Maybe we should be more specific? Like whether you are talking handgun or rifle....
No guns in England, but
- Thread starter skyraider
- Start date
You mean like in the 102 nations around the world that have a higher murder rate per capita than the U.S., the majority of which also ban guns? Who would ever imagine.
I don't know why you think it's sneaky. It's a fairly plain and straightforward statement. Yes, it's meant for people who were murdered in a "Kitchen". That's why I used the phrase "in the kitchen". I used that phrase specifically so as not to confuse someone.This is meant for people who were murdered in a "Kitchen"..........Right??
Trying to be sneaky there..........aint 'cha.
Here's one that will really mess you up. Most people who are murdered on a golf course are murdered with a golf club.
It was also used to illustrate that people will kill using the most readily available weapon. If guns are not readily available, people will use something else. And that's the fallacy, where people think if you eliminate guns you'll eliminate all those murders. But eliminating guns, or kitchen knives from the kitchen, won't eliminate murder. They'll use a cast iron skillet or something, whatever is handy.
I wonder how Cain killed Able? No guns were around back then that I know of.
Who should be more specific?
Well I see statements like guns are illegal in Canada.... Which is not true...
As far as I understand, handguns are or are at least greatly restricted. There was, at one time, a BIG push to outlaw semi auto's of any type, including shot guns.
I really don't care what they do in Canada, none of my business. Not my country. I would never move there. FAR to restrictive on the things I like to do.
Hand guns are almost a no no...but one could be proved deathly wrong that a crook could walk into any Canadian home and not get shot! LOL
Last edited by a moderator:
When a crook breaks into a home he/she/it SHOULD face getting shot! NO person has a RIGHT to break into a home to steal or do harm to it's owners.