I'm certain EO (meaning the people who work at the EO office) will think about a Hall of Fame, and even about the Driver of the Month idea you suggested in another thread. The problem is these folks have about 10,000 other things to think about too.
They are up to their eyeballs in web site administration, magazine publishing, planning and conducting workshops and trade shows, and much more. On top of all that, they are runnnig a business, which means time and attention to the activities all businesses share; sales and marketing, employment, accounting, etc.
The History of Expediting project got the green light because people have stepped forward to make it happen, and are willing to invest the thousands of hours it will take to see it through. Driver recognition programs like Hall of Fame and Driver of the Month sound great ideas but they require work too.
I think driver recognition programs would be a fantastic addition to EO, but it would be an administrative burden too. For them to work, someone, or a group of folks will need to decide who to recognize, how, and when. That takes you to a place where many people fear to tread; politics and egos. The instant you choose one person for inclusion, you will hear from people who dislike your choice, either because they dislike that person, or because they like someone better.
To make choices that you can defend, an objective screening process would be in order, but who decides what that will be, and how will it be administered?
The history project is easier in that regard because we seek to talk not about drivers who are worthy of recognition, but drivers whose experience best illustrates expediter lives and times as expediting emerged and grew.