Yes, that's what I said. I did my homework, I thought. I researched several companies online. I talked to a couple of recruiters. They said, "We are turning down as much freight as we are hauling." I told them I was thinking about getting a Sprinter van. Finally, one of them checked out my DMV record and said, "If you get a van we will put you to work." NOT!!! I got a van, but so far they have not put me to work; at least not what I would call "work." In my first three weeks I got four loads for a total of 2,543 paid miles. For you mathematically challenged folks that's an average of 1.3 loads and 847 miles per week. That is not what I call being "put to work." After six weeks I have had 10 loads for a total of 6,147 paid miles. That is an average of 1.6 loads and 1,024 miles per week. A little improvement but not enough. I expected to be running at least
2,000 miles per week--minimum. Is that unrealistic? I don't think so. On two different occasions I have sat for over four days waiting for my next load. When I inquire about moving I am told, "There is usually lots of freight within a 100 mile radius of where you are at. We don't understand why we are not getting any right now.
All of the loads seem to be for the larger straight trucks and tractor-trailers."
My point is this: Why can't the recruiters be honest and up front. They have to know what is going on. Why can't they say, "Well, things
are not very good right now for cargo vans. You might want to consider a bigger truck or a different line of work." But, no, they just keep signing on more cargo vans without any regard to whether there is any work for them or not. I guess they have their quotas to meet. I have done everything they told me to do: I have stayed
"in service," I haven't turned down any loads, and I didn't go home until I had three weeks out on the road.
Oh! Wait! I get it. This is a test, right? They just want to see if the newby is going to stick it out for a while before they really put him to work, right? That's got to be what is going on.
Somebody please enlighten me.
2,000 miles per week--minimum. Is that unrealistic? I don't think so. On two different occasions I have sat for over four days waiting for my next load. When I inquire about moving I am told, "There is usually lots of freight within a 100 mile radius of where you are at. We don't understand why we are not getting any right now.
All of the loads seem to be for the larger straight trucks and tractor-trailers."
My point is this: Why can't the recruiters be honest and up front. They have to know what is going on. Why can't they say, "Well, things
are not very good right now for cargo vans. You might want to consider a bigger truck or a different line of work." But, no, they just keep signing on more cargo vans without any regard to whether there is any work for them or not. I guess they have their quotas to meet. I have done everything they told me to do: I have stayed
"in service," I haven't turned down any loads, and I didn't go home until I had three weeks out on the road.
Oh! Wait! I get it. This is a test, right? They just want to see if the newby is going to stick it out for a while before they really put him to work, right? That's got to be what is going on.
Somebody please enlighten me.