Signal Intelligence Directive (USSID) 18 : Page 3, Section 3.4

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE Fort George G. Meade, Maryland 20 October 1980 UNITED STATES SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE DIRECTIVE (USSID) 18 LIMITATIONS AND PROCEDURES IN SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS OF THE USSS (U)

......

3.4 (C xxx) Collection means intentional tasking and/or selection of identified nonpublic communications for subsequent processing aimed at reporting or retention as a file record.

So it would certainly appear that your assertion that, "ALL of the above in entirely incorrect," is incorrect, entirely.

Go here, read it all, and then report to the New York Times that it's all entirely incorrect. Might want to fire off a memo to Clapper and Inglis, too, while yer at it, tell them how incorrect they are, because both have testified in front of Congress to precisely what you say is entire incorrect.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
And I would say that your insight is in direct opposition to not only Clapper's testimony before Congress and his and other's irrefutable actions at the NSA, but also in direct opposition to one of the NSA's founding documents: NSA United States Signal Intelligence Directive (USSID) 18 : Page 3, Section 3.4



So it would certainly appear that your assertion that, "ALL of the above in entirely incorrect," is incorrect, entirely.

Go here, read it all, and then report to the New York Times that it's all entirely incorrect. Might want to fire off a memo to Clapper and Inglis, too, while yer at it, tell them how incorrect they are, because both have testified in front of Congress to precisely what you say is entire incorrect.

What I posted is 100% correct. It was correct when I was an 05H, it was correct when I was a "COT", "COO", "CM". It was correct when Monty was an 05K, it was correct when Wimpy007 was in, I believe he was a TA, could be wrong on that on. It is the EXACT terms being used now at NSA and Army intell where my nephew's wife is an intell officer.

What I posted is how it takes place. Get a hold of Mr. Wiebe, he will tell you the exact same story. I did not read in the Times, The "Rolling Stone" or "Mad" magazine. I did it for 20 years. Next time you are in Taylor, when I am home, drop by, I will show you all of the "proof" I have. BIG DIFFERENCE between reading "stories" and experience.

The USSID you are quoting, and ALL USSID's available for public reading, are not exactly what is actually used or written. You only have access to the unclassified version. There are two versions. The REAL one, that is used, and what you can see online.
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
thing is...no one can believe either side....that is what has come down too....it is like watching a David Copperfield show....the great Illusion....nothing is what it seems.....
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
What I posted is 100% correct. It was correct when I was an 05H, it was correct when I was a "COT", "COO", "CM". It was correct when Monty was an 05K, it was correct when Wimpy007 was in, I believe he was a TA, could be wrong on that on. It is the EXACT terms being used now at NSA and Army intell where my nephew's wife is an intell officer.
So, you're saying that Clapper, Inglis and others with the NSA have lied about all of this in sworn testimony to Congress when they got caught and were presented with classified NSA documents and admitted to precisely what I posted?

What I posted is how it takes place. Get a hold of Mr. Wiebe, he will tell you the exact same story. I did not read in the Times, The "Rolling Stone" or "Mad" magazine. I did it for 20 years. Next time you are in Taylor, when I am home, drop by, I will show you all of the "proof" I have. BIG DIFFERENCE between reading "stories" and experience.
And I should believe you.... beeeecuz you were with the NSA and no one with the NSA ever lies?

NSA, DEA, IRS Lie About Fact That Americans Are Routinely Spied On By Our Government: Time For A Special Prosecutor - Forbes

The USSID you are quoting, and ALL USSID's available for public reading, are not exactly what is actually used or written. You only have access to the unclassified version. There are two versions. The REAL one, that is used, and what you can see online.
You're helping to make my point that the NSA lies and obfuscates the truth, and no one connected with the NSA is to be believed or trusted. The NSA has repeatedly screwed the pooch since 9/11, and they keep getting caught in their lies. Every time it looks like it's just about as bad as it can get, they get caught in something worse. And you're defending all this by saying they aren't doing this crap?

Unbelievable. Literally.

