CIT to take the HIT???

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Well it looks like CIT is not TOO big to fail!! Here are a few articles over the last few days...if they go BK, this will hit Main Street hard. They hold alot of mortages and credit lines for the majory porition of small franchise businesses and alot of mid size businesses also...if those businesses can't get to their line of credit, that means alot of unpaid employess at your fav subway, dunkin Dounut, applebees and such!! Not good!! No one wants to see small business that the hit, but i guess they don't have enough "union members all totaled together to get barry to play along again.......

Major Lender Faces Crunch

CIT Hires Bankruptcy Adviser as Payment Looms; Financier to 1 Million Businesses

JULY 11, 2009
By JEFFREY MCCRACKEN and SERENA NG

CIT Group Inc., a lender to almost a million mostly small and midsize businesses across the country, is preparing for a possible bankruptcy filing after so far failing to win a government guarantee to help it borrow, said people familiar with the matter.

To prepare for a possible filing, CIT has retained the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, which has a prominent bankruptcy practice, these people said.

The mere hiring of bankruptcy counsel doesn't mean a company will actually make a bankruptcy filing. CIT has been pressing its case "with increased urgency to the government," said a person familiar with the matter, and is hopeful because "the government has not said absolutely no to anything."

CIT has a $1 billion payment due in mid-August and it is unclear the company "will be able to handle that," said this person. The company will give more guidance when it discusses second quarter earnings in two weeks.

CIT declined to comment on whether it was preparing a filing or why it had retained Skadden Arps. But if CIT did file, the consequences could be considerable, because the 101-year-old company, as of March 31, had $68 billion of liabilities.

CIT is registered as a bank holding company and has a bank in Utah with roughly $3.5 billion in deposits. But to get most of its funds to lend, it has historically relied on bonds and the short-term debt market known as commercial paper. It has been largely unable to tap the credit markets since mid 2007 and is trying to raise more money through its bank.

The New York-based lender has been stuck for months in a bureaucratic tangle over government assistance. It received $2.3 billion from the federal Troubled Asset Relief Program in December, after winning approval to become a bank holding company. But CIT has so far been unable to access another federal program, one that helps banks and thrifts sell debt with government guarantees. Access to that program would enable CIT, which has a below-investment-grade, or "junk," credit rating, to sell bonds at a low interest rate.

CIT confirmed Friday that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which oversees the debt guarantee program, has yet to approve its application. CIT said that its application to the FDIC remains outstanding and the company "continues to be in active dialogue with the government."

A bankruptcy filing by CIT could affect thousands of small borrowers, from Dunkin' Donuts franchisees to restaurant owners and clothing retailers. "If CIT were to go away, it would take a financing option away from franchisees who want to buy stores or expand their networks," said Kate Lavelle, chief financial officer of Dunkin' Brands, the which owns Dunkin' Donuts and has had a 50-year relationship with CIT.

On Friday, many CIT bonds slumped on heavy trading, and its stock tumbled to its lowest since the lender went public in 2002, further hurting its chances of raising capital from the private sector without more government aid. CIT bonds that mature in February 2010 were trading at 83.5 cents on the dollar and yielding over 40%, indicating that debt investors think it is unlikely they will be repaid in full. CIT shares sank 33 cents, or 18%, to $1.53, after dipping as low as $1.13 during the day.

The company's most pressing issue, said those familiar with the situation, is that it has a debt payment coming due in August. In all, CIT has about $2.7 billion that comes due this year and $8 billion more due next year.

The FDIC has been considering CIT's application for a federal debt guarantee since January and hasn't reached a decision. The agency is concerned about CIT's deteriorating financial position and operating losses.

A few months ago, CIT hired former Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger Altman and his boutique investment bank Evercore Partners to try to get more TARP funds or find another financial solution with the government, said the people familiar with the matter.

One problem with getting more aid is that the government has made it clear it doesn't see the company as a systemic risk to the financial system. The people familiar with the matter said the government feels that other lenders, such as J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. or Deutsche Bank AG, can handle many of the same loans that CIT specializes in, such as loans to small retailers or rail-car leasing firms.

