More nonsense from the dumocratic party

Poorboy · Apr 7, 2012

www.godfatherpolitics.com reports that the dumocratic party has threatened to Boycott Coke and Walmart because they support an organization that wants picture IDs to vote.The Dumocrats are trying to make the picture ID to vote a racial one

Go to the website, scroll down to bottom and click on#-2 the 2nd. line will show and then scroll down to the article....

RLENT · Apr 7, 2012

Poorboy said:
The Dumocrats are trying to make the picture ID to vote a racial one

Does that mean everyone will have to be photographed in "blackface" ? (or "whiteface" as appropriate)

Any update or new news on that "Obama-is-guilty-of-treason" (to Israel apparently ....

) thingie ?

Poorboy · Apr 7, 2012

RLENT said:
Does that mean everyone will have to be photographed in "blackface" ? (or "whiteface" as appropriate)

Any update or new news on that "Obama-is-guilty-of-treason" (to Israel apparently .... ) thingie ?

I just posted a link for people to read is all, did ya read it? If ya did then only you can answer your own question because i don't know

No update that I know of.

skyraider · Apr 7, 2012

I dont see any reason why we need picture Id's, the rear ends of donkeys are everywhere. On a more serious note, just finger print everyone, u go to vote, ur fingerprint goes thru the system, and walahh, u can vote or not, or u may be arrested on the spot, works for me...........Happy
Easter everyone......................

Ragman · Apr 7, 2012

skyraider said:
I dont see any reason why we need picture Id's, the rear ends of donkeys are everywhere. On a more serious note, just finger print everyone, u go to vote, ur fingerprint goes thru the system, and walahh, u can vote or not, or u may be arrested on the spot, works for me...........Happy
Easter everyone......................

While I have no problem with requiring photo I.D., I will draw the line on finger prints.

zorry · Apr 7, 2012

Now that's serious when Ragman says " I draw the line...."

Ragman · Apr 7, 2012

zorry said:
Now that's serious when Ragman says " I draw the line...."

I can not and will not support any finger printing requirement to be able to vote.

LDB · Apr 7, 2012

You shouldn't need to be fingerprinted to vote. Now to get the photo ID (driver's license allowing you the privilege to drive) you should be fingerprinted so each ID has a unique fingerprint and the ID can't be stolen since the proper fingerprint can't be associated with it. Then when it's time to vote you just show the driver's license.

Tennesseahawk · Apr 8, 2012

LDB said:
You shouldn't need to be fingerprinted to vote. Now to get the photo ID (driver's license allowing you the privilege to drive) you should be fingerprinted so each ID has a unique fingerprint and the ID can't be stolen since the proper fingerprint can't be associated with it. Then when it's time to vote you just show the driver's license.

Right to drive.

Tennesseahawk · Apr 8, 2012

Do I think everyone should have one form of ID or another? Yes.

Do I think it is up to the individual to decide if they want to be stoopid and not have one? Yes.

Do I think the government should force one to have ID in order to vote? Hell no!

cableguymn · Apr 8, 2012

Ok.. how bout this.. No ID, No finger print. When you get your ballot you dip your finger in purple dye.

Have dye on your finger? no more ballots for you!

This won't stop illegals from voting. But it will be a small step in the right direction. Socialism did not happen over night. It crept up on is one small step at a time. Its going to take small steps away from it to correct it.

RLENT · Apr 8, 2012

cableguymn said:
Ok.. how bout this.. No ID, No finger print. When you get your ballot you dip your finger in purple dye.

Have dye on your finger? no more ballots for you!

That's a good idea .... solves the dead people/multiple vote aspect
.

cableguymn said:
This won't stop illegals from voting.

Best way to stop illegals from voting: secure the **** border .....

layoutshooter · Apr 8, 2012

"Best way to stop illegals from voting: secure the **** border ....."

Never happen. Obama needs as many illegals voting as he can get. They are part of his reelection plans.

Never happen. The GOP needs as many illegals as they can for cheap labor.

Neither party is interested in securing our borders.

RLENT · Apr 8, 2012

layoutshooter said:
Never happen. Obama needs as many illegals voting as he can get. They are part of his reelection plans.

Never happen. The GOP needs as many illegals as they can for cheap labor.

Neither party is interested in securing our borders.

Heheheh .... clearly, neither of them are interested in doing what is the best interests of the citizens or the nation as a whole ....

So why in the hell do we support either one ?

A pox on both their houses .....

layoutshooter · Apr 8, 2012

RLENT said:
[/COLOR]
[/COLOR]Heheheh .... clearly, neither of them are interested in doing what is the best interests of the citizens or the nation as a whole ....

So why in the hell do we support either one ?

A pox on both their houses .....

We support one or the other because, for a least for now, we have no real third choice. The best thing we could do is get a "none of the above" choice on this years ballot. No write in can win.

RLENT · Apr 8, 2012

layoutshooter said:
We support one or the other because, for a least for now, we have no real third choice.

Yeah, I see what you're saying .... but it doesn't exactly hit the point I'm trying to make which is that premise of supporting a party - any party - is itself counterproductive and is sort of a socialist/collectivist paradigm ....

In all cases, elections to office are of individuals .... support the individual .... screw the party ....

layoutshooter said:
The best thing we could do is get a "none of the above" choice on this years ballot.

I'd say the best thing would be to get NOA on the ballot permanently ... for all future ballots ...

It serves a valid purpose of letting the PTB know that we ain't happy campers ....

layoutshooter said:
No write in can win.

That may well be ...... however:

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." - John Quincy Adams

layoutshooter · Apr 8, 2012

A write in cannot work this November or any November. I would write in who I believe is the best person for the job based on my beliefs and life experience. You would do the same. Since my beliefs and experience are vastly different, it is likely that my 'ideal' candidate would be different. For me to vote for your ideal candidate would be no different than me voting for Romney. Either way, I would be settling. It would be the same for you and my 'ideal' candidate.