Well, I've spent time sitting in dispatch and I've seen loads that might have a huge fsc like you say but along with that they've got huge d/h to the shipper followed by huge d/h to a decent layover spot after delivery. I've run loads and know of plenty of loads that had as much d/h as paid miles. The bottom line on pay was at or above the acceptable threshold so the load was taken.
Using your $1.25 example, that would dilute the fsc to 62.5cpm fsc. That's still more than the claimed 41cpm fsc but then there's that "special" company that gets the same service with only a 63cpm fsc. That amounts to .315cpm fsc overall and Fedex is still paying that 41cpm to the truck for all miles driven.
There are times it would definitely be better getting 100% fsc on a specific run and there are times the current system is definitely better. One has to choose one system or the other though and it's nice to know you are getting money for every mile you drive. Driving miles for free just tastes bad.
To us it is much easier to have our carrier pay us to move then to look up loads. That is a personal preference as I am sure Dave you find some really good paying loads for people you help out and your drivers.
I see the bigger issue as transparency from the carrier. It has little to do with whether "it is enough" so it must be ok. If one is only getting it when they follow the carriers direction, then it really isn't any different at Panther. If you go somewhere other than where the EM is directed, then you lose that revenue.
As to Leo's post, I think there are some distinct differences in that he is running solo. In his example of DHing the same length of a run would be non existent in my world. We have never done that since I have been at Panther. I would find my own load before I would even consider it unless there was a bonus equal to the loaded miles.
We are similar in that we look at the load on its face value. I don't want to hear that the FSC is low because they are subsidising another or anything else. It either is profitable or it isn't. And yes, I want the 100 percent of the FSC rather than a prescribed formula from a third party that says that should be enough.
It is just a preference. Nothing to do with ripping a carrier or anything else. If the FSC or the rate is unsatisfactory, I will find my own loads and not worry about it.
When one works as I do, at my own direction in regards to deadheading, etc .. all I want is 100% FSC that is on that load. And at Landstar I get it. It is a part of the dispatch offer.
This goes back to that thread about which carrier "cares more" for the O/O ..... don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining!
Make me an honest offer, and I will decide whether I accept it.
This load and location I am in today is a perfect example.
Almost $2,000, truck pay, including FSC, from Racine, Wi to Taft. Tx, (by Corpus).
Good rate, bad place to end up empty. But it was only 150 miles back up to Houston.
But wait .. along the way I was offered to pick up at the San Antonio airport and come on down to Brownsville area. An even worse loading area .... but .. it paid $2.00 a mile for the additional miles
So my $2,000 load just became $2400 .. Good deal, and I ask that no one be responsible for deadheading me anywhere, I knew this was a bad loading area when I took the load.
At the end of the day, if I have not been loaded, I will dh to Houston on my dime ..... and I will not even consider Landstar owes me a deadhead, or fuel charge to relocate.