Dr. Kissinger Runs the National Security Council

chefdennis · Mar 24, 2009

Ok forget that this is from Alex Jones, he can be a bit over the top at times , but he can be a slow curve ahead of the count at other times and this looks like one of those time he is ahead of the rest.

So barry as more then a few appointments from the TriLateral Commission in his cabinet. Now we have the head of the National Security Council stating that he take his orders from Dr. Kissinger!!! Not Barry, but Kissinger. Now Kissinger has never hid his efforts to engage american in a NWO, and now he has the ear and obvisously a bit more of the sitting president that is nothing but a socialist. This just looks funny, but hey, what do i know....

Make sure you open and read both links.........Greg?, Turtle? Randy? Layout? Your thought??

NSC advisor Jones: “I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger”

http://www.infowars.com/nsc-advisor-...-dr-kissinger/

Infowars
March 23, 2009

Last week a caller to the Alex Jones Show mentioned a speech transcript posted on the CFR website where U.S. National Security Adviser Jones declared the following:

Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through Generaal (sic) Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.

Remarks by National Security Adviser Jones at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy - Council on Foreign Relations

Jones made the remark at the 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof on February 8, 2009.

Mr. Jones is basically telling us the National Security Council is run by Henry Kissinger. The NSC is the principal forum used by Obama for considering national security and foreign policy matters. Biden, Clinton, Geithner, Gates, Mullen, Emanuel, Summers, and others are listed as participants, but not Henry Kissinger.

In 2006, the Associated Press reported that Kissinger advised Bush and Cheney, a fact included in Bob Woodward’s book “State of Denial.”

In other words, the Bush and Obama administrations — never mind the “change” rhetoric — receive the same advice (instructions) from the ruling elite.

Earlier this year, Kissinger went on the floor of the stock market to declare Obama had a chance to create a New World Order.

Said Kissinger:

He can give a new impetus to American Foreign policy, partly because the perception of him is so extraordinary around the world. I think his task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when really a New World Order can be created — it’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.

Kissinger — along with David Rockefeller, Paul Arthur Allaire, and Richard Holbrooke — directs the American Friends of Bilderberg. He is also connected to the globalist Aspen Institute, the Committee of 300, the Trilateral Commission, and sits on the advisory board of JP Morgan Chase.

“Kissinger has been patiently waiting since at least 1973 for his New World Order egg to hatch,” notes the August Review.

Kissinger earlier praised Obama’s picks for economic recovery, and why not?

Obama picked Trilateral Commission wonder boy Timothy Geithner to be Secretary of the Treasury. The rest of the team are protégés of Robert Rubin, also a Trilateral and former Treasury Secretary under Clinton.

Obama’s top foreign policy advisor has been Zbigniew Brzezinski, the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller.

Finally, before Obama was elected, Kissinger went on the Charlie Rose Show and talked about the New World Order:

But never mind. It’s all a crazy conspiracy theory, never mind another indication that the one-worlders control the president, this time admitted by top NSC honcho James Jones, who just so happens to be a member if the Trilateral Commission.

Research related links (if you go to the "infowars" web link above, the list below are all active links.)

Kissinger Again Shills Obama and the New World Order
Obama picks president of Council on Foreign Relations to be Foreign Policy Advisor
Kissinger Sent to Russia to Cut New World Order Deal
Kissinger Calls For New International System Out Of World Crises
Globalists Henry Kissinger & Richard Haass Confronted on Terrorism and Global Depopulation Policies
Kissinger: Obama’s crisis could yield ‘opportunities’
Kissinger Calls for a New World Order
Review: The Obama Deception by Alex Jones
Kissinger: ‘Nations will decide on attacking Iran’
Obama: Trilateral Commission Endgame
Kissinger, top GOP senator like Clinton for Sec of State
Chorus call for New World Order

letzrockexpress · Mar 24, 2009

Chef,
You're cooking up a load of crap again. If you are going to cut and paste writings you find on these right wing fringe wack job websites, have some integrity and verify your sources.
infowars.com, which you posted a link to, describes the GIVE bill as the "National Enslavement Bill" It is peppered with flat out lies. You should read what you post before you post it. If you did read it and you posted it anyway, shame on you.

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

Part of the problem here is we don't know what the tribute to Kissinger was the day before the remarks, what promted the remarks, or what role Kissinger actually plays in the NSC.

