It's Like a Flux Capacitor!

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
The US Navy's new railgun has debuted at the Navy’s Future Force Science and Technology Expo at the Washington Convention Center this week, and it's gnarly as far as big guns go.

Conventional weapons like a Hellfire missile can travel little over Mach 1 and a 5-inch gun hit targets up to 13 miles away, the railgun can strike targets 110 miles away at Mach 7, and it can reach Mach 7 in about 10 milliseconds. Its projectile has the impact at 110 miles away of a freight train crashing through a wall at 100 MPH.

It's all very neat, keen, supercool and groovy. It's all very Star Wars (the movie) with apparently a little Back to the Future thrown in. Understandably, the science nerds behind this are excited, as we see from the first man speaking, Roger Ellis the program's officer, showing us his excitement in his reserved, nerdy manner. But the Reuters video is still mainly a straightforward, informative news video about the railgun. Until the 1:03 minute mark, that is, when we heard from Rear Admiral Mathias Winter, Chief of Naval Research, as he does his best little-too-excited, wild-eyed Doc Brown impression talking about the Flux Capacitor. I was waiting for him to tell us how it generates 1.21 gigawatts of electricity. but he didn't have to. It's funny enough without it.

I can't stop laughing. He's leaning in closer and closer telling you "It's like a Flux Capacitor, right!" "We've got scientists, who have designed these, and it's coming to life!" <really wide eyes> OMG LOL

 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
They have been working on developing the "rail gun" for a very long time. The idea is a good one, and the day will come when it is operational.

It is not out of the norm for "traditionalists" to "poo poo" advancement that may be beyond their capability to understand.

There was once a time when there were those that opposed the idea of rifles replacing the musket.
 
Last edited:

tknight

Veteran Expediter
I know I wouldn't be too happy being on the receiving end of poo-poo at Mach 7 , that's for sure!!!!!
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Just to clarify, this thread is about the railgun, sure, but more than that it's mostly about this guy, a Rear Admiral, and how he talks about it. He's very intense when he talks about flux capacitors. :D

Flux_zpssvjlpitr.png
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Who poo poo'd it?

Many have. I was not saying that anyone here was fool enough to think that this was not possible.

It's like many military commanders, at the outset of WWII, who believed that the airplane was not going to play a real role and that the "battleship" would define the naval war.

One thing about history, when the majority don't study it, we are doomed to repeat it.

The "Flux Capacitor" is yet a "dream". The "Rail Gun" will happen, much sooner than later.

It is too bad that we humans need conflict to advance science.

The offshoots of the "Flux Capacitor" could go a long way to solving our energy problems. Imagine, each home producing 100% of it's energy needs, shielded from things like, EMP, safe from most of nature and politicians.
 
Last edited:

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Humans don't "need conflict to advance science"! Intellectual curiosity is inherent in most humans, to some degree: we want to know the answers, and that advances science.
 

Moot

Veteran Expediter
Owner/Operator
Humans don't "need conflict to advance science"! Intellectual curiosity is inherent in most humans, to some degree: we want to know the answers, and that advances science.
True, but a conflict and a huge military budget doesn't hurt.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Very few people work to "advance science" and few ever even look for the answers.

Far too many today are content to just "take things as they are". Too many no longer wonder, muse or question. Shoot, people are not even willing to learn simple, basic, facts when faced with them.
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
True, but a conflict and a huge military budget doesn't hurt.

In many ways, it does: without the huge military budget, we might be forced to get creative about resolving conflict without killing people.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
In many ways, it does: without the huge military budget, we might be forced to get creative about resolving conflict without killing people.
Creative conflict resolutions without killing people are mostly diplomatic solutions, not drivers of scientific advancements.
 
Top