John Edwards indicted

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
John Edwards charged in felony indictment
The Associated Press
RALEIGH, N.C. — A federal grand jury has indicted two-time presidential candidate John Edwards over massive sums of money spent to keep his mistress in hiding during the peak of his 2008 campaign for the White House.

The case of USA v. Johnny Reid Edwards contains six counts, including conspiracy, four counts of illegal campaign contributions and one count of false statements. The indictment was returned in the Middle District of North Carolina Friday.

An Edwards spokeswoman said she wasn't aware of the filing and declined immediate comment.

The indictment is the culmination of a federal investigation that lasted more than two years and scoured through virtually every corner of Edwards' political career.

Federal officials have approved criminal charges, deciding that the hundreds of thousands of dollars two Edwards donors gave to help keep his mistress in hiding were contributions that should have been reported publicly by his campaign fund because they aided his bid for the Democratic White House nomination.

Edwards' lawyers have argued that the funds were gifts from friends intended to keep the affair a secret from his wife, Elizabeth, who died of cancer in December.

Law licence?
A plea to a felony charge involving campaign finances could strip Edwards of his law license and end any hope he could work as an attorney for the poor. And a trial would mean more sordid stories about his campaign affair and the child he fathered during it, further battering his reputation.

Even if he were to win the case, it appears the 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee would do so by making a humiliating argument: that money used to keep his mistress and out-of-wedlock child in hiding was intended to shield the affair from his cancer-stricken wife — not to aid his candidacy, which is what prosecutors believe.

"Trial or not, John Edwards is the Charlie Sheen of American politics — great hair and no chance for rehabilitation," Democratic consultant Jack Quinn said.

Political sex scandals can either be just a career glitch (think Newt Gingrich, who recently announced a run for the presidency) or a career-ender (think Mark Foley, who recently declined a run for mayor of West Palm Beach, Fla.). Many Democrats believe Edwards falls into the latter category, as someone who faces little chance of revitalizing his image even if he emerges victorious from his legal case.

Edwards' attorneys have denounced the investigation as a waste of resources and contend he did not violate the law.

Edwards has said he hopes that once this case is behind him he can revive his legal career, specializing in helping the victims of poverty he championed on the campaign trail. However, a lawyer in North Carolina who pleads guilty or no contest to a criminal offense faces disciplinary action by the State Bar, ranging from a mild rebuke to a loss of license to practice.

The case against Edwards focused on the private money used to keep Edwards' mistress in hiding. Andrew Young, a former aide to Edwards, initially claimed paternity of mistress Rielle Hunter's child and traveled around the country keeping her in seclusion. Young has said he received hundreds of thousands of dollars of support from two wealthy Edwards donors.

Another dent in an Edwards' revival is moving ahead in civil court, where Young and Hunter are battling over a purported sex tape involving the former candidate. Edwards has been deposed as part of that lawsuit.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
:eek: What a surprise! :rolleyes: Who would have ever thought John Edwards was a dishonest sleazebag? :rolleyes: Who would have ever imagined Edwards breaking laws and rules? :rolleyes: I'm sure there are plenty of koolaid drinkers out there who will swear he's almost as pure and good as Obama though.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Good, I hope he is found guilty and has to pay. He used his wife's sickness to further his political career at the same time screwing around on the side. I have zero sympathy for him or his family at this point because of his profession - trail lawyer and what he has done.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
Good, I hope he is found guilty and has to pay. He used his wife's sickness to further his political career at the same time screwing around on the side. I have zero sympathy for him or his family at this point because of his profession - trail lawyer and what he has done.

His family?? His three children who are just victims in this, two of which are underage?? No sympathy for them??
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
Reminds me of King David and Ms Besheba and the bathtub story and u know how that went. Boom boom will do it everytime:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Just another in a VERY LONG line of Dumb-O-Crat scum. Fits right in with "Uncle Teddy" and "Slick Willy". NO character what so ever.

Not to worry the "women's rights groups" will back him again if he ever gets a chance to run. It matters not what he DOES as long as he backs the "baby killing". What a bunch they are!
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
His family?? His three children who are just victims in this, two of which are underage?? No sympathy for them??

