... This has much more in common with a nutjob Going Postal on his co-workers than is does a typical terrorist attack on an innocent public. The additional factors of his name and his religion are certainly factors, as are his political motivations, but they aren't the only factors to be considered. If he had done the same thing at the Court Square or at the mall in Killeen, yeah, an unbelievably strong argument would have to be made for a terrorist act, but this was a man shooting co-workers in an enclosed space at his workplace. It is almost a certainty that this is not as simple as either scenario.
Maybe - but the theory that he was attacking those that he believed to be making war on his fellow muslims is in sync with his radical beliefs. The more information that continues to leak out, the more it seems that he was a true-blue jihadist. On the business cards he had printed for himself, he list titles of SoA (Soldier of Allah) and SWT (Subwanahu Wa Ta'all, translation - "Glory to God").
Furthermore, it appears he had multiple e-mail accounts listed under pseudonyms that might have been used to communicate with fellow soldiers of Allah. It wouldn't take an Army brain surgeon to figure out it's best not using your own name when communicating over the internet with an imam directly connected to the 911 attackers.
Granted, we're having to depend on our beloved MSM for all this information so there's more than a few grains of salt included. But what makes a forum like this interesting is the exchange of ideas, theories and speculation - if they were all the same it woudn't be any fun.
And the grassy knoll theory? You're right - Oswald wasn't the only shooter there for sure