In March the DNI testified under oath in front of the National Intelligence Committee that the NSA does "not wittingly" collect any type of data on millions of Americans. He stuck to that story... right up until the leak of the FISA court order proving that he lied to Congress. Whoops. His response was that his answer was the "least untruthful answer" he could think of. Later, also in front of Congress, also under oath, he admitted that the answer he should have given was simply "yes."

Also under oath in front of Congress he stated unequivocally that the NSA does not collect, gather, store or retain any information or data for which a court order has not expressly ordered them. He had to reverse that one when the NSA's own documents showed the NSA illegally retained 3,032 files that the secret FISA Court had explicitly ordered NSA to destroy. Another "incident" involved something that Clapper said the NSA didn't even have the capability to do, and therefore did not do, was the diversion of international communications traffic passing over through fiber-optic cables in the US into a "repository" for temporary "processing and selection", something the FISA Court in 2011 ruled a violation the Fourth Amendment of the US constitution. He got caught and had to change his tune on that one. His response? It was done unintentionally. You know, something they did not have the capability of doing in the first place. Another incident is where they collected all telephone records into and out of the Washington D.C. Area Code of 202, which was "innocently mistaken" for the International Dialing Code of 20 for the country of Egypt. Clapper and Inglis both said, flat out, that it never happened. When NSA's own documents showed that it did, they said it was an innocent mistake and that the mistake was proptly reported to the FISA Court and to Congress. Except that it was reported to neither, which the same NSA documents showed was a deliberate act of omission. Clapper's response? "Well, it should have been reported." Ya think? Sheesh.

Clapper, Inglis and other officials at the NSA and throughout the intelligence community now have a very impressive record of lying, getting caught, and then having to scramble to come up with lame excuses for all of this. Excuses which, taken as a whole, make the intelligence community look like incompetent, bumbling fools who make innocent mistakes on a daily basis. Since we know these people to be well educated and very smart, it's far more likely that instead of incompetent, bumbling fools, they are calculating, systematic liars operating in a culture of misinformation.

The NSA hides things from Congress when Congressional committee members visit NSA sites, they water down their reports to the Congressional overseers specifically to obfuscate the truth, and they keep on lying to Congress until they get caught and cannot lie about it anymore. Their track record is so impressive that even when they tell the truth they cannot be trusted, about anything, even something they would not lie about, since they've been caught lying about those things, too.

At every turn the NSA has lied and obfuscated. It has dodged, and later been forced to correct the record. Again, and again, and again. Even the latest Washington Post article, which proves beyond deniability that the NSA breaks privacy laws thousands of times a year in a systematic manner. It is something that Clapper, Inglis and others had steadfastly denied they could even do, when later said they could do, but that laws and court orders prevented them from doing these things. When caught, the official response was nothing more than a "yeah, but," we do it, but we catch it when it happens and then correct it. Thousands of times a year, with very specific information. Shyeah, right. Snowden claimed that with just an e-mail address he could read all of the e-mails of an account. "Impossible!" they said. "Can't be done." Congressman Mike Rogers even took to the Congressional floor to mock Snowden. Then, after all the lies had been good and lied, information about the XKeyscore Program came out. Whoops. Confirmed by former NSA Director General Hayden, and later by Clapper and Inglis and others, turns out that it's not only possible, but that they've been doing it for years. But they did it unintentionally. Yeah, but. Yeah, we read e-mails illegally, but we don't have the ability to do that, and even when we do it it's unintentional. Are you kidding me?

And you're going to sit there and tell us that not only are the declassified NSA documents lies, but so are the leaked classified NSA documents and the leaked classified FISA court orders, and that Clapper wasn't lying, even when he got caught lying and admitted that he was lying? Seriously? You're really going to do that?

Let me ask you the very same question that Clapper and others at the NSA have been asked. Does the NSA collect data on thousands or millions of Americans?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
You read, I did. End of story. Nice try. Experience is REAL. Stories are fiction. Then end. Eat my dust. You lose.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
You read, I did. End of story. Nice try. Experience is REAL. Stories are fiction. Then end. Eat my dust. You lose.

It's a simple question. Why won't you answer it?

Experience may be real, and stories may be fiction, but so far everyone connected with the NSA has been proven to be a liar. And I'm supposed to eat your dust on this issue?
 
Top