RLENT
Veteran Expediter
So lemme see if I get this straight ..... Walmart is generally reviled by most, for exactly what you describe above (undercutting everyone and driving the small businessman out) - so when they don't do that y'all have a problem with it - simply because of WHO it is that they're not doing it to ? Maybe they're trying to turn over a new leaf ?The "little more" in this case is deviating from their normal practice of undercutting everyone else and for this one group of people promising to always price higher than them.
Maybe that change in behavior ought to be encouraged (not killing off the small business person ....) - rather than castigating them for it.
Undoubtedly there is - but I'd guess that we see it slightly differently - you see Walmart as providing preferential treatment to those who are different than you.There is a definite issue presented in the article.
I see it as them merely being smart about business and getting their foot in the door in a particular community - one who is probably prone more than most perhaps to be somewhat isolationist.
One thing is for sure - every dollar that gets spent at Walmart is a dollar that probably isn't going to go to a Muslim extremist group. Maybe ya oughta count your blessings ....
My question is this - how many of you who are finding a problem with this, are patronizing the "evil" Walmart - because they are so much cheaper than your local small business person ? Or because it's so convenient to be able to get so much at one stop ?
How many of you are accepting their hospitality by parking in their lots to layover ?
My problem isn't with presentation style - it's with what I see as the motivation. And it isn't based on this single post.If folks would quit trying to fault David for presentation style and read the content with eyes and mind open they'd see the problem that's clearly there.
However I could be entirely incorrect on my perception of things .... it does happen .... even if rarely.
One last thing, if the point of the original post was pandering to a particular group and preferential treatment then why not just come out and state that plainly - and leave no doubt as to one's thoughts (or motivations) ?
Last edited: