Conversely, you can tell us how it's set up for free, maintained for free, hosted for free etc. since you know absolutely everything in the universe.
First off, that's never anything (highlighted in bold) that I've ever claimed ...
but it is a logical fallacy that you've repeatedly resorted to in order to deflect and divert ...
Secondly, as to the actual substance - rather than the frivolous ad hominem - of your request:
The basic site and it's content is set up, hosted, and maintained anyways ... it's a cost that is going exist (sunk) - regardless of what language versions are offered.
If a (digital, automated) translation service is used to render a page in a different language (on the fly), then that would involve providing a UI (user interface) - perhaps on each page of the website, or perhaps only on the home page - for the end-user to make a selection of which language to render it in (think pop-up menu where the end-user selects a language). This will be done, regardless of whether "Klingon" is used or not - so that other languages that there are a legitimate need for can be accessed.
The addition of the "Klingon" language may as simple as selecting or adding it to the list of available languages a user has to choose from. It may be as simple as selecting checkbox for "Klingon" ... in addition to Spanish, German, whatever, etc.
You seem to envision a small horde of coders, huddled in some back room, translating pages into Klingon or something, each page of which is hosted and separately maintained ...
While that makes a very entertaining fantasy to get all enraged over, I suspect - from the data available - that that may not actually be what's happening ...
Now ... I've addressed your request ... what are the odds that you'll actually address mine ?
Personally, I put it at less than 1% ...