chefdennis
Veteran Expediter
Greg wrote:
They should have been let to go BK....
Panel: GM stock sale may trim taxpayer recovery
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110113/ap_on_bi_ge/us_automakers_bailout_watchdog
Now back to the original topic.....
The need to institute a right to work attitude would do great for those auto companies who have yet to recover or are lying about their recovery.
They should have been let to go BK....
Panel: GM stock sale may trim taxpayer recovery
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110113/ap_on_bi_ge/us_automakers_bailout_watchdog
.By MARCY GORDON, AP Business Writer Marcy Gordon, Ap Business Writer – Thu Jan 13, 8:21 am ET
WASHINGTON – By selling a block of its shares in General Motors Co. for $33 each — a price far below the "break-even" point — the government sharply reduced the chances of taxpayers fully recovering their $50 billion investment in the auto giant, a new report from a congressional watchdog says.
The Treasury Department did gain a "major recovery" of taxpayer aid, $13.5 billion, by selling a chunk of its GM stock in November, the Congressional Oversight Panel said in a report issued Thursday. And the $85 billion bailout of GM, Chrysler and auto lender GMAC — now known as Ally Financial — seems to have put them "on the path to financial stability," the report said.
But the companies still face uncertain futures, taxpayers remain at risk and there are concerns about the government's openness in the unprecedented rescue program, the report said.
Without the rescue from the Bush and Obama administrations starting in December 2008, GM, Chrysler and GMAC would have faced the financial abyss, the report said. Their failure would have been crushing blow on the economy.
The Obama administration has said the rescue was needed to prevent the loss of at least a million jobs and economic devastation in the industrial Midwest. Administration officials have said they never expected to recoup the full investment.
An earlier estimate by the Congressional Budget Office that taxpayers would lose $40 billion on the auto industry rescue has been slashed to $19 billion, the oversight panel noted.
GM was pushed into bankruptcy protection by the Obama administration. It emerged in 2009 with a balance sheet cleansed of its staggering debt. The company has made an impressive turnaround from losing billions before its restructuring to posting $4.2 billion in profits in the first nine months of last year.
Still, the report said, by selling 45 percent of its GM shares for $33 each in the automaker's $15.8 billion initial public offering in November, Treasury "locked in" a loss of billions of dollars and diminished the likelihood of full repayment to taxpayers. The "break-even" price needed for that is $44.59 a share, according to the report.
Government officials say that GM's stock price averaged only 3 percent above $33 in the month following the IPO, confirming that it was fairly priced.
"These are always tough decisions," Sen. Ted Kaufman, D-Del., the panel's chairman, said in a conference call with reporters on Wednesday. Treasury's decisions "may well have been reasonable" but the rescue program's objectives should have been more clearly defined, he said.
GM's stock price has been rising as the company has performed better than many expected. It closed Wednesday at $38.62. If the trend continues, it's possible that taxpayers could be made whole.
The new report also:
_said the prospects for taxpayer recovery from Chrysler are reduced because the government owns only 10 percent of the company's stock and so has limited influence on the timing of an initial public offering.
_criticized what it called Treasury's "hands off" approach toward Ally Financial, not always asserting its influence of the timing of an eventual IPO. The department also declined to block GM's purchase of AmeriCredit, even though that finance firm may end up competing against Ally Financial, it said.
_said that the government's aid to prevent GM and Chrysler from failing "has put more competently managed automotive companies at a disadvantage," referring to Ford Motor Co
Now back to the original topic.....