Meanwhile, competitors like GE Capital Corp. and GMAC LLC have been able to sell debt with the backing of the government's top credit rating.

According to confidential documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, CIT has in recent weeks tried to assess the consequences of a failure of the lender on Middle America. Among them: Companies would lose access to $4 billion in untapped credit lines and thousands of manufacturers could run into problems.

CIT competes with the likes of Wells Fargo, Bank of America, General Electric Capital Corp. and regional banks in the sectors in which it is active. But many CIT customers say that the lender is often willing to make loans to businesses and borrowers that most banks typically shun. CIT now ranks 20th among U.S. bank holding companies, with assets of over $75 billion.

Founded in 1908, CIT, which used to be known as Commercial Investment Trust, has had a somewhat tumultuous history, its fortunes rising and falling during past credit cycles. In the 1990s it expanded into areas such as manufactured housing and financing technology equipment, only to get burned when those bubbles burst.

In 2001, following the dot-com bust, the company was acquired by Tyco International Ltd. , but was spun off in mid-2002 when Tyco became ensnared in an accounting scandal.

In 2003, CIT appointed its current chairman and chief executive, Jeffrey Peek, a former Merrill Lynch executive. Under his leadership, it expanded consumer-finance activities such as student lending. It also increased its presence in subprime mortgage lending during the credit boom.

When the credit crunch hit, the company rushed to leave those two businesses, concentrating instead on lending to small businesses and midsize companies, leasing railcars and providing cash advances to manufacturers and companies in exchange for their receivables.

"They are our sole financing partner and we are heavily reliant on them," said Haresh Tharani, founder and president of the Tharanco Group, a company in the apparel business.

Tharanco has a loan from CIT and also gets cash advances from the lender for its receivables. "I worry about the company.... If CIT fails, it would be detrimental to the confidence of many businesses," Mr. Tharani said.

Major Lender Faces Crunch - WSJ.com


Fed to Blame for CIT's Liquidity Problems: Forbes

By: CNBC.com | 14 Jul 2009 | 09:21 AM ET
Fed to Blame for CIT's Liquidity Problems: Forbes - Companies * US * News * Story - CNBC.com

The Federal Reserve should have focused on getting the securitization market working again, as it promised last autumn, to avoid situations like that in which lender CIT Group is now, Steve Forbes, CEO of Forbes, told CNBC Tuesday.
CIT Group has 1 million clients which include big names from the franchisee of Dunkin' Donuts to retailer Dillard's. Analysts fear that its collapse could deal a devastating blow to the economy by cutting off financing even more.

"CIT would have never have been in this trouble if the Federal Reserve had gotten the securitization market working again," Forbes told "Squawk Box."

Banks have now been recapitalized and have three times more cash than they did last September when Lehman Brothers collapsed but "what we have here, in terms of the rest of the market, in terms of securitization… that thing isn't working yet," he added.

CIT got $2.3 billion in bailout cash last year and is in talks with regulators about receiving more government help.


CNBC.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


One option would be to include the lender, which turned into a bank holding company last year, in the Federal Deposit Insurance's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program – but analysts say the government would not like this solution.

Forbes also said he was against bailing out individual companies but insisted the Fed should have done a better job to ensure this does not happen.

"The Federal Reserve has got to make a distinction… buying long-term Treasurys is useless," he said. "In terms of getting the securitization market going, they should have done this 3-4 months ago, we wouldn't be in this mess now."

"They should have aggressively moved on mortgage-backed securities, which they promised to do in November and never did," Forbes added.


CIT says government will not give it another bailout
By DANIEL WAGNER Associated Press
July 15, 2009, 5:26PM
CIT says government will not give it another bailout | Business | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle

WASHINGTON — Struggling commercial lender CIT Group says the government will not give it another bailout.
The news increases the likelihood of a bankruptcy filing for CIT, a lender to small- and mid-sized businesses that faces a liquidity crunch. The announcement comes after days of round-the-clock negotiations about a possible rescue for the company.

CIT has warned that its failure could prolong the economic crisis by imperiling roughly one million businesses that depend on it for credit.

The New York-based company’s release says CIT is “evaluating alternatives.”

CIT received $2.3 billion from the $700 billion financial system bailout.

CIT says government will not give it another bailout | Business | Chron.com - Houston Chronicle[/QUOTE]

CIT Announces That Discussions with Government Agencies Have Ceased

JULY 15, 2009 6:03 PM ET

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--CIT Group Inc. (NYSE: CIT - News), a leading provider of financing to small businesses and middle market companies, today announced that it has been advised that there is no appreciable likelihood of additional government support being provided over the near term.


The Company’s Board of Directors and management, in consultation with its advisors, are evaluating alternatives.


CIT Announces That Discussions with Government Agencies Have Ceased - Yahoo! Finance


Government will not give lender CIT 2nd bailout
By DANIEL WAGNER
AP Business Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Obama administration drew a line in the
sand on financial bailouts Wednesday, denying emergency aid to CIT
Group Inc., a struggling commercial lender on the brink of
bankruptcy.

After days of round-the-clock talks with regulators about a
possible government bailout, CIT late Wednesday said those
negotiations had ceased. The company said its management and
directors were "evaluating alternatives."

When asked about CIT, a Treasury Department spokeswoman said in
an e-mailed statement that "even during periods of financial
stress, we believe that there is a very high threshold for
exceptional government assistance to individual companies."

With its assets deteriorating and dangerously little cash on
hand, the news left CIT with few options outside of bankruptcy. A
filing could come as early as Wednesday night, analysts said.

CIT is one of the nation's largest lenders to small and mid-size
businesses. The company has warned that its failure could imperil
about a million corporate borrowers, including retailers,
restaurants and airlines.

The New York-based company was negotiating with officials from
the Treasury, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
for much of the week. An agreement on aid appeared close at midday
Wednesday.

But trading of CIT's shares was halted Wednesday afternoon.
The company had deteriorated so far that officials feared even a
short-term loan from Treasury's financial bailout might not save
it, according industry and government officials who spoke on the
condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss
the matter.

"I think it makes a bankruptcy filing a near certainty," said
longtime banking analyst Bert Ely. "It's quite possible they could
file before trading on Thursday."

CIT already received $2.3 billion from the $700 billion
financial system bailout.

A spokesman for the Fed declined to comment. A spokesman for the
FDIC could not be reached for comment Wednesday evening.
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
Some of the other big banks will be like vulture and swoop in and steal their customers....heck they enough money now....

Jp just repaid 25 billion to the government and Goldman is floating in cash...this one can absorbed without interrupting peoples paychecks.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
This will not be good for Small and mid size businesses nor will it be good for barrys new healthcare plan, he needs small business to absorb the tax increase...watch the unemployment #'s go up in the next 2-3 months...i bet we will be close to a reported 12-14% but the U6 numbers will be closer to 25-28%...this isn't a recession or a depression...what you are seeing is the beginning of a collapse of our economic structure as we know it...

In this case, it might not be a bad thing to let CIT go, but help the small businesses.....


CIT Talks Fall Apart, Bankruptcy Filing Likely Friday

CIT Talks Fall Apart, Bankruptcy Filing Likely Friday - Companies * US * News * Story - CNBC.com

By: CNBC.com with Reuters | 15 Jul 2009 | 10:40 PM ET

CIT Group is likely to file for bankruptcy Friday, a source close to the company tells CNBC. The major lender to small-and mid-sized U.S. businesses had been surprised at the failure of bailout talks.

CIT is now pursuing a plan that is likely to include a chapter 11 filing on Friday.

"Discussions with government agencies have ceased," CIT said in a statement. "There is no appreciable likelihood of additional government support being provided over the near term."

The announcement followed last-ditch talks in which the Treasury Department had expressed concern about a worsening liquidity crunch at New York-based CIT, and indications that government aid would not put the lender on a path to recovery.

Treasury, in a later statement, said the government needed to keep the threshold high for exceptional aid to individual companies, adding that the United States had a powerful set of financing mechanisms to help restart overall credit markets.

