The price of fuel in other countries is irrelevant: we live & work in America. We ought to be concerned with our own government first, and most.
The greed of "big oil" is condoned by the current administration, many of whom have a vested interest in the profits.
The price of oil is influenced as much, if not more than, by the attitude of Wall Street, as by supply & demand - a ludicrous state of affairs, IMO.
Even if a 'strike' were possible, it would have as many negative effects as positive, if there were any positive effects at all. Neither the politicians, nor the public, would have much sympathy - most of them don't have a lot of respect for us as it is
Terry is absolutely correct in his portrayal of the fuel surcharge. But: there being no law to demand that 100% of the FS go to those who pay for the fuel, you can bet that some of it does not. An O/O can of course, demand to see the prices paid to the carrier on each load, but an O/O who does not trust his carrier is one who will be looking for another, in short order.
The increase in fuel prices is just one of many factors that affect our profit margins - and again, Terry is right: it's the price of freight that has not kept pace with reality. There doesn't seem much hope of changing that, however, with the constant supply of new drivers available, and the threat of an even greater influx, from Mexico.
The consumption of fuel, though, is one of the few areas in which the driver has the power to change the status quo. If every driver who pays for their fuel refused to waste it by driving above 55 mph, (particularly in this area, where speed of delivery is prized) it would make a powerful statement indeed.
The greed of "big oil" is condoned by the current administration, many of whom have a vested interest in the profits.
The price of oil is influenced as much, if not more than, by the attitude of Wall Street, as by supply & demand - a ludicrous state of affairs, IMO.
Even if a 'strike' were possible, it would have as many negative effects as positive, if there were any positive effects at all. Neither the politicians, nor the public, would have much sympathy - most of them don't have a lot of respect for us as it is
Terry is absolutely correct in his portrayal of the fuel surcharge. But: there being no law to demand that 100% of the FS go to those who pay for the fuel, you can bet that some of it does not. An O/O can of course, demand to see the prices paid to the carrier on each load, but an O/O who does not trust his carrier is one who will be looking for another, in short order.
The increase in fuel prices is just one of many factors that affect our profit margins - and again, Terry is right: it's the price of freight that has not kept pace with reality. There doesn't seem much hope of changing that, however, with the constant supply of new drivers available, and the threat of an even greater influx, from Mexico.
The consumption of fuel, though, is one of the few areas in which the driver has the power to change the status quo. If every driver who pays for their fuel refused to waste it by driving above 55 mph, (particularly in this area, where speed of delivery is prized) it would make a powerful statement indeed.