Nope I don't agree, they are not victims unless they become homeless and penniless which will never happen. They benefited from his and his wife's "success" and sympathy is lost on them. I feel sorry for those who lost a parent because of a sickness and don't have the staff of people who took care of them or the trust fund to fall back on. They will come out of this with college paid for and their lives without the heartache others experience in the same situation. He should have considered his family before he dipped his wick.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Nope I don't agree, they are not victims unless they become homeless and penniless which will never happen. They benefited from his and his wife's "success" and sympathy is lost on them. I feel sorry for those who lost a parent because of a sickness and don't have the staff of people who took care of them or the trust fund to fall back on. They will come out of this with college paid for and their lives without the heartache others experience in the same situation. He should have considered his family before he dipped his wick.

Don't agree, there is far more important things in life than college tuition and trust funds. Those are WAY down the list.

Having parents set a good example for the children they have it FAR more important. It is the lack of example and character that has lead to the idea that anything is OKEE DOKEE. Divorce takes a toll, there are no free rides.

This scum bag, a FINE example of leadership, honesty and integrity.
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
Nope I don't agree, they are not victims unless they become homeless and penniless which will never happen. They benefited from his and his wife's "success" and sympathy is lost on them. I feel sorry for those who lost a parent because of a sickness and don't have the staff of people who took care of them or the trust fund to fall back on. They will come out of this with college paid for and their lives without the heartache others experience in the same situation. He should have considered his family before he dipped his wick.

You pretty much sound like you resent these children because of the lives they've been given. A little class warfare going on in your head?? The loss of their Mother and now the public humiliation that their Father has brought to them, you think that has no bearing on their so-called privileged lives?? Come on Greg.....:rolleyes:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Don't agree, there is far more important things in life than college tuition and trust funds. Those are WAY down the list.

So you don't agree that we should actually have sympathy for those who can afford the staff and have the trust fund instead of those who have and will have to face life without the money?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
So you don't agree that we should actually have sympathy for those who can afford the staff and have the trust fund instead of those who have and will have to face life without the money?


I think ANY child, no matter what monetary means that they may have are likely to be damaged in one way or another by the examples these kids set before them.

Money is only a tool. Lack of it can and is often overcome. Lack of character is seldom overcome and I pity the kids who have a parent or parents who find it unimportant to set a proper example for their offspring.

A poor kid from a good, solid family, has a much greater chance of living a productive, useful life than a rich kid raised by a parent or parents who are scum
 

dieseldiva

Veteran Expediter
So you don't agree that we should actually have sympathy for those who can afford the staff and have the trust fund instead of those who have and will have to face life without the money?

There was no choice of who to feel sorry for in this thread, there are no children here that have to "face life without the money". We're talking about John Edwards and his children. Why do you ALWAYS have to make these threads about someone else that YOU think deserves whatever we happen to be talking about at the time? You act as though none of us feel sorry for whatever opposite you present......some of us happen to feel sorry for BOTH.....sheesh, I can walk and chew gum at the same time!
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
.sheesh, I can walk and chew gum at the same time!

Geez, every time I ever tried that I fell and hit my head!! :eek:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
There was no choice of who to feel sorry for in this thread, there are no children here that have to "face life without the money". We're talking about John Edwards and his children.

Well as I said, I have no sympathy for people like that, including their children. It comes from growing up with people like them who are elitist in both attitude and arrogance. I just can't feel sorry for them, no matter how I try to and to think I'm criticize for my feelings when I wasn't the one who put my family in danger. I make the comparison because they will be treated better and have better opportunities due to their status among the crowd Edwards and others like him were part of. If you want to feel sorry for them, go ahead.

Why do you ALWAYS have to make these threads about someone else that YOU think deserves whatever we happen to be talking about at the time? You act as though none of us feel sorry for whatever opposite you present......some of us happen to feel sorry for BOTH.....sheesh, I can walk and chew gum at the same time!

I don't know, you tell me so we both know.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Children 13 and especially 11 are likely to suffer from the sins of the father while sharing no responsibility for them. While one may have their own personal reasons for their feelings I suspect most people would feel badly for children, especially a preteen, after losing their mother to cancer and having a criminal bum for a father, at least until such time as they overtly demonstrate reason not to.
 
Top