OVM
I don’t believe in the flat earth theories a.k.a. what is defined as a global economy today, because there are things that are hidden within the theory that is detrimental to ones individuality. Individuality is the basis for all of our rights and actually the main key to capitalism – freedom of choice.
Isolationist, you can tag me with that but until you see it from a big business stand point and the pitfalls of what a global society has to offer, than it is far better to live in an isolated society than to live without true rights and freedoms.
I know that there is a big difference between the US and the rest of the world (I will sort of explain later). I am first a citizen of the US, and second a person who lives in the world.
I am not a citizen of the world.
My allegiance is with my country, not the rest of the world. I feel that my country, for better or worst is not dependent on what other countries think about the US but rather feel that they should be concern about what we think of them. We are the consumers and the monetary fund that fuels the world.
Is national pride, want for a better life and unfettered freedoms something that can be called isolationism?
Most likely it is by many peoples definition of what an isolationist is but the real basis for what people deem as important in life and for the country it don’t matter because to be an isolationist means that we as a country are not the worlds police, we do not fund programs or provide aid for other parts of the world and we do not participate in anything that is not in our national interest.
But the fact is we are losing jobs, revenue and other things that are important for a leader to have and we are not by any means an isolated country.
A lose of jobs has many causes but don’t forget that the driving force for companies moving is the tax system we have and labor cost which is triggered by the consumer.
I mean that look at some of the taxes that these companies pay when in a tax free international zone. Also we want cheap stuff, the basis for consumptionism in our country – the Wal-Mart syndrome (which by the way is two of our best exports – consumptionism and the Wal-Mart syndrome). If our country, the US that is, would experiment with a change (serious change) to the tax system, I would bet a number of jobs would actually stay here. Changing consumer’s habits would be a lot harder to do.
Another addition to this picture is that the big companies are not the prime employers of the country, small businesses are. By changing the tax system to promote making money instead of penalizing the achiever, things will flourish.
There are two major issues that are a concern with moving, outsourcing, globalization of the economy or what ever you call it;
The first thing that is lost is tax revenue, locally, state and nationally through the revenue that is generated by the jobs people have. Look at how many states (Michigan for one) and cities (Detroit for another) who have been struggling with a loss in tax revenue. In the case of Michigan, we have a huge labor pool but no incentive for businesses to move here because of the taxes we have in this state. What really suffers is the education system because of the debasing of tax revenues and right now we have a very very poor education system which is in need of some very serious changes.
The second thing is laws are not harmonized for equality. We see this with the Mexican trucking question, where do our rights start and theirs end on this issue. We as truck drivers question the need for a Mexican truck to drive anywhere when their licensing system, accountability system and safety system don’t come close to what we had in the 1950’s. If you look at this fight, whom the players are and what effect this will actually have on our society, you should see that it is not a good thing unless all things are equal.
The issue of sovereignty is a huge one. There is more to this than flag waving, there is something really negative about tearing down the barriers to gain access to any country for the betterment of any company and preventing people from having pride, a human nature, in the country that they belong to.
As for national pride, I can point to the EU and the internal fight going on between France and the rest of the EU over ‘fair’ trade and France’s idea that the EU laws don’t apply to their businesses because of “national prideâ€. Once the flat earth theory is applied as it is used in Europe with EU, countries lose their identity, their uniqueness and eventually their “national pride†all over the need to have a combined ‘all for one’ political eco-social system covering the entire continent without borders.
I do not agree with “Like it or not the implosion has started...you can deny it all you want. But it's going to happen. History will repeat itself. If you build walls and fences then obviously its you that are trapped within it? The rest of the world will go on without you.â€
One reason I disagree is that the world needs access to our economy, not the other way around. There is no implosion. The world is not going to pass us up and what we have been the place to sell and we will be for many years to come. If we allow unfettered access to our country without borders, we will end up having more issues with deflation and the strength of our dollar. There is a well established method to control this and we use it as a border, it is called import tariffs.
But with that said, on the world political stage we have to deal with little competition and a lot of jealousy, remember that;
• Our monetary system, our business environment and our political system is still and will remain number one simply because of our stability in comparison to the rest of the world.
• Our research, our progress with science and technology and our institutes of higher learning are still number one with their output of ideas, innovations and patents still higher than any other country.
• Our production rate, our ability to adjust to changes and our ‘can do’ attitude is still number one. For this alone, I have faced a lot of criticism from my former French colleagues who said we; work to hard, we don’t know how to have fun and our 40 hour work week standard is akin to slavery. My response was what has the French produced in the last 60 years outside of the NAZI party, Citroen 2CV and Dijon mustard?
You can call this all flag waving, but it is the truth and a cause for the hatred from other countries who struggle, like France and the EU with simple issues – they still haven’t figured out the idea behind immigration let alone how to be productive. The brits as great as they are, just figured out how to build things without hand fitting parts only 50 years ago when we have been doing that since 1798. I can give you hundreds of other examples but I will give you one, Boeing and AirBus.
I am trying to figure out what ‘history’ will be repeated?
I mean when in history have we had this type of economic system where walls and fences trap us in? I can’t see this after reviewing my sources and books.
You can argue that building a wall on the Mexican border will stop Hollywood access to cheap labor for their lawns and domestic help, which to some is a bad thing to have a wall but reality is that opening the border without a clear path to access, we open our society to more abuse and a lowering to our standard of living.
I love the comparison of the Berlin wall that has been made by the Mexican president the other day. No one seemed to tell him that there is a big political difference between the countries and trying to keep an oppressed population in a country in comparison to trying to stop an invasion.