I know if I were sitting waiting for a load, and the truck next to me had less dwell time, but was wanting to get home, I wouldn't feel it unfair if they were offered a load towards home. I doubt it would happen very often, and FedEx could put a limit of, say, one request per month, or something similar.
I would consider it very unfair if events developed as you describe above. Let me cite a real-world example.
Diane and I were once in Phoenix at the Flying J with a bunch of other expediters. One team we knew well. They were from Florida and dearly wanted to get home for a reason they felt was important, I don't recall the reason.
Not being a fan of truck stops and believing it wise to sit closer to the zip codes where we have picked up freight before, we moved across town to wait there. It also put us closer to Tuscon than the other trucks and we reasoned that would give us an edge.
We were still driving across town when an immediate pick up load popped up in Chandler, where we happened to be at that moment. It was a high paying load going to Florida and because of our dwell time, qualifications, location, etc. the load was dispatched to us. This was under the old dispatch system where loads were offered to one truck at a time. Other trucks would not have seen the offer unless we declined the load.
Now. lets modify the circumstances a bit to say we got to our parking place across town and the other team would have had time to get to the pick up to snag that load to Florida. Say we had more dwell time but because the other team wanted to go home, they would be able to trump our dwell time and take the load.
This was a lucarative load. We are out here to make money. I would be very upset if we lost the load to another team's personal desires. Even if it only happened once a year, I would not be pleased to hand $4,000 of gross revenue over to another truck simply because that truck wanted to go home.
Such a system could open a can of worms. I could see it happen that Diane and I might have just been home in Minnesota for two weeks, that we got there on our own nickel, and now finding ourselves in California and trucks piling up, we use the home bump to snatch a load out from under other trucks because the load happens to be going to or toward Minnesota. We would use the system to get home but the real reason would be to get running again. Would that be fair to the other trucks that had more dwell time than us?
Diane just offered another example. Say you and another solo driver are in California. He has been there three weeks and wants to get back East. You normally avoid California loads because you know you can get stuck out there, but took one to CA because it paid oh so very well. If a load pops up going to Ohio where you live, who should get the load; the guy with three weeks of time on the West Coast or you who just arrived? How would he feel if he saw you snatch the load by using your home bump?
I have heard that Panther's program for getting trucks home is better than FedEx's. But notice the significant feature. It is a program where you find your own freight to get home and the carrier helps you book it. You do not go home under the freight on the Panther board. If you want a special trip home, you find your own freight and use the carrier's assistance to get it on your truck, get paid for hauling it, etc.
Diane and I get home as often as we wish by planning ahead and deadheading if we must. We do not expect help from our carrier and would not want to see a get-home program put in place that would take money out of our pockets by giving it to others who want to get home.
Newbies take note:
FedEx Custom Critical, an expedite carrier, has never been a company that has been much help, if any, in getting you home, especially if you are in a straight truck or cargo van. If getting home on a regular basis and not at your own expense is important to you, people considering carriers should choose one other than FedEx Custom Critical.