Of what?
Duh, I think you're in the wrong thread.Of the fact that someone can call a news outlet a "Hate Network", with examples of how biased and unreliable their reporting is, then cite an article from that same news outlet to rebut a point the opposition didn't even suggest, lol.
Duh, I think you're in the wrong thread.
CNN is most definitely not trustworthy, but they don't engage in "agenda driven" reporting. They're biased, but that's not the same as agenda driven. Fox (and MSNBC) is admittedly and unabashedly agenda driven.Some still think CNN doesn't have an agenda. Laughable.
That's what you said about CNN, but now you use them to support your point?
Either they're trustworthy, or they're not, you can't claim one thing one day and the opposite the next.
Sorry can't agree with that Statement.CNN is most definitely not trustworthy, but they don't engage in "agenda driven" reporting. They're biased, but that's not the same as agenda driven. Fox (and MSNBC) is admittedly and unabashedly agenda driven.
Do you need a vowel?