Founded more than a century ago, CIT's problems mushroomed in recent years in the wake of Chief Executive Jeffrey Peek's decision to expand into potentially highly profitable but riskier areas such as subprime mortgages and student loans.

If it were to go bankrupt, it would join Lehman Brothers Holdings and Washington Mutual among large U.S. financial services companies to collapse since the credit crisis accelerated last September.

It would also show the possible limits of Washington's willingness to rescue companies, after multiple bailouts for much larger companies such as American International Group and Citigroup.

"At least in the eyes of the Fed and the eyes of the Treasury, we've turned the corner, such that the systemic kinds of risks facing the economy may be well past," said Mike Knebel, a portfolio manager at Ferguson Wellman Capital Management in Portland, Oregon, which recently sold CIT bonds.

Trading in CIT shares [CIT Loading... () ] was halted on Wednesday afternoon, with the shares last trading at $1.65, up 4 cents. Standard & Poor's 500 stock futures were down 0.4 percent after-hours.

TARP Money Not Enough

CIT sought help even after it became a bank holding company in December so it could draw $2.33 billion of taxpayer money from the government's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

Treasury had been considering an aid package that included a temporary loan to give CIT room to strengthen its balance sheet by raising additional capital through debt or equity, a person familiar with the matter had said.

Other options had been access to Fed's discount window, as well as asset transfers, the person said. The person requested anonymity because the talks were private.

CIT's travails were a vexing problem for the Obama administration, which had proposed that Congress give the government the authority to unwind large, troubled financial firms in an orderly fashion.

Because regulators do not have that power yet, they had to decide whether to bail out a company whose collapse, while significant, would by itself likely not pose a "systemic" risk to the financial system. *


Treasury has also been supportive of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp granting CIT access to its government debt guarantee program, the person familiar said.

Asset transfers to CIT's banking unit would have required approval from regulators such as the FDIC, which is already heavy pressure to handle dozens if not hundreds of expected bank failures in the next couple of years.

The FDIC had also been reluctant to allow CIT to join other financial companies in issuing government-guaranteed debt under an existing program, believing that such options are designed for healthy institutions.

"Not all firms have to be saved and the government has to draw the line at some point," said James Barth, an economist at the Milken Institute.

"I don't think it's going to be a catastrophe or become another Lehman Brothers, given the FDIC's apparent concern about the quality of the assets."

An FDIC spokesman declined to comment.

Congress, Industry Groups Concerned

While CIT has shed from some of its riskier businesses, it still faced too much debt, including some $10 billion coming due in the year ending March 31, 2010.

Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said earlier on Wednesday he hoped the government could come up with a structured aid package for CIT.

"If CIT doesn't get structured help, then it will have a very negative effect, I'm told, on small businesses around the country," he said in an interview with Reuters.

Indeed, industry groups such as the National Retail Federation had argued that CIT's tentacles extended too far throughout the country to allow failure.

Steve Bartlett, chief executive of the Financial Services Roundtable, said 10,000 small businesses could be choked off from needed funds if CIT were allowed to collapse.

"This one is crystal clear," Bartlett said in an interview.

* The "FIX" was in at this moment!!!
 
Last edited:

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
there are other banks that step in and take over these accounts...I say let this one go......everyone else has or is getting their house in order.....I don't see this as a demise of our economy or long unemployment lines...
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
The problem is that the businesses that haven't already made a run on their lines of credit won't beable to get to any funds to pay bills and pay employees in the short term.....and goldman does not venture into this type of business...the tend to be more of and investment store, not a lender......I do hope something can be worked out, but from what is being said, not much will happen quick enought to save the bulk of these small businesses.....the gov still has crap load of TRAP funds, while i don't like it a bit, id rather see the small businesses bailed out then the banksters....the gov needs to work directly with these businesses thru the SBA, which isn't always timely in how it works either....
 

