You got that right. Robert Reich, Labor Secretary under Clinton. Didn't have any previous private sector work experience, but he was the expert on how to create jobs. HahaThat is about like saying Hillary was a lawyer, a senator, and sort of head of the state department. and saying she is qualified to be President.
Then again, there is that "community organizer" requirement she lacks. lol
The quote by Reich is spoken by someone who has been in government too long. He lumps people that oppose certain policies as the 'haters'. Most that oppose don't hate illegal aliens, blacks, gays, or women. They might disagree with how immigration is being handled, the lax voter laws, disagree on the definition of marriage, and whether religious institutions or companies can oppose certain contraceptives. Instead Reich plays the immigrant card, the gay card, the contraception card, the war on women card, and the hater card. Yep, spoken like someone who has been in government and politics too long.
Well, considering it's from The Gateway Pundit - the home of The Stupidest Man On The Internet, Jim Hoft - I guess we shouldn't be surprised that the headline is FALSE ...
IOW: no $6,000 per month for housing a single individual.
And, quite frankly, I'm not really surprised that despite the fact that a picture of one of these purported ads was included with the article itself, you failed to make that observation as well ...
That's some keen observation and really deep insight there ...
Froth on Bro ...
Reich is an academic - a theoretician who developed himself inside the bubbles of college campuses and think tanks, then moved to government administration, always avoiding the harsh realities of the private sector and real-world experience. Sounds a lot like Obama.
The point I was making is that the ad can very easily be interpreted as offering $6k for one child, and that article cited isn't the only one to see it that way. It's safe to say the vague wording is not unintentional.
AD OFFERS MORE THAN $6000 PER MONTH TO HOUSE FOREIGN MINORS
by KRISTIN TATE
...Lisa Maloney Vinton, a Murrieta resident, provided Breitbart Texas with a purported copy of the advertisement, which was put up by the Crittenton Services and Foster Family Agency. It says, "Help heal the wounds ... for children in foster care programs including survivors of human trafficking and unaccompanied refugee minors."
Parents who offer up their homes could have a child placed in their home in "as short as 45 days" and be paid up to $6,054 per month, according to the advertisement.
Cindy Lemos, another Murrieta resident, told Breitbart Texas that she called the number on the advertisement. She said, "I called this afternoon and the gentlemen I spoke to told me that they are receiving the illegal immigrants but that none of them are under the age of 12. I asked him where all the younger children were... he told me that he was wondering the exact same thing."
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Texas/2014/07/10/Ad-Offers-More-Than-$6000-Per-Month-to-House-Foreign-Minors
That stuff must be taught in the school of asshattery to which you referred recently. On the other hand, more info about conditions in Central America continues to leak out:
The point I was making is that the ad can very easily be interpreted as offering $6k for one child, and that article cited isn't the only one to see it that way. It's safe to say the vague wording is not unintentional.That "vague" wording is like the ads that promise "O down, 0 due at signing" for leasing cars: they just want to get you in the place with your hopes high, and then they'll explain the details. [Actually, the "up to" is a red flag, if you're paying attention.] The $6054 figure is for six kids - and if the documentation is half as extensive as for other government programs, it's pretty low for the time involved for ONE kid, much less six.
If you think foster parenting 6 [non English speaking] illegal aliens and/or gang members is "not a bad deal", then sign up for it, and let us know how it works out.
Since you obviously missed the connection I'll restate: it's not a bad deal for the existing illegals, gang members or squatting relatives that are already here to be paid to foster these illegal "children" over the age of 12.If you think foster parenting 6 [non English speaking] illegal aliens and/or gang members is "not a bad deal", then sign up for it, and let us know how it works out.
https://www.dfps.state.tx.us/Adoption_and_Foster_Care/Get_Started/requirements.asp
Just how many illegals, gang members, and squatters do you think meet the requirements?
I swear, y'all seem to think the government just hands money to anyone who asks.
