Turtle... you mentioned Letterman said nothing about rape. When he mentioned A-Rod knocking up a 14 yr old, that IS rape... statutory, but rape, nonetheless.
Why would you come on here and insult my intelligence like that?
Letterman never, "mentioned A-Rod knocking up a 14 yr old."
Not even once. Didn't even come close to it.
He didn't mention the kid by name. He stated that he wasn't aware that the daughter that was with Sarah Palin at the game was the 14 year old. He has a long history of NOT lying, so I have no reason to disbelieve him now, all of a sudden.
You can choose to believe he's lying, although you cannot intelligently justify doing so, and that's fine, I suppose.
The funny thing is, the joke wasn't even about the kid. The kid wasn't the subject of the joke, Sarah Palin was. The daughter getting knocked up by A Rod was the punchline.
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin at the Yankee game, during the seventh inning, her daughter was knocked up by Alex Rodriguez."
If it had said,
"One awkward moment for Sarah Palin's 14 year old daughter, during the seventh inning A Rod knocked her up," that would have been a far different joke, that would have been a joke about the kid, and would have been the joke that people are getting all bent out of shape about right now.
But, let's say that he DID mention A Rod knocking up a 14 year old girl, the girl STILL wouldn't be the subject of the joke, A Rod would be. It was A Rod that did anything in the joke, not the daughter.
Like I said, on the surface the joke is fine, it's only when you read into it what's not there that it becomes a problem. And when you read things that aren't there into what
I say, and then try to use it to insult my intelligence, it's an even bigger problem. My original post on this issue stands on its own. You should go back and re-read it. Here, I'll make it easy for you. Just click:
Click here if you are cerebrally challenged!