OntarioVanMan

Retired Expediter
Owner/Operator
The problem is that the businesses that haven't already made a run on their lines of credit won't beable to get to any funds to pay bills and pay employees in the short term.....and goldman does not venture into this type of business...the tend to be more of and investment store, not a lender......I do hope something can be worked out, but from what is being said, not much will happen quick enought to save the bulk of these small businesses.....the gov still has crap load of TRAP funds, while i don't like it a bit, id rather see the small businesses bailed out then the banksters....the gov needs to work directly with these businesses thru the SBA, which isn't always timely in how it works either....

they have at least the 25 billion JP Morgan just paid back...:D
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
ovm wrote:

they have at least the 25 billion JP Morgan just paid back... :D

Thats right and as i said as much as i hate the gov bailouts, i can see bailing out the small business to a degree..and the gov should be giving that money directly to the businesses and not thruogh another bankster....
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
After reading this last article a few times, this part jumped out at me the last time:

CIT's travails were a vexing problem for the Obama administration, which had proposed that Congress give the government the authority to unwind large, troubled financial firms in an orderly fashion.

Because regulators do not have that power yet, they had to decide whether to bail out a company whose collapse, while significant, would by itself likely not pose a "systemic" risk to the financial system.

This is going to let barry and tim come back and say, "see i told you so"...if you would have let us have the POWER we want when we asked for it we could have saved this....."

While i am sure this wasn't planned, it is as Rahm said, "a crisis that is not to be wasted!!" And as they sat with CIT, they seen how this could work to their advantage and told CIT that they were the cow that was going to get gored, but it will be ok as it will benefit the collective, not just the few.....

But i got news for them, this will be a "systemic" risk wen these small businesses start to take a dump......
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
You are correct about short term un-employment and the long term numbers are likely to be much worse than they ever have been IF we get a National Un-Healthy system forced on us. The bulk of the cost will fall to the employer which will take money from the company that they COULD have used to hire people.

As ALL of our taxes jump up to pay for this we will have LESS usable income to purchase goods that will be costing a LOT more than they do so retail activity will decline. That will fuel a DROP in goods orders which will CUT production which will CAUSE layoffs. That will LOWER the amount that the government takes in from taxes so they will raise them and on and on it goes.

EVERYTHING that I bought in England, not on the US base stores, costed DOUBLE what it did in the States. Gas was OVER $4 a gallon in 1976 when I went over there, it is closer to $10 per gallon now. FREE HEALTH CARE? NO such thing.

Look for a base un-employment rate in this country that will stay somewhere between 5-8% during the non-recession times. We most likely will NEVER see 3-5% again.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
The more i read this my thoughts are barry and timmy have just been waiting for a company that if it were to fail would inflict some pain on the people...not alot of pain, but just enough for them to see what can happen if the elected minoons don't turn over the power that barry wants to him....

A Cit BK will be a sytemic risk to the economy... i think this is as Biden said, another thing they "misjudged"...like the total economic situation!!!!

This is socialistic facist control politics, plain and simple.....hurt the people and then push for control.....
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The CONTROL and FORCE that the left has ALWAYS used to get their way in the past will show up here soon. I just wonder how many will die so they can get their way? I fear it will be many. :(
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
This is going to be a mess, hopefully the smaller banks can pickup the load....

CIT failure would chill US restaurant operators

Thu Jul 16, 2009 5:45pm EDT
CIT failure would chill US restaurant operators | Markets | Bonds News | Reuters

* CIT bankruptcy would disrupt restaurant franchising

* Small banks may help fill the gap

By Lisa Baertlein

LOS ANGELES, July 16 (Reuters) - A potential bankruptcy of CIT Group Inc (CIT.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) would be another blow to restaurant operators and other franchisees by removing yet another funding source at a time when many large banks have frozen lending.

But longer term, analysts say the long-suffering restaurant sector should be able to hunt down alternatives.

"We think long term our people will find other places to go, short term there will be pain," said Matthew Shay, chief executive of the International Franchise Association, which has lobbied the Obama administration to rescue CIT -- one of the largest providers of loans to small businesses in the United States.

