C'mon.....Seriously?
- Thread starter witness23
- Start date
I don't think what he said was a racial comment, I think it was a narcissistic, egotistical comment, that "you can come along, but you'll have to sit in the back, because I, The Great and Powerful O, am gonna drive."
He's much more about Obama and all things Obama than he is anything else.
He's much more about Obama and all things Obama than he is anything else.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
This appears to be another obsession with you, maybe you should seek another hobby. As I asked you in the beginning.....
You ARE capable of comparative thinking, aren't you?
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
Truer words were never spoken concerning the big "O" but we can't forget that in order to bring about his "vision" for this country, he MUST divide.....and conquer.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
lmao......thank you, I needed a good laugh and that did it for me.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
ding, ding, ding, ding, ding......and we have a winner! Sarcasm Alert. But Turtle, saying that the President is narcissistic, egotistical doesn't get ratings and rile everyone up. You know why? Because to be the President of the United States you would have to be a bit narcissisitic and egostistical, that's not radical enough to portray this man, they must take it to the extreme.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
Now this brings something else to mind. His so-called theological training is that there are the oppressed and the oppressor, with the latter being the rich, white, fat cats...or any of the rest of us that disagree with him. With that in mind, IMHO, it would give him a lot of joy to make that statement about "riding in the back".
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
DING DONG, DING DONG, DING DONG.....no winner here. Many people with far more education than any of us here agree that Obama's narcissism and ego is OFF THE CHARTS and some believe, dangerous. He's so far out there that he's having difficulty governing, that's why he so enjoys staying in the campaign mode. CRI at it's finest.
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Well, I suggest you get your gold, your guns, your survival seed banks, tinfoil hats and run to your bunkers before everything goes to h*ll in a handbasket.
Oh but I forgot. The Republicans will win the Senate and the House and fix everything. Then they can say they saved America from the evil that is Barack Obama. Even though they won't change anything that has already been done, and America will still stand as a great nation as it always been, but they will trumpet and say it was them who saved America.
Don't you get it? There is no difference between the two.
Oh but I forgot. The Republicans will win the Senate and the House and fix everything. Then they can say they saved America from the evil that is Barack Obama. Even though they won't change anything that has already been done, and America will still stand as a great nation as it always been, but they will trumpet and say it was them who saved America.
Don't you get it? There is no difference between the two.
You have to be careful with that, though, because if you believe it was intentional, then you're, uhm, reading his mind.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
And this is EXACTLY why we conservatives do what we do. If we sit back and say and do nothing, whether you want to believe it or not, the above will no longer be true.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
You have to be careful with that, though, because if you believe it was intentional, then you're, uhm, reading his mind.
Or I could be judging from previous actions!
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Or I could be judging from previous actions!
Enlighten me on these previous actions, please.
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
Just a few.........
When you, while admitting that you don't know all the facts yet, accuse a white police officer of "acting stupidly" when handling a situation involving a black man......you divide the country.
When your DOJ refuses to prosecute black panther members for intimidating voters......you divide the country.
When you constantly berate the "fat cats"......you divide the country.
And more recently, when you tell a group of minority voters to go out and "PUNISH" their enemies.......you divide the country.
Now, if you want to say that these things are "gaffes", then you'll have to admit that he's stupid. The alternative is to admit that it's intentional.
What Diesel just posted was what I was referring to also.
Another example: Obama’s Race Card: GOP Counts on ‘Black Folks Staying Home’ | The Blaze
dieseldiva
Veteran Expediter
Another good article......
