This is an ongoing story with news published as developments occur, though it has mostly dropped off the front page.
Three bus crashes are now in the news; one in New York City, one in New Jersey and one in New Hampshire. The New York DOT responded quickly with a very public series of inspections. I view this as an attempt by the DOT to get ahead of the story by showing the public that they are part of the solution and not part of the problem. It didn't work.
Today's
USA Today ran a piece, "
Bus companies in crashes cited for safety violations."
Excerpt:
"Two tour bus companies involved in fatal crashes this month have not received full government safety audits in more than two years, even though roadside inspections found problems that were serious enough to place them on "alert" status.
"The two companies are among hundreds of motor coach operators that have been cited for major safety violations but have faced little oversight of their full operations, a USA TODAY analysis of government records found."
The analysis is of records recently made publicly available by the FMCSA. The release of that information was challenged at the time (
see this).
Since its release the public data has been horribly misused by journalists who -- among other things -- do an inaccurate and superficial analysis of the data and report violations that make truckers and carriers look bad because many of the so-called "fatigued driving" violations have nothing to do with the physical condition of the driver.
The USA Today piece, offers a new twist, using the data to put the DOT in the cross hairs. It that the the DOT/FMCSA has been hoisted with their own petard.