I think there's a decimal problem somewhere. To save $5B based on a 4% savings would mean the original expense was $125 Billion. I'm sure they spend quite a bit but don't think it's that much. Perhaps million is the scale.
I stand corrected,
I should have checked my math more carefully.
It should read 50 Million Dollars not 5 Billion dollars
Thanks LBD, glad someone is paying attention.
6 million miles a day x 365 days = 2.2 billion annual miles
(5+ million loaded miles per day from Schneiders web site and assuming a conservative 20% deadhead miles)
2,200,000,000 / 7.0 mpg = 312,857,143 annual gallons
312,857,143 gallons x $4.00 gallon = $1,251,428,572 annual fuel cost
$1,251,428,572 x .04% fuel savings = $ 50,057,143 annual savings... 50 Million Dollars
if AirTabs worked as promised.
If they worked...
They would test them in a way to PROVE IT.
Then they would sell them to every big carrier.
See : Information Bridge: DOE Scientific and Technical Information - Sponsored by OSTI
"We had originally planned on testing the fuel saving ability of the products with a fleet
partner. However, the fleets we talked to about design issues, as well as the Freightliner LLC
engineers that helped us with our first operations/road test, made it clear that SAE J1321 type II
standardized tests performed by a respected facility were absolutely necessary to gain market
acceptance. For example, a letter from Schneider National (Americas largest private carrier) is
attached (see supplemental information figure 11) which informed us that they do not consider
any product without SAE/TMC test results. Fleet owners are very skeptical of fuel savings
products because they are often approached by companies marketing ineffective products with
exaggerated claims and questionable “test results”."
Last edited: