Well, Chef, you may have a degree from the University of Michigan, but that doesn't mean you are an educated man regarding this topic. Unless, of course, your degree is in Middle Eastern Studies, or something. Case in point:
"that fact is that from birth, muslums are raise according to their religous teachings to either convert [or] kill the infidels,"
That's simply not true for the vast majority of Muslims. Just like the Bible, the Qur'an (or the Koran, if you like) can be interpreted in many ways. And just like with Christianity and Judaism, Islam has people who do nothing but study and interpret the Qur'an. Some do it well, some don't. Some will interpret it in a certain way specifically for political or personal power reasons. Islam, Judaism and Christianity all have a long and rich history of religious interpretations that smack of political foundations, of expansions and dominations. Onward Christian Soldiers. Follow the money, follow the power.
If you think about it for a minute, if all Muslims are on a mission from God to kill all non-Muslims and rule the world under Islamic rule, then why, after nearly 1400 years, are there any non-Muslims running around the planet? For that matter, considering the population imbalance there, why are there any non-Muslims in Dearborn, not to mention the Middle East in general? Are they all that inept at killing infidels? If every Muslim would just kill one non-Muslim a week, they'd have total control in no time. A few months at most. What's the problem? Git r dun.
Incidentally, infidels and non-believers, which is what the Qur'an talks about, is not the same as non-Muslims. People Of The Book, "The Book" being the Bible, are not a part of the non-believers and infidels crowd. People Of The Book are Christians and Jews, and they believe in the same God as the Muslims believe in. Yep, same God, exactly. The problems come when his teachings are misinterpreted, and that happens in all three religions.
Have you ever read the Qur'an? If you choose to be a racist in this regard, I would think that you would have wanted to read it, to educate yourself, in order to be better prepared in your battles with them. If for nothing else, to be able to use it against them and to be able to better predict their reactions. In any case, I strongly recommend reading it. Just like many sections of the Bible, the sections of the Qur'an that talk of killing infidels, if taken out of context (which the extremists routinely do), means just that - convert them or kill them. However, taken in context, the killings are to only take place under very strict guidlines, primarily in self-defense, mainly in a time of war when Islam is being attacked. The Bible is not unlike the Qur'an in that respect. The Bible shows justification for killing, but not murder, same as the Qur'an.
"Again, you coddle them, me i am for the total eliminatation of them."
Coddle them? Me? Hardly. The extremists, the ones who want to do me and others harm, I'm right there with ya. It's self-defense, plain and simple. But, where we drift apart is I refuse to lump non-extremists in with the extremists.
I do support profiling, though. I don't know where this crap came about that profiling is racist. It's not. Even racial profiling isn't racist. It's profilist. It might just so happen that the profile comprises a certain race, but that doesn't make the profile itself racist. Racial profiling would be racist if it was implemented in a racist manner, meaning that you were profiling a certain race solely becaue of their race, and not because their race fit into a certain profile. If you're looking for some bad people, and they all happen to be between six feet and six feet three inches tall, then the profile is people between 6' and 6'3" and you're not going to concentrate on people who are well under 6 feet tall. If you're looking for some bad people, and they all happen to be of Middle Eastern descent, it would make little or no sense to waste time messing with blue eyed blonds from Sweden. And if you're looking for bad people, and they all happen to be Muslim, you'd better concentrate on anyone who is a Muslim, and cull out the bad from the good. All that profiling does is narrow down the search. Period. You eliminate that which is irrelevant with a profile. And then within that profile you eliminate further that which doesn't apply. It's that simple. Nothing racist about it.
As for the Internment Camps of WWII, in the context of the time and place, it made perfect sense. It was profiling that was logical. It's unfortunate that it had to be done, but it was logical and prudent. Better to be safe than stupid. As far as Muslims in the US are concerned, something should be done, but Internment isn't logical nor prudent, and following the methods of Dominic Guzman ("Kill them all. God will know his own.") wouldn't exactly be logical or prudent, either, although I'm sure you would approve.
Dominic Guzman is the one who came up with the Three Degrees of torture. First Degree, thumbscrews. Second Degree, bastinado (foot whipping). Third Degree, the burning of the flesh under the armpits (and is where we get the term Third Degree Burns from).
Maybe we should just beat it out of them.