"If CIT were to go away, it would take a financing option away from our franchisees who want to buy stores or expand their networks," said Michelle King, spokeswoman for Dunkin' Brands Inc, which is owned by private equity firms Bain Capital Partners, the Carlyle Group [CYL.UL] and Thomas H. Lee Partners.

Franchisees, whose numbers are dominated by restaurant operators, make up a large percentage of the nation's small business operators.

CIT has provided funding for operators of restaurants ranging from Dunkin' Donuts to Yum Brands Inc's (YUM.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) Pizza Hut.

The lender warned late on Wednesday that government bailout talks had ended, a move that could set the stage for bankruptcy. [ID:nN16402649]

But CIT has effectively been out of the market this year, said Craig Moore, president of CiCi Enterprises, which owns and operates 650 CiCi Pizza restaurants in 30 states and does not borrow from CIT.

"We started seeing it at the end of last year. It really got tough as we rolled over to the beginning of the year," said Moore, who like other restaurant operators is reporting that small, community banks have begun to step into the gap.

But Shay doubts that local bankers can completely fill the gap: "One of our concerns is how much capacity do these community banks have?" he said.

Large restaurant operators have reported that the recession and ongoing credit crunch have made it harder to sell existing restaurants to franchisees.

The lack of loans, or unusually tough loan requirements, also made it tougher for people who have lost jobs to start their own businesses.

"We've never seen more inquiries for franchisees than right now. Everybody's trying to get control of their lives," Moore said. "The reality is the American dream is dead right now." (Reporting by Lisa Baertlein; Editing by Tim Dobbyn)
 

pelicn

Veteran Expediter
Does it not raise flags, that GE Capital, who's in bed with the Obama administration, got a bailout and CIT is being refused? CIT is GE's biggest competitor, and finances small businesses.
 

Dreammaker

Seasoned Expediter
Does it not raise flags, that GE Capital, who's in bed with the Obama administration, got a bailout and CIT is being refused? CIT is GE's biggest competitor, and finances small businesses.

Seems as if Goldman and GE are having their competitors taken out by government action/inaction. I guess you could say extreme lobbying and large political contributions do indeed have repercussions. Who would have thought that follow the money still is the best way to forecast congressional/governmental action? :eek:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Well it is the same as the leaman brothers and goldman saks. The people who are actually in control of our monetary system all come from Goldman and just the conflict of interest issues that have cropped up over stocks and profits are being suppressed so they can continue their power grab.

I thought this was all going to change? I didn't know that we would now have the haliburton style involvement with our government expanded? I thought Obama was going to end all of that.
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Welll they made a deal with the bondholders and are still alive..thats not a bad thing...if nothing else it will give CIT's clients time to find other forms of finance and lines of credit before what i think will happen later (but too far down the road) instead of now....

CIT clinches $3 billion rescue

Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:37pm EDT
CIT clinches $3 billion rescue: source | U.S. | Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - CIT Group Inc has clinched $3 billion of emergency financing from bondholders, keeping the struggling lender out of bankruptcy, a person close to the matter said.

The rescue from several big bondholders including Pacific Investment Management Co has been approved by CIT's board and could be announced on Monday, the source said.

A rescue could allow more time for the 101-year-old lender to small and mid-sized businesses to restructure its debt, and preserve the ability of thousands of businesses to obtain cash needed for day-to-day operations.

Yet several analysts and bankers said it might only delay a bankruptcy filing, in light of skittishness among CIT customers and the New York-based company's inability to readily tap capital markets.

"The deal is a negative for bondholders as it does not fix the underlying problem and layers in more secured debt," wrote CreditSights Inc analysts Adam Steer and David Hendler. "Without a viable funding model, we believe CIT may still be at risk of filing for bankruptcy."

CIT spokesman Curt Ritter declined to comment after initial reports of the rescue. He was not available on Monday.

In afternoon trading, CIT shares were up 58 cents, or 82.9 percent, at $1.28 on the New York Stock Exchange.

HIGH BORROWING COSTS

According to published reports, CIT would pay interest on the financing of 10 percentage points more than the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate. This equates to an annual rate of about 10.5 percent.

