Just a creature if habit, and it won't stop anytime soon!! and i know it irks you too!
You don't care what I or anyone else thinks, yet you somehow are able to "know" what does and does not irk me. Interesting. You're wrong, in any case.
ok dr turtle, heres classic for you, B/S! saying that disrepecting barry is the same as disrespecting the office is like your take that hoping barrys policies fail is the same as wanting the U.S. to fail...thats crap...
Constantly associating the person with demeaning comments will have an association with the office itself. It's a famously effective tactic, one that the Gay Agenda employs in many ways, for example. It's a tactic that work, whether you specifically set out to do that or not, whether you's smart enough to realize what you are doing or not.
Also, now you're saying that you hope Obama's
policies will fail, which is different than what you have been saying, that you want Obama to fail. It is no small distinction, but one I would be willing to bet you see very little difference in, which is more the pity. In any case, when you want the leader of the nation, be it him personally or the policies that leader employs to lead the nation, to fail, there is no way the nation itself will not at the very least be damaged by the failure, up to the point of total failure itself. Be careful what you wish for, because you just may get it. Perhaps you should think your frothy knee-jerk wants and desires through a little more before taking a stance that is fraught with ignorance and short-sightedness. Perhaps.
as i said before, the libs wanted bush to fail, but they weren't advocating the failure of the whole country, well maybe some were, but not the total of them.
Ignorance knows no political party.
And you are right i have -0- respect for barry.
And without really and truly even knowing why. I have yet to see you offer up any thoughts on any political issues that you didn't first get from someone else.
As for your validation therory, is that your newest deal?
No, it's a long standing element of the nature of human.
you have brought it up in sevarl threads and to be right up front' i couldn't care less what any of you agree or disagree with me on...
Your actions betray you.
if we meant face to face, none of this would be even brought up by me,...
Of course not. You can't cut-n-paste when you're face-to-face.
i don't need validation, i know exactly who i am...
That's pretty funny. Every time you cut-n-paste an article, you are making an attempt at validation. Deny it if you like, but it won't change anything. That is, unless you are admiting to being a sciopath. They rarely, if ever, require any kind of external validation.
And as for calling barry by that name to his face, setup the meeting, thats all ill say until it happens....
Done. I had to pull a lot of strings, but you now have a 9:30 AM Wednesday July 15th appointment with the President in the First Annual Rose Garden Handgun Target Shooting Competition. It's BYOGA (Bring Your Own Guns and Ammunition).
And you are right at 50.1% there is a winner, but it still is not a mandate.....
There ya go, a classic case of trying to convince someone else (me) to believe in something that is not true, in an attempt to validate your own beliefs by getting others to "see things your way."
In the future before you make such blatanly ignorant statements, spend a little quality time with a dictionary.
Please. In the simplest of terms, in politics, a
mandate is the
authority granted by an
electorate to
act as its
representative. So whoever wins the election has the mandate.
However, when three or more people are running for the same office, the winner can win without having more than 50% of the vote. For example, the winner can have 48% of the vote, second place can have 46% of the vote, and the remaining 6% could be to a third candidate, or spread amongst many other candidates. This is a win for the one with 48%, but it is not known as a mandate, much less a mandate to implement his policies at will, because he does not have the mandate of the majority of the people. However, if he wins with 50.1% or more, it is considered a political mandate. Larger margins of victory bolster the winner, but the actual definition of a polical mandate is, in fact, 50.1%.