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times]Wednesday, October 27, 2010
[/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Verdana,][SIZE=-1]THE OTHER RUSH[/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino,][SIZE=+2]
Punishing whites and other
Obama-isms[/SIZE][/FONT]
[FONT=Palatino,][SIZE=+1]
Exclusive: Erik Rush sees institutional racism harming election's integrity[/SIZE][/FONT]
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][SIZE=-1]
Posted: October 28, 2010
1:00 am Eastern
[/SIZE][/FONT][FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]By Erik Rush
[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]President Obama is flinging the race card around so carelessly in the run-up to the midterm election on Nov. 2 that he's liable to put someone's eye out – possibly his own. In an interview aired on the Spanish-language channel Univision on Oct. 25, the president uttered the following words:If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, "We're going to punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us," if they don't see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it's going to be harder and that's why I think it's so important that people focus on voting on November 2.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]In encouraging the punishment of Latinos' "enemies," Obama clearly meant whites, whether directly or by association with ideological adversaries. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
There's a fallacy that's been circulating for years vis-à-vis the working definition of the word "racism." Unsurprisingly, it was advanced by progressives, and unfortunately a lot of Americans bought into it. This tenet of the far left's creed holds that no one of color can effectively be a racist because they have no means by which they can implement their racism. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
This, of course, exempts everyone but whites from being racist. How convenient. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
Erik Rush's new book is bold, daring and needed: "Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal - America's Racial Obsession" [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
For the record: Antipathy toward another ethnic group or perception of one's own as superior to others is racism. So is a belief in racial separatism. And so is pandering to people of a given ethnic group while demonizing another – as Obama was doing with Univision's Latino viewers. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
I absolutely will not stand here (I'm speaking figuratively, since I am currently seated) and allow the president, his minions, or any other craven, progressive race-baiter wax Clintonesque with the semantics of this matter. My book, "Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal – America's Racial Obsession," released earlier this year, addressed this issue quite scrupulously. People who manipulate others on the basis of race, politicize race or pit ethnic groups against one another are practicing racism. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
President Obama qualifies for the appellation on a few other bases as well. Since 2007, many commentators have addressed the fact that Barack Obama was raised with the belief that people of northern European descent have an almost genetic predisposition for the oppression of other ethnic groups. We know that he was educated as a Muslim in Indonesia, and we're well aware of the philosophical paradigm of that faith where Westerners are concerned. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
This makes for a subtle irony: Given Obama's non-American environment and inculcated worldview, he really had no more exposure to what is commonly known as the "black experience in America" than an Eskimo. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
Later, his distrust of whites (revealed, if nowhere else, in his books "Dreams From My Father" and "The Audacity of Hope") was reinforced via exposure to people like his communist mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, and the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
Two days ago, WNDs Bob Unruh exposed another abominable consequence of the Obama administration's racist proclivities. An organization backed by billionaire activist and former Nazi collaborator George Soros has mobilized to intimidate volunteer observers from precinct polling locations. In fact, U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas, was seen inside a polling location electioneering and threatening a poll-watcher in Harris County, Texas. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]Clearly, nothing is sacred, and Chicago-style politics are "the new black" (pun intended). These are clearly criminal actions, yet neither, Soros, Lee nor anyone else are currently in the custody of federal marshals. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
Why? [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
If you recall, the Obama-Holder Justice Department was taken to task earlier this year by the alternative press when a former DOJ attorney testified to a culture of racism and racist policies in the department. This was precipitated by the Civil Rights Division's refusal to prosecute members of the New Black Panther Party for intimidating white voters in November 2008. [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
The central message here is that institutional racism within the Obama administration has set the tone for Obama supporters and surrogates during this election cycle. As many are aware, representatives of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN, with whom President Obama is as thick as thieves) were convicted of voter fraud in several cases in recent years. If Obama and Holder wouldn't prosecute people of color for voter intimidation when they had them on videotape doing so, then why, oh why would anyone of color be reluctant to repeat the offense? [/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=palatino, times new roman, georgia, times][FONT=Palatino,]
Those who are mobilizing to sway the vote – from Obama crony Soros, to Rep. Jackson Lee, to the street-level thugs who will be stationed at the polls – clearly know they'll face no danger of prosecution from a Justice Department that apparently counts civil-rights violations as no more serious a transgression than jaywalking – as long as the victims are white.[/FONT][/FONT]
