Jews in Great Britain, not safe
- Thread starter skyraider
- Start date
For 2016, we need a nominee who calls things as they are. Stop sanitizing the atrocities committed by ISIS. Stop downplaying the threat. War is coming because ISIS and like-minded terrorist groups won't allow the world to live in peace. Europe is in real trouble. The United States faces real threats. We need a plain-speaking nominee who understands national security, whose allegiance and devotion to the United States is unquestioned. We need someone who understands an enemy like ISIS must be destroyed utterly. We wouldn't be in this mess if we had finished the job during Gulf War I and II. We stopped short of finishing the war.
Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana understands the threat we face. Gov. Rick Perry gets it. Ted Cruz gets it. The next time we turn on television and awaken to news of a horrific mass casualty attack on the US, let's hope an overwhelming response comes quickly from a real war-time president. The times we live in call for tough, unforgiving leadership.
Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana understands the threat we face. Gov. Rick Perry gets it. Ted Cruz gets it. The next time we turn on television and awaken to news of a horrific mass casualty attack on the US, let's hope an overwhelming response comes quickly from a real war-time president. The times we live in call for tough, unforgiving leadership.
Just more bought and paid for stooges.
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
We have walking among us various anatomically-challenged idjits who have suggested as much ...
They seem to have a few other targets in their sights as well.
In response the Egyptians, like the Jordanians strike back at the ISIS terrorists rather than dither an wring their hands like our do-nothing POTUS who is more concerned with his golf handicap and lifting insignificant sanctions on the Iranians - the world's largest state sponsor of jihad and terrorism.
Maybe this is the vision of Barack Hussein Obama's international "fundamental change", placing the USA on the sidelines while the countries like Jordan, Egypt, France and Denmark depend on the hive of scum and villainy at the UN to take the lead against muslim barbarians that are hellbent on taking world civilization back to the 10th century.
Considering that there are moderate Islamic states like Jordan and Egypt that are willing to take the fight to the ISIS vermin, the least the US could do is provide immediate aid these existing long-time allies with massive military aid of technology, lethal weapons, ammunition and supplies. A few advisors would help also, if we're not willing to send troops. However, not doing that just delays the inevitable.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Dude, seriously. Turn off the hate radio and the opinion blowhards on FoxNews. If you seriously think the U.S. is on the sidelines you are delusional. Plus, those countries listed are very capable of defending themselves against ISIS along with U.S./UN military aid and intelligence.
Good, about friggen' time. Too bad it's taken ISIS to murder some of their own to get off the hands and finally do something. We should be on the sidelines cheering them on waving our big foamy #1 finger and jumping in if the benches decide to clear.
Like I said above, turn off the hate radio and the opinion people on FoxNews and get a clue.
We provide the bulk of the military aid in the fight against ISIS. That's with 60 other Nations providing military aid. 60! And we are still the bulk supplier of military aid.
http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/06/world/meast/isis-coalition-nations/index.html
Talk about a troll.
Last edited:
RLENT
Veteran Expediter
Hilarious witness ...
Yup ... it's pretty easy to see how the idiocy down in Konservative Kookville - which includes hate-radio and the opinion idjits @ Faux News - are effecting the proper functioning of the mental thought processes of some ...
Good call ...
Yup ... it's pretty easy to see how the idiocy down in Konservative Kookville - which includes hate-radio and the opinion idjits @ Faux News - are effecting the proper functioning of the mental thought processes of some ...
Good call ...
Last edited:
Ok. Lets hear from the brilliant minds. Exactly, what would your solution be? Only your solution.
Lets hope it isn't to create jobs like our state department.
Couldn't even sell Chris Matthews on this stupidity. Yep, lets send people over to create jobs. That's it. Of course they might get burnt alive or beheaded, but this will "defeat & degrade ISIS".
Rep. Peter King Shocked At Claim That Jobs Program Can Stop ISIS « CBS New York
Just amazing how clueless some can be.
Lets hope it isn't to create jobs like our state department.
Couldn't even sell Chris Matthews on this stupidity. Yep, lets send people over to create jobs. That's it. Of course they might get burnt alive or beheaded, but this will "defeat & degrade ISIS".
Rep. Peter King Shocked At Claim That Jobs Program Can Stop ISIS « CBS New York
Just amazing how clueless some can be.
There are those of us that find repugnant these ISIS videos of people being burned to death or beheaded, along with the other mass killings they commit in their quest to conquer considerable geographical area in the Middle East, including Iraq which was abandoned by the our inept POTUS in his rush to the exits. Your implication is that we're to be labeled as "haters"?? Now that's pretty dam funny, especially from somebody that obviously doesn't know WTF he's talking about. Does watching that Jordanian pilot being burned alive send a chill up your leg? Next week we could be watching the same thing happen to a US citizen, maybe the son or daughter of one of your neighbors. The fact is, this half-baked air campaign against ISIS has been mostly ineffective considering the growth in the areas they've conquered over the past 18 months.
"By contrast, over the past two months U.S. aircraft and a small number of partner forces have conducted 412 total strikes in Iraq and Syria—an average of seven strikes a day. With Islamic State in control of an area approaching 50,000 square miles, it is easy to see why this level of effort has not had much impact on its operations.
Of course, air operations during Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom were each supported by a massive coalition force on the ground. Thus it may be more appropriate to compare current operations against Islamic State with the 78-day air campaign against Serbian forces and their proxies in 1999, or the 75-day air campaign in Afghanistan that was instrumental in forcing the Taliban out of power in 2001.
Both campaigns relied heavily on partner forces on the ground augmented by a small but significant number of U.S. troops. These air campaigns averaged 138 and 86 strike sorties a day respectively—orders of magnitude greater than the current tempo of operations against Islamic State."
Mark Gunzinger and John Stillion: The Unserious Air War Against ISIS - WSJ
That's a crafty way to dodge the profanity filters in the website software; at least try to keep the discourse on a moderate level of decency. Considering the source, I realize that's asking a lot. BTW, the outcry after 911 was to go after the Taliban and Al-quaeda terrorists hiding in Afghanistan who harbored and trained the muslim slime that killed 3000 American civilians on our own soil. Maybe the "idiots" and "haters" were justified in demanding revenge in this instance.
Maybe the "haters" also realize the largesse of our naive and arrogant POTUS - who obviously demonstrates a preference for Iran and other muslim troublemakers over the interests of our traditional allies - could lead to yet another terrorist attack on our homeland larger in scale than that of 911.
War with Isis: The West is wrong again in its fight against terror - Comment - Voices - The Independent
Profanity, the crutch of the simple minded and/or those with nothing worthwhile to contribute.
WTF do you think WTF means?