The bondholder group includes Pimco, a unit of German insurer Allianz SE, and other large investors, and is expected to provide financing with a 2-1/2-year term, two people familiar with the matter said.

This financing would be backed by unsecuritized CIT assets, which probably exceed $10 billion, one of the sources said. The sources requested anonymity because the talks are private.

A rescue would help CIT address a looming $1 billion bond payment due next month. Yet it would not necessarily restore longer-term confidence in the company, following a liquidity squeeze exacerbated by customers who drew down credit lines.

CIT had sought emergency federal funding before talks broke down last week. The Obama administration appeared to draw a line as to how readily it would bail out troubled companies, following several big corporate bailouts over the last year.

Retail industry groups had last week urged U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to act to ensure CIT's survival.

The bondholder rescue could, however, preserve the government's $2.33 billion investment in CIT from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. CIT became eligible for such financing when it became a bank holding company in December.

A rescue "comes as a great relief" for retailers preparing for the back-to-school and holiday shopping seasons, said Tracy Mullin, chief executive of the National Retail Federation.

"CIT could not be allowed to fail at a time when retailers are already struggling to survive," she said in a statement.

CEO SURPRISED

Problems at CIT mushroomed two years ago in the wake of Chief Executive Jeffrey Peek's decision earlier in the decade to expand into subprime mortgages and student loans.

Last week's government decision not to provide aid surprised Peek, leading him to seek help from private investors, one of the people familiar with the matter said.

A bankruptcy would make CIT, with $75.7 billion of reported assets, the largest U.S. financial company to go bankrupt since Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc last September.

CIT has about $40 billion of long-term debt, CreditSights said. It has lost close to $3.3 billion since the end of 2007.

On Monday, it cost $4.3 million upfront plus $500,000 annually to insure $10 million of CIT debt against default for five years, down from $4.45 million upfront on Friday, according to Phoenix Partners Group.

CIT debt maturing in three to five years yielded in the mid-20s to mid-30s, according to bond pricing service Trace.

The company has been scheduled to report second-quarter results on July 23. It was unclear how the bailout talks might affect the timing of that report.

(Reporting by Jennifer Ablan, Paritosh Bansal, Michael Erman, John Parry, Ransdell Pierson and Jonathan Stempel; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick and John Wallace)
 

chefdennis

Veteran Expediter
Well it looks like i was right in the above post, even with the money and deal they made with the bondholders, CIT says id my STILL have to file BK ...this is long so you can read it all at the link provided:

CIT SAYS `EXISTING LIQUIDITY' NOT ENOUGH FOR AUG. DEBT PAYMENT
By Pierre Paulden, Caroline Salas and Ari Levy
CIT Expects Loss of $1.5 Billion, May Seek Bankruptcy (Update2) - Bloomberg.com

July 21 (Bloomberg) -- CIT Group Inc.’s $3 billion
financing pledge from bondholders may fail to shield the

commercial lender from about $10 billion of debt maturing
through next year, mounting loan defaults and a shrinking market
share.

“The company has indicated they have significant upcoming
maturities,” said Renee Dailey, a partner in the financial

restructuring group at law firm Bracewell & Giuliani LLP in
Hartford, Connecticut. “It’s unlikely that $3 billion will
solve their problems.”

CIT announced an agreement with bondholders to provide the
emergency financing late yesterday, keeping the 101-year-old

commercial finance company out of bankruptcy. The first $2
billion of the 2 1/2-year loan is available immediately, with
the rest expected in the next 10 days, New York-based CIT said.
The company said the deal is the first step in a bigger
restructuring and it’s also asking debt holders to agree to
reduce their claims. Bankruptcy is possible unless the tender

offer succeeds, the company said in a regulatory filing today.
The company, led by Chief Executive Officer Jeffrey Peek,

was brought to the brink of collapse by more than $3 billion of

losses in the past eight quarters on soured home mortgages,
student loans and commercial defaults. CIT had a loss of more

than $1.5 billion in the second quarter, the company said in
today’s filing.
 
Top