Let teens have sex

LDB · Mar 23, 2012

Why limit it to teens, let the preteens go at it too. Planned Parenthood, bringing and encouraging abortion for the masses.

Planned Parenthood speaker: Good parents let teens have sex at home | LifeSiteNews.com

asjssl · Mar 23, 2012

Well ...if we (Americans) were not so uptight about sex...probably wouldn't be such a big deal...you only want to do what your told not to do....and what do you mean by "abortions for the masses" ?? Let's just keep having all these unwanted children...there's a good idea..

Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums

cableguymn · Mar 24, 2012

asjssl said:
Well ...if we (Americans) were not so uptight about sex...probably wouldn't be such a big deal...you only want to do what your told not to do....and what do you mean by "abortions for the masses" ?? Let's just keep having all these unwanted children...there's a good idea..

Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums

haven't seen the waiting list for adoptions have ya? Those kids are wanted. maybe not by the person aborting them (I can't call them mothers.. sorry. They are not even close to earning that title if they want to abort the child) but someone does.

Before you go off on me.. we are on the waiting list. have been for 3 years now. I am adopted. My sister is adopted and so are both of my parents.

It works. I am living proof of it.

Dynamite 1 · Mar 24, 2012

is the waiting list not more caused by red tape than the actual lack of children wanting to be adopted. i have family in the field, and the red tape to me seems to be a huge hold up. dont get me wrong, not every person that wants to adopt should be let do so, but there is a large amount of children in the waiting. i just cant climb on board with more unwanted being put on the list. take the unwanted with a grain, cause they are all wanted by someone, but the lack of the system to place them in an appropriate amount of time is burdensome on the system itself and creates a less than, shall we say, accommodating life for those children. especially the ones who get shifted from foster home to foster home. childrens home life cant be that great either.
but we are on the bad list cause we are pro choice, to a point. just not the extreme point.

paullud · Mar 24, 2012

cableguymn said:
haven't seen the waiting list for adoptions have ya? Those kids are wanted. maybe not by the person aborting them (I can't call them mothers.. sorry. They are not even close to earning that title if they want to abort the child) but someone does.

Before you go off on me.. we are on the waiting list. have been for 3 years now. I am adopted. My sister is adopted and so are both of my parents.

It works. I am living proof of it.

My wife and I are 31 and 26, we are thinking about waiting 5-10 years and adopting when we are more prepared financially to have a family. I want kids that are old enough that I won't have to change diapers though.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

mxzane933 · Mar 24, 2012

paullud said:
My wife and I are 31 and 26, we are thinking about waiting 5-10 years and adopting when we are more prepared financially to have a family. I want kids that are old enough that I won't have to change diapers though.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

Diapers nooooo can do lol

Sent from my DROID BIONIC using EO Forums

Pilgrim · Mar 24, 2012

LDB said:
Why limit it to teens, let the preteens go at it too. Planned Parenthood, bringing and encouraging abortion for the masses.

Planned Parenthood speaker: Good parents let teens have sex at home | LifeSiteNews.com

It all relates to sex education, which needs to happen in the home and be conducted by the parents - not the public school system. With our two girls, my wife and I did our best to get them to understand that if they were going to have sex in their teen years they better be prepared to drop out of school, forget their social lives and dedicate themselves to raising a baby if they got pregnant. Abortion wasn't discussed since we wanted them to understand the possible consequencs of their actions. We also made it clear we had an open door policy regarding sex talk or anything else for that matter. During their high school years we found that there was an unbelievable amount of confusion and misinformation about sex that was circulating among their peers. Most of these girls didn't have a clue about pregnancy and what causes it, and knew even less about STDs, how they're transmitted and the lifelong consequences that can result with some of them. I believe the thing that made the most significant impression on them was the article and pictures of genital herpes - they didn't want any part of that!

Regarding the sexual activities of the Dutch - it's unlikely that we'll see anything like that anytime soon in the US and I certainly don't agree with it. But looking at the following study comparing the US and Netherlands, it's hard to argue with their results.

Consequences of U.S. and Dutch Approaches to Teen Sex » Sociological Images

Tennesseahawk · Mar 24, 2012

paullud said:
My wife and I are 31 and 26, we are thinking about waiting 5-10 years and adopting when we are more prepared financially to have a family. I want kids that are old enough that I won't have to change diapers though.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

If you're that squeamish about the sight of baby poop, I'd hate to see you bereft of manliness when your kid gashes his/her leg open, or steps on a nail, or something like that.

paullud · Mar 24, 2012

Tennesseahawk said:
If you're that squeamish about the sight of baby poop, I'd hate to see you bereft of manliness when your kid gashes his/her leg open, or steps on a nail, or something like that.

I can handle wounds without an issue just not diapers.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

Tennesseahawk · Mar 24, 2012

You'll be missing out then. Changing of the pants is a big bonding thing for fathers.

paullud · Mar 24, 2012

I'm sure I will figure out something else to bond over.

Sent from my ADR6400L using EO Forums

gospelriders · Mar 25, 2012

Pilgrim said:
It all relates to sex education, which needs to happen in the home and be conducted by the parents - not the public school system. With our two girls, my wife and I did our best to get them to understand that if they were going to have sex in their teen years they better be prepared to drop out of school, forget their social lives and dedicate themselves to raising a baby if they got pregnant. Abortion wasn't discussed since we wanted them to understand the possible consequencs of their actions. We also made it clear we had an open door policy regarding sex talk or anything else for that matter. During their high school years we found that there was an unbelievable amount of confusion and misinformation about sex that was circulating among their peers. Most of these girls didn't have a clue about pregnancy and what causes it, and knew even less about STDs, how they're transmitted and the lifelong consequences that can result with some of them. I believe the thing that made the most significant impression on them was the article and pictures of genital herpes - they didn't want any part of that!

Regarding the sexual activities of the Dutch - it's unlikely that we'll see anything like that anytime soon in the US and I certainly don't agree with it. But looking at the following study comparing the US and Netherlands, it's hard to argue with their results.

Consequences of U.S. and Dutch Approaches to Teen Sex » Sociological Images

our daughter took a different and rare approach these days. she decided to honor God and herself by waiting for marriage.she did not want to give up some thing so important to somebody that was not committed to her for more than just sex. she is 21 now and still committed to that principle.it is rare but, there are young people who have made this same deal. strangely and sadly a lot of her christian friends didn't understand why she was doing this.