Biden said to come on down ......so its king biden now.
Do you really belive the crap you post or do you just like to type.So it's going to hit something like 3 million illegals a year at this rate if the border isn't closed.
Biden isn't following the law right now. The law says if you are in this country without authorization, meaning if you crossed the border illegally, you are to be deported immediately. You aren't to get a hearing for an asylum claim, because asylum claims are to be made at a point of entry.
Nice deflection there Ron, what would you do if you were in charge of the border? The answer is not much different that what is going on now, you have to follow the law.
3 million is probably a little low. Fiscal year ends September 30th, and at the current rate, according to CBP and DHS, there will be about 1.7 million apprehensions of illegal aliens for the fiscal year. That's the same number as in fiscal year 2000. Also that year, DHS estimates there were an additional 2.1 million successful unlawful entries - those that evaded capture. If those numbers hold up for the next 2 months, and there's no reason to think they won't, we're looking at closer to 4 million illegally crossing the southern border.Do you really belive the crap you post or do you just like to type.
I was always under the impression that they were allowed to do it that way. The sad part is that way more walk up to the border, present their passport and say Im going to do some shopping in the US and just never leave. And all of the ones who fly here on a tourist visa and never leave.Biden isn't following the law right now. The law says if you are in this country without authorization, meaning if you crossed the border illegally, you are to be deported immediately. You aren't to get a hearing for an asylum claim, because asylum claims are to be made at a point of entry.
Do you feel bad that your a Democrat or do you just like to complain.Do you really belive the crap you post or do you just like to type.
They're always serious about anything if they can use it to their advantage. The instant they can no longer use it to further their goals, they drop out like it never existed.I thought Dems were supposed to be serious about this Pandemic.
I thought Dems were supposed to be serious about this Pandemic.
It depends who they are: age, health status, already had virus, etc.You would think the republicans would be more serious about the virus, now that a way higher percentage of democrats are vaccinated, the virus is free to take out mostly republicans.
Just like in the Matrix we can only show you the door, you have to walk through it.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
Oh ok, so chemical respirators are needed when dealing with chemicals but dealing with such a deadly virus.... All that's needed is a paper or cloth mask? Ok.....They get $40 a pop. It was $28 until March.
Not for vaccines they don't. For other drugs, you betcha, but not for vaccines. For one thing, like I did already, most doctors aren't even administering covid vaccines at all, not much kickback wiggle room in nothing. But even regular vaccines there are no kickbacks.
Pharmaceutical companies make little or no money on vaccines. The entire pharmaceutical industry revenue in the US is a mind numbing $482 billion per year. They make $10 billion a year on just one hepatitis drug alone. Plenty left over for kickbacks.
By comparison, the total revenue possible per year if all childhood vaccines were given to every child born in the US from their birth until 18 years of age would be only $8 billion, which is equal to only 1.7% of pharma sales. And that's across 18 years. So, even vaccinating every child with every vaccine to prevent multiple illnesses across the country would bring in less revenue than just a single drug is capable of bringing in to treat a single infection in some people. There's no money in vaccines.
There is more revenue for the covid vaccine, but that's also because the taxpayers bankrolled the R&D. But then there's the Anti-Kickback statute which explicitly prohibits those administering the covid vaccine from obtaining incentives for giving the shots. The Office of Inspector General for HHS, who enforces the statute, keeps a close eye on things.
They did carve out an exception for incentives, but not for the ones giving the vaccine, it is for the ones getting the vaccine (bribing people to get it).
No.
There's a big difference between "being able to" and "very likely to." Masks are routinely worn in hospitals in situations where a contagion is likely to be spread, like when someone comes in with a staph infection, or during a pandemic.
Kinda like Republicans should be in favor of abortion, seeing as how abortion takes out millions of future Democrat voters?
Are you nuts......nothing is going to stop a baby maker from her money.....there is a reason most of them drive a caddy and yet live in section 8.Most die hard conservatives I know are for abortion because they think it saves them tax money, fewer welfare babies according to them.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
You're an expert with the "So tell." Give me a quote where I said all that is needed to protect yourself from covid is a cloth or paper mask. You can't, because I never said it. I never implied it, never even hinted at it.Oh ok, so chemical respirators are needed when dealing with chemicals but dealing with such a deadly virus.... All that's needed is a paper or cloth mask? Ok.....
I see you did some research.So doctors are getting kickbacks because the medical facility is getting paid $40 per vaccination.... You really think some of that money is not going to pay doctors??
Years ago that might be true, but other than a few more food stamps, more babies does not get you much. Back in the 80s you would have a couple more hundred bucks a month on your welfare check, but those days are gone, No more than 36 ( I think) months of cash assistance allowed, after than you are out of luck.Are you nuts......nothing is going to stop a baby maker from her money.....there is a reason most of them drive a caddy and yet live in section 8.
I never said you said that. I'm just pointing out the fallacy in your argument. You're saying respirators are needed for one thing but for a supposed so deadly airborne virus....a peice of paper or clothe is sufficient.You're an expert with the "So tell." Give me a quote where I said all that is needed to protect yourself from covid is a cloth or paper mask. You can't, because I never said it. I never implied it, never even hinted at it.