The other problem is when Kissinger utters the phrase, "new world order" he does not utter it with the same "OMG New World Order!" one-world totalitarian government that the conspiracy theorist believe will happen. People don't like change. The world is changing, it has changed, and the days of the US saying "Jump!" and the rest of the world saying, "How high?" are long gone. Get over it. The world is in the process of becoming different.

When Kissinger talks about a new world order, he's talking of it in the classic sense, regardless of what the conspiracy theorists think. He's talking of a fundamental and dramatic change in political thought, and yes, in the balance of power. We've got a economic system on the planet that is global, and we've got a political system that consists of little pockets all over the globe. These are not in concert with each other and it must be reconciled in a fundamentally different way that it is being handled presently.

There are really only two solutions. One is to create an international political regulatory system that has the same reach as the economic system. The conspiracy wackos will read that and just go nuts. But the other solutions would be to shrink the economic systems back down to more manageable political size, likely creating a whole new method of trade, a new mercantilism, consisting of smaller regional units.

As to the first, it does not mean a one-world givernement. It merely means a closer political cooperation, to pool the goals, assets and resources. American's role would be decisive in such a global agreement, but only insofar as how well we can shed the holier than thou righteousness attitudes we have about the world and our place in it. The more aggressive we are, the more the rest of the world will recoil. The key will likely be America's relationship with China. If China were to become frustrated or bored with America, they could easily pull back in fine protectionist form, and form a self-sufficient exclusively Asian economic and political structure. That would nearly require the rest of the world to quickly form essentially either a completely separate political and economic system, or break it back down into the mercantilism and diplomatic models of the 1800's, which doesn't seem like it world work.

The only option that's gonna work long term for this planet is for the world to become a smaller place, with fewer political and economic disagreements. That doesn't mean a one-world government in a proper-name New World Order, but it does mean a new economic and political order for the world. There's a difference.

chefdennis · Mar 25, 2009

Hmmm, I guess the "Council on Foreign Relation" is a wack job right wing fringe group:

Remarks by National Security Adviser Jones at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy

Published February 8, 2009

Remarks by National Security Adviser Jones at 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy - Council on Foreign Relations

(the blue words above are really a "Web link", not just a bunch of Blue words and title.)

Speaker: James L. Jones

U.S. National Security Adviser Jones gave these remarks at the 45th Munich Conference on Security Policy at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof on February 8, 2009.

"Thank you for that wonderful tribute to Henry Kissinger yesterday. Congratulations. As the most recent National Security Advisor of the United States, I take my daily orders from Dr. Kissinger, filtered down through Generaal Brent Scowcroft and Sandy Berger, who is also here. We have a chain of command in the National Security Council that exists today.

I said in the 1st sentence to forget that the article came from alex jones as he can be over the top....but in this case he was simply reporting what the CFR has put out. Sure he added his opinions, just as you did yours. But the article is about kissingers involvement and managing the NSC and his open desire for a NWO and his connections to the TRC, CFR, and the Bilderberg group.....not alex's often far reaching descriptive conclusions....

Now, Turtle, Thanks for your insight. Me personally I think kissinger is a bit more leaning to a global currency and a "one world government", more or less with a UN type body running the show. I mean we already have a weak SC making decisons based on international law instead of just our Constitution as they should...so while it won't happen anytime soon, I certainly wouldn't dismiss the thought that one day we could be part of a one world governing body beyond the simply economic needs and applications.

PS: Well we might us be closer to a new World currency as the reserve after Turbo Tax Tim Geithner's statement today that he has no problem with the world going away from the dollar as the reserve currency......at which time the market took a dump of about a 250 point swing from up over 100 to down over 180...........good move Timmy........LOL, then we had a short term bond sale today at the FED and ......well how do they say it, "they threw a party and no one came......" they had a very low turn out and sales were worse then they figured....now i guess the foreign wealth funds figure, we don't even want our own dollar..........LOL.....

PSS: Now timmy is back tracking, covering his tracks and realizing he stepped in it!! LOL......

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

chefdennis said:
...so while it won't happen anytime soon, I certainly wouldn't dismiss the thought that one day we could be part of a one world governing body beyond the simply economic needs and applications.

