AMonger
Veteran Expediter
FBI Joy Ride Wrecks Ferrari,
DOJ Refuses to Pay Damages
US government refuses to pay
damages for Ferrari F50
destroyed during an FBI joy
ride.
The US Department of Justice
is deploying all of its legal
muscle to avoid paying the
price after an FBI agent
destroyed an exotic car during
a joy ride. After nearly two
years of trying to recover the
money owed by the
government, Motors Insurance
Company filed a lawsuit
against the government
seeking the full $750,000
value of the wrecked 1995
Ferrari F50.
The vehicle originally had been
stolen in 2003 from a Ferrari
dealer in Pennsylvania. Motors
paid the $630,000 insurance
claim, giving the firm title to
the missing exotic. On August
12, 2008, the FBI stumbled
upon the car in Kentucky
during a separate
investigation. The agency held
the vehicle with permission
from Motors. On May 27,
2009, FBI Special Agent
Frederick C. Kingston got
behind the wheel of a 1995
Ferrari F50 with by Assistant
US Attorney J. Hamilton
Thompson in the passenger
seat.
"Just a few seconds after we
left the parking lot, we went
around a curve, and the rear
of the car began sliding,"
Thompson wrote in an email
to Managing Assistant US
Attorney E.J. Walbourn on the
day of the incident. "The
agent tried to regain control,
but the car fishtailed and slid
sideways up onto the curb.
The vehicle came to rest
against a row of bushes and a
small tree. Both myself and
the agent exited of our own
power."
A claims adjuster noted the
frame was bent, rendering the
vehicle -- now worth $750,000
in working condition -- a total
loss. DOJ began stonewalling
when Motors tried to get
information about what
happened. The agency refused
to honor a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request
for any documents regarding
the storage and use of the
vehicle on the day of the
accident. The request was
denied as "an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy."
Motors filed a separate lawsuit
to force the disclosure of
agency records concerning the
Ferrari.
"Based on the denial of
Motors Insurance Company's
claim, plaintiff anticipates that
DOJ and FBI will claim
immunity against civil liability
under 28 USC Section 2680(c)
and assert that the vehicle was
damaged while in the
detention of law enforcement
authorities," Motors attorney
Richard C. Kraus wrote in an
April 14 lawsuit. "The
information requested under
FOIA and withheld by DOJ and
FBI will be necessary to
determine whether 28 USC
Section 2680(c) applies."
That is precisely what DOJ has
done. The agency insists
sovereign immunity prohibits
the suit, and no negligence
claim can arise because
federal law prohibits claims
against the government for
goods damaged while
detained by law enforcement.
"The exception applies to bar
suit against the United States
and does not permit litigation
over the reasonableness of the
law enforcement officer's
conduct in question," Assistant
Attorney General Tony West
wrote in a May 9 brief to the
court. "The broad
interpretation of the
detention-of-goods exception,
coupled with the necessity
that the court construe the
United States' waiver of
sovereign immunity strictly in
favor of the sovereign, require
a finding that the United
States has not consented to
this sort of suit and plaintiff
has failed to state a claim
under federal law.
Accordingly, the United States
respectfully requests that the
above-captioned action be
dismissed with prejudice."
US District Judge Avern Cohn
on Tuesday set a June 22 date
for final briefs on the
government's motion to
dismiss the suit.
DOJ Refuses to Pay Damages
US government refuses to pay
damages for Ferrari F50
destroyed during an FBI joy
ride.
The US Department of Justice
is deploying all of its legal
muscle to avoid paying the
price after an FBI agent
destroyed an exotic car during
a joy ride. After nearly two
years of trying to recover the
money owed by the
government, Motors Insurance
Company filed a lawsuit
against the government
seeking the full $750,000
value of the wrecked 1995
Ferrari F50.
The vehicle originally had been
stolen in 2003 from a Ferrari
dealer in Pennsylvania. Motors
paid the $630,000 insurance
claim, giving the firm title to
the missing exotic. On August
12, 2008, the FBI stumbled
upon the car in Kentucky
during a separate
investigation. The agency held
the vehicle with permission
from Motors. On May 27,
2009, FBI Special Agent
Frederick C. Kingston got
behind the wheel of a 1995
Ferrari F50 with by Assistant
US Attorney J. Hamilton
Thompson in the passenger
seat.
"Just a few seconds after we
left the parking lot, we went
around a curve, and the rear
of the car began sliding,"
Thompson wrote in an email
to Managing Assistant US
Attorney E.J. Walbourn on the
day of the incident. "The
agent tried to regain control,
but the car fishtailed and slid
sideways up onto the curb.
The vehicle came to rest
against a row of bushes and a
small tree. Both myself and
the agent exited of our own
power."
A claims adjuster noted the
frame was bent, rendering the
vehicle -- now worth $750,000
in working condition -- a total
loss. DOJ began stonewalling
when Motors tried to get
information about what
happened. The agency refused
to honor a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request
for any documents regarding
the storage and use of the
vehicle on the day of the
accident. The request was
denied as "an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy."
Motors filed a separate lawsuit
to force the disclosure of
agency records concerning the
Ferrari.
"Based on the denial of
Motors Insurance Company's
claim, plaintiff anticipates that
DOJ and FBI will claim
immunity against civil liability
under 28 USC Section 2680(c)
and assert that the vehicle was
damaged while in the
detention of law enforcement
authorities," Motors attorney
Richard C. Kraus wrote in an
April 14 lawsuit. "The
information requested under
FOIA and withheld by DOJ and
FBI will be necessary to
determine whether 28 USC
Section 2680(c) applies."
That is precisely what DOJ has
done. The agency insists
sovereign immunity prohibits
the suit, and no negligence
claim can arise because
federal law prohibits claims
against the government for
goods damaged while
detained by law enforcement.
"The exception applies to bar
suit against the United States
and does not permit litigation
over the reasonableness of the
law enforcement officer's
conduct in question," Assistant
Attorney General Tony West
wrote in a May 9 brief to the
court. "The broad
interpretation of the
detention-of-goods exception,
coupled with the necessity
that the court construe the
United States' waiver of
sovereign immunity strictly in
favor of the sovereign, require
a finding that the United
States has not consented to
this sort of suit and plaintiff
has failed to state a claim
under federal law.
Accordingly, the United States
respectfully requests that the
above-captioned action be
dismissed with prejudice."
US District Judge Avern Cohn
on Tuesday set a June 22 date
for final briefs on the
government's motion to
dismiss the suit.