It is worded wrong........
But Gosh......it seemed like you would've figured it out and corrected it for us.
The Stabbing Occured.....or "Allegedly" happened....
The stabbing was not alleged, it is an undisputed fact.
So NO....Armed Bystander did NOT "stop" stabbing. He more or less hindered any futher stabbings of "alleged" victim.
Victim is not alleged, but is in fact, a victim.
We can't say armed bystander prevented possible Murder.....
Yes we can, because he did - key word is 'possible', though 'probable' is more apt, IMO.
cause we really don't know what the "alleged" suspects intent was when he was "allegedly" stabbing victim.
Neither the suspect nor the stabbing is alleged, which says you don't know what the word you're treating with contempt actually means.
Which makes me think your allegedly informed opinion is misinformed, and therefore worthless.
Armed citizens can and do prevent crimes all the time. This isn't a news item, it's just saying [crowing, actually] "See? I'm right & you're wrong!" to those who disagree on the issue of the right to bear arms.
It does nothing to further a conversation on the subject, IMO.
I agree with Bob Wolf........alleged stabber should have been removed by the Medical Examiners Office via a Body Bag from the "alleged" crime scene......
