>Al:
>
>More often than we'd like, a full skid at 48" height will
>barely slide in. If you add another 1/2 inch it might hurt
>you chances to get loaded. If you have a sprinter, Lap2's
>idea is perfect.
>
>I think I'm in the minority by not liking E-track on the
>floor. It gets very dirty and can't be cleaned well And, A
>broken metal tub leg or an errant nail on a 1000# pallet
>could easily get caught in the track and prevent the easy
>pull to the rear for unloading. I prefer a high and a low
>row of track on each wall to accomodate any securement
>situation.
>
>Terry
I concur Terry; however, the company I am considering I believe requires deck e track. My previous company didn't reqire this and I use a system with 1X12" s down the sides of the cargo deck 50" apart. I used 2X4's with brackets on each end that I screwed in with a power driver to the 1X12"s to toe in the pallet fore and aft in addition to the wall e tracks.
This seemed a clean way to secure freight. Deck securement with either my previous method or deck e track is more secure method than securing high, also some freight is short and heavy. I have used this method at sea and it works, out there if something breaks loose it may be a few days until you can attempt to solve.
We're enjoying our time off here in the Branson area. What a place to live!
Thanks