greg334
Veteran Expediter
I think this is a great thing but I find this really odd.
This gives a great edge in regards of contractor relations and selling the company to both customers and contractors.
But I am confused about the problem that this would have with the IRS and the Department of Labor.
First the IRS will tax every dime of this because it is a contractor getting the money/access.
Second the DOL has strict rules about training contractors; it has to be related to a specific product/procedures or something unique to the company and only what is needed to do the job at that company. Companies are forbidden to train people for common software packages, like MS office or all them access to course like English, math or other common things. Once a company decides to provide access to education or training for contractors, they are employees. Unless they changed the rules recently, it has been this way for a long time and I know a lot of former contractors who sued to become employees over this very issue.
This gives a great edge in regards of contractor relations and selling the company to both customers and contractors.
But I am confused about the problem that this would have with the IRS and the Department of Labor.
First the IRS will tax every dime of this because it is a contractor getting the money/access.
Second the DOL has strict rules about training contractors; it has to be related to a specific product/procedures or something unique to the company and only what is needed to do the job at that company. Companies are forbidden to train people for common software packages, like MS office or all them access to course like English, math or other common things. Once a company decides to provide access to education or training for contractors, they are employees. Unless they changed the rules recently, it has been this way for a long time and I know a lot of former contractors who sued to become employees over this very issue.