Ever seen Star Trek? It's gonna happen.

chefdennis · Mar 25, 2009

LOL, you know, I am really goin to look like a flake here, but I can count the Star trek episodes and i have watched and i have never seen any of the movies...........

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

Oh, well, here's how it will go. On April 5th, 2063 Zefram Cochran will use a fusion reactor on board a spacecraft to heat plasma, and by sending this plasma through warp coils, he will create a "warp bubble" which will be used to move the spacecraft into subspace, and hence, exceed the speed of light.

This "Warp Signature" will be detected by a nearby Vulcan spaceship on a routine survey mission. Up to that point the Earth was of no interest, too primitive. The Vulcans, as well as every other highly advanced species in the universe, know that once a species reaches the level of technology to invent Warp Drive they are then ready to become part of the larger picture, to become citizens if the universe, members of the United Federation of Planets, and are ready for First Contact. Therefore, the Vulcan ship lands on Earth, makes First Contact, showing us that our petty little political differences here are meaningless and we set those aside.

War, disease, poverty are all eliminated within decades with the help of the Vulcans and the Federation. Countries will still exist, but people will no longer think of themselves as being from this country or that country as much as being from Earth. The Earth will have one voice that speaks to the Federation, and in fact, will become the leader and dominating force within the Federation (Star Trek was, after all, written by Americans with American attitudes). Statues will be erected in honor of Zefram Cochran. People will graduate from Zefram Cochran High School. All women will look hot in a Federation uniform. And we will fight The Borg.

You may scoff at this. But it's real.

layoutshooter · Mar 25, 2009

Capt. Kirk for President!!! layoutshooter

chefdennis · Mar 25, 2009

wow......where can an old guy get one of those Federation uniforms!?!??

pjjjjj · Mar 25, 2009

Turtle said:
Oh, well, here's how it will go. On April 5th, 2063 Zefram Cochran will use a fusion reactor on board a spacecraft to heat plasma, and by sending this plasma through warp coils, he will create a "warp bubble" which will be used to move the spacecraft into subspace, and hence, exceed the speed of light.

So much for the future of expediting huh?

letzrockexpress · Mar 25, 2009

Chef said:
"Hmmm, I guess the "Council on Foreign Relation" is a wack job right wing fringe group":

"The Devil mixes lies with the truth" Linda Blair

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

pjjjjj said:
So much for the future of expediting huh?

Warp Speed is the epitome of expediting. What will kill the "local" transportation industry (local being Terrestrial) will be Transporter Technology, where you can beam whatever you want to anyplace on the planet in mere seconds. Add to that the Replicators that are matter re-arrangers that will create whatever you need on the spot, be it a plasma inducer or a hot cup of Earl Gray.

letzrockexpress · Mar 25, 2009

What will become of the Sci-Fi geeks??

mjolnir131 · Mar 25, 2009

Can i get that Earl Grey with lavender flower? ... what I'm manly, it just tastes good.

greg334 · Mar 25, 2009

Star trek, a model of a perfect militaristic totalitarian government?

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

greg334 said:
Star trek, a model of a perfect militaristic totalitarian government?

No, you're thinking of Star Fleet, the dominant military component of the United Federation of Planets. Star Fleet is a very narrow segment of life in the universe, and a very small part of Star Trek. But even at that, their primary function is one of exploration and self defense. Most of the members of the Federation who are not amongst the military lives their lives as they see fit. Their goals tend to be not the accumulation of wealth (the Fegengi being the rare, notable exception), but rather to better themselves through knowledge and exploration of all kinds.

greg334 · Mar 25, 2009

Turtle my shelled friend, no I am thinking of Star Trek, the concept. I can explain further but you may not believe me about it.

Turtle · Mar 25, 2009

Star Trek, The Concept, was Wagon Train to the Stars.

On the show, and in the concept, yeah, there's a one-world government, and if looked at in today's context, that's not a good thing. But in the 23rd century all the separate countries of today have evolved into a single planet with far different goals, motivations and ideologies than of today, and all of the planets in the Federation are the equivalent of what we would call countries today.

So when you say it's "a model of a perfect militaristic totalitarian government", that's fundamentally incorrect, unless you want to view it strictly through todays political climate and with today's goals and ideologies. Gene Roddenberry's Utopian Star Trek was, at it's most basic level, all about life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.