Homofascism on the rise

Status
Not open for further replies.

davekc

Senior Moderator
Staff member
Fleet Owner
Just think when this passes. That will be followed by people who want to marry many or anything.
One can use their imagination on the "anything". AMonger will go in to convulsions.
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
Just think when this passes. That will be followed by people who want to marry many or anything.
That's certainly the weird fear, but nothing in human history nor human nature would indicate that.

On the other hand, when you start redefining well-established terms to suit your needs, all kinds of slippery slopes appear.
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
Amonger is spot on with that one. They demand straight-up approval, pure and simple. If one doesn't approve of and embrace (as normal and perfectly acceptable) homosexuality and homosexuals, they are branded as homophobic, which is a pejorative invented by homosexuals to make people feel guilty for not being wholly accepting. They use the term "civil rights" to make people feel guilty, because no one wants to be thought of as denying someone their civil rights, yet "gay rights" are special rights, not civil rights. They want to redefine "marriage" to mean something else, so that they can demand it as part of their civil rights. Homosexuals currently have exactly the same rights as everyone else when it comes to marriage. Exactly. They want special rights by redefining what marriage is.

This is one of the best statements / views over this whole ordeal that has come across this board in quite a while.........

Have to give Turtle credit for this.......Credit for either C & P'ing it from somewhere else, or coming up with it on his own.

Either one...........2 Thumbs Up.

Don't get used to it though..................................:cool:
 

aquitted

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Please be advised that the views expressed by amonger are not necesarily those of true Christians.
 

Ragman

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
He will probably get back to you on that. He isn't done watching.;)

dvd_peep.jpg
 

cheri1122

Veteran Expediter
Driver
Amonger is spot on with that one. They demand straight-up approval, pure and simple. If one doesn't approve of and embrace (as normal and perfectly acceptable) homosexuality and homosexuals, they are branded as homophobic, which is a pejorative invented by homosexuals to make people feel guilty for not being wholly accepting. They use the term "civil rights" to make people feel guilty, because no one wants to be thought of as denying someone their civil rights, yet "gay rights" are special rights, not civil rights. They want to redefine "marriage" to mean something else, so that they can demand it as part of their civil rights. Homosexuals currently have exactly the same rights as everyone else when it comes to marriage. Exactly. They want special rights by redefining what marriage is.

Notice that homosexuals no longer refer to same-sex marriage as "same-sex" or "homosexual" marriage, as that would differentiate it from traditional marriage, but rather us "equal" marriage instead, because the psychology of using carefully selected terminology to make people think the different types of marriages are all the same becomes important to getting what they want. They want it to be equal, so they keep on repeating it over and over in the hopes that if they repeat it enough times people will believe it. Clearly they're right, based on yours and other's responses on the subject.

I haven't been persuaded by repetition, but by longtime exposure to enough gay people to believe that they are just like anyone/everyone else. [I'm pretty sure when I was a proofreader in Houston, Tx, 20 years ago, I was the only straight person in the whole place!]
I have to disagree that approval is what they want - maybe some of the militant fringe types do, but they no more represent the entirety of homosexuals than AMonger represents Christians or expediters.
They want people to stop calling them names, beating them up, refusing to rent to and/or employ them, and all the other liberties the rest of us enjoy. And they want to marry the person whom they choose to spend the rest of their lives with, too.
With the heterosexual divorce rate where it is, who are we to call it sacred?
 

Turtle

Administrator
Staff member
Retired Expediter
And they want to marry the person whom they choose to spend the rest of their lives with, too.
I want to marry the person I choose to spend the rest of my life with, too, but Jennifer Aniston isn't having any of it.
 

aquitted

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Ah, an edit... The views espoused by me are orthodox (the adjective, not the denomination) Christian doctrine.
Christianity doesn't teach hate (except in your book) Christianity doesn't put people in bondage He sets us free. You have a very bad interpetation of His Word and you are A false prophet who needs to repent.
Strange how you are doing the same things you blasted Joel Osteen for doing.
Maybe you haven't noticed but where your screen name is there are some letters missing it's spelled Amonger instead of Hatemonger maybe you should put the rest of the letters in there so it would be complete.
I also would be interested in where you attend church and who your pastor is and what Bible teaching programs you watch.
 

asjssl

Veteran Expediter
Fleet Owner
Not suddenly, but wrong, yes. Hellfire & ****ation still stand.
There is violence in our past, sure. There are things that we discover as we go, from truth to truth, as the Bible says.There was the Inquisition and such that we learn as we go that we've departed from sound doctrine.
We can stop an Inquisition. But hellfire & ****ation, that's out of our control.
How is it you can type ****ation but when I do, it's only ****ation? ****ation doesn't seem to be a word worth censoring.

,...............
 

Attachments

  • 1365538795951.jpg
    1365538795951.jpg
    39.1 KB · Views: 32

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
The opening chapter to Romans explains Gods view on Homesexuality. Basically, homsexuality IS a direct judgement from God. Homosexuals are that way because God has given them up.

Before all the fake christians jump my case. They should read the first chapter of Romans, and ask themselves what else it could possibly mean.

Next,
In a recent conversation my dad said " God will surely punish us for this homosexual marriage stuff", my response was to say, "Homosexual marriage IS a Judgement, things are going to get much worse."

Also HomoFascism is a word incorrectly applied here. Unless were are talking about Homosexual owned bussiness calluding with governemnt to regulate their competitors out of bussiness.

I think a more correct term would be HomoTotalitianism.

Right now the US is Fascist, bussiness interests callude with the governemnt to create regulations that destroy their competitors.

The US is NOT totalitarian, in that the people still have some rights though the NDAA has esentially set up the legal framework for a totalitarian regime.

Words have meaning, Nazi Germanys governemnt was a Fascist Totalitarian Dictatorial National Socialist Regime.

The US is currently a Fascist International Socialist Democracy.

It is supposed to be a Constitutional Republic.

If it still was there would be no talk of Homototalitarianism because the government would be too weak to enforce it.
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
Incidently,
Jeremy Irons a gay libertarian thinks Homosexual Marriage is a canard(as do I) and he predicts when it is allowed lawyers are gonna have a field day with it.

Estate planners will begin recomending Fathers marry their sons to avoid estate tax's.

PS there isn't a single state or even country that bans homosexuals from getting married it is a total cunnard and those of you who support Gay Marriage are just dupes.

Marriage is open to any person reguardless of sexual orientation. I've been married twice and nobody asked me if I was queer. So I really don't get the issue.
 

aquitted

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
How is it you can type ****ation but when I do, it's only ****ation? ****ation doesn't seem to be a word worth censoring.

Turtle, I don't know how you did that but it's pretty funny.
I still laugh every time i see it.
 

asjssl

Veteran Expediter
Fleet Owner
Well, unless your row of dots has some heretofore unknown celestial meaning I'm not aware of, yes.

To be 100% honest..I posted that pic...and it said my message was to short...so I added some punctuation to make the post go through..since I had nothing to add to the picture...so I guess